Healthcare professionals' perspectives on delivering end-of-life care within acute hospital trusts: a qualitative study.

Colette Reid, Jane Gibbins, Sophia Bloor, Melanie Burcombe, Rachel McCoubrie, Karen Forbes
Author Information
  1. Colette Reid: Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, UK.
  2. Jane Gibbins: Cornwall Hospice Care, St Julia's Hospice, Hayle, Cornwall, UK.
  3. Sophia Bloor: Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, UK.
  4. Melanie Burcombe: Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, UK.
  5. Rachel McCoubrie: Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, UK.
  6. Karen Forbes: Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, UK.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The quality of end-of-life (EOL) care in acute hospitals is variable and interventions to improve this care, such as EOL care pathways, are not always used. The underlying reasons for this variability are not fully understood. We explored healthcare professionals' views on delivering EOL care within an acute hospital trust in the South West of England.
METHODS: We employed qualitative methods (focus groups, in-depth interviews and questerviews) within a study investigating the impact of a simple EOL tool on the care of dying patients. We invited a range of staff of all grades with experience in caring for dying patients from medicine, surgery and care of the elderly teams to participate.
RESULTS: Six focus groups, seven interviews and five questerviews were conducted. Two main themes emerged: (a) delays (difficulties and avoidance) in diagnosing dying and (b) the EOL tool supporting staff in caring for the dying. Staff acknowledged that the diagnosis of dying was often made late; this was partly due to prognostic uncertainty but compounded by a culture that did not acknowledge death as a possible outcome until death was imminent. Both the medical and nursing staff found the EOL tool useful as a means of communicating ceilings of care, ensuring appropriate prescribing for EOL symptoms, and giving nurses permission to approach the bedside of a dying patient.
CONCLUSIONS: The culture of avoiding death and dying in acute hospitals remains a significant barrier to providing EOL care, even when EOL tools are available and accepted by staff.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Attitude of Health Personnel
Attitude to Death
Critical Pathways
England
Female
Focus Groups
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Personnel, Hospital
Qualitative Research
Surveys and Questionnaires
Terminal Care

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0careEOLdyingacutestaffdeathend-of-lifewithinhospitaltoolhospitalshealthcareprofessionals'deliveringqualitativefocusgroupsinterviewsquesterviewsstudypatientscaringcultureOBJECTIVE:qualityvariableinterventionsimprovepathwaysalwaysusedunderlyingreasonsvariabilityfullyunderstoodexploredviewstrustSouthWestEnglandMETHODS:employedmethodsin-depthinvestigatingimpactsimpleinvitedrangegradesexperiencemedicinesurgeryelderlyteamsparticipateRESULTS:SixsevenfiveconductedTwomainthemesemerged:delaysdifficultiesavoidancediagnosingbsupportingStaffacknowledgeddiagnosisoftenmadelatepartlydueprognosticuncertaintycompoundedacknowledgepossibleoutcomeimminentmedicalnursingfoundusefulmeanscommunicatingceilingsensuringappropriateprescribingsymptomsgivingnursespermissionapproachbedsidepatientCONCLUSIONS:avoidingremainssignificantbarrierprovidingeventoolsavailableacceptedHealthcareperspectivestrusts:Terminalprofessional

Similar Articles

Cited By