Reoperation after oesophageal cancer surgery in relation to long-term survival: a population-based cohort study.

Maartje van der Schaaf, Maryam Derogar, Asif Johar, Martin Rutegård, James Gossage, Robert Mason, Pernilla Lagergren, Jesper Lagergren
Author Information
  1. Maartje van der Schaaf: Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The influence of reoperation on long-term prognosis is unknown. In this large population-based cohort study, it was aimed to investigate the influence of a reoperation within 30 days of oesophageal cancer resection on survival even after excluding the initial postoperative period.
DESIGN: This was a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: All hospitals performing oesophageal cancer resections during the study period (1987-2010) in Sweden.
PARTICIPANTS: patients operated for oesophageal cancer with curative intent in 1987-2010.
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Adjusted HRs of all cause, early and late mortality up to 5 years after reoperation following oesophageal cancer resection.
RESULTS: Among 1822 included patients, the 200 (11%) who were reoperated had a 27% increased HR of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.53) and 28% increased HR of disease-specific mortality (adjusted HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.59), compared to those not reoperated. Reoperation for anastomotic insufficiency in particular was followed by an increased mortality (adjusted HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.76).
CONCLUSIONS: This large and population-based nationwide cohort study shows that reoperation within 30 days after primary oesophageal resection was associated with increased mortality, even after excluding the initial 3 months after surgery. This finding stresses the need to consider any actions that might prevent complications and reoperation after oesophageal cancer resection.

Keywords

References

  1. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;19(1):99-103 [PMID: 21769467]
  2. Acta Oncol. 2009;48(1):27-33 [PMID: 18767000]
  3. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Mar;94(3):757-65 [PMID: 10086663]
  4. Surg Today. 1998;28(6):576-9 [PMID: 9681604]
  5. Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):798-807 [PMID: 19809297]
  6. Lancet Oncol. 2003 Aug;4(8):481-8 [PMID: 12901962]
  7. Gut. 2014 Sep;63(9):1393-400 [PMID: 24270368]
  8. Ann Surg. 2012 Aug;256(2):235-44 [PMID: 22791100]
  9. J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Jan;198(1):42-50 [PMID: 14698310]
  10. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009;24(11):659-67 [PMID: 19504049]
  11. ANZ J Surg. 2010 Sep;80(9):634-41 [PMID: 20840408]
  12. J Surg Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;101(3):270-8 [PMID: 20082349]
  13. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Apr;13(4):557-64 [PMID: 16485146]
  14. Br J Surg. 2005 Sep;92(9):1150-4 [PMID: 16035134]
  15. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Nov;203(5):661-9 [PMID: 17084327]
  16. Br J Cancer. 1999 Mar;79(9-10):1392-8 [PMID: 10188881]
  17. N Engl J Med. 2003 Nov 27;349(22):2117-27 [PMID: 14645640]
  18. PLoS One. 2013 May 31;8(5):e64261 [PMID: 23741309]
  19. Ann Surg. 2008 Jan;247(1):71-6 [PMID: 18156925]
  20. Lancet Oncol. 2005 Nov;6(11):864-70 [PMID: 16257794]
  21. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):255-9 [PMID: 15273549]
  22. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 May;287(5):1009-16 [PMID: 23229580]
  23. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Dec;96(6):1919-26 [PMID: 24075499]
  24. Acta Oncol. 2012 Jan;51(1):65-8 [PMID: 22150167]
  25. Ann Surg. 2006 Apr;243(4):479-85 [PMID: 16552198]
  26. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Mar;8(3):226-34 [PMID: 17329193]
  27. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb 10;31(5):551-7 [PMID: 23295792]
  28. Dis Esophagus. 2012 Sep-Oct;25(7):645-51 [PMID: 22243561]
  29. N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 11;346(15):1128-37 [PMID: 11948273]

MeSH Term

Aged
Esophageal Neoplasms
Esophagectomy
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
Prognosis
Proportional Hazards Models
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Sweden

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.01oesophagealcancerreoperationstudymortalityHRpopulation-basedcohortresectionincreasedadjusted95%CIinfluencelong-termlargewithin30daysevenexcludinginitialperiodnationwide1987-2010reoperatedReoperationsurgeryOBJECTIVES:prognosisunknownaimedinvestigatesurvivalpostoperativeDESIGN:retrospectiveSETTING:hospitalsperformingresectionsSwedenPARTICIPANTS:PatientsoperatedcurativeintentPRIMARYANDSECONDARYOUTCOMES:AdjustedHRscauseearlylate5yearsfollowingRESULTS:Among1822includedpatients20011%27%all-cause27055328%disease-specific280459comparedanastomoticinsufficiencyparticularfollowed8219276CONCLUSIONS:showsprimaryassociated3monthsfindingstressesneedconsideractionsmightpreventcomplicationsrelationsurvival:Surgery

Similar Articles

Cited By (9)