Surgical strategy, methods of reconstruction, surgical margins and postoperative complications in oncoplastic breast surgery.

Michael Rose, Jonas Manjer, Anita Ringberg, Henry Svensson
Author Information
  1. Michael Rose: Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery, Sydvestjysk Sygehus, Esbjerg, Denmark ; Department of Plastic Surgery, Aleris-Hamlet Hospitaler, Copenhagen, Denmark ; Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden ; Kirurgisk Klinik, Plastikirurgisk Sektion, Sydvestjysk Sygehus, Finsensgade 35, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark.
  2. Jonas Manjer: Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden ; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
  3. Anita Ringberg: Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden ; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
  4. Henry Svensson: Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden ; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oncoplastic breast surgery is an evolving discipline in the surgical treatment of breast cancer aimed to improve the outcome.
METHODS: Oncoplastic breast surgery was performed between January 2008 and December 2010 on 72 women with 74 breast cancers selected from a population of 1,018 primary breast cancer patients. Careful preoperative planning revealed the possibility of partial breast reconstruction with volume reduction, volume displacement or volume replacement depending on breast size as well as tumour size and location. Data were registered consecutively.
RESULTS: The surgical plan was successful in all but one case, where a mastectomy had to be performed during the primary surgery. In 53 cases, a contralateral mammoplasty was performed during the operation to achieve symmetry. During the follow-up period until November 2011, only one patient needed corrective surgery. Final histopathological examination indicated that seven cases required extended resection and three cases required a mastectomy. Five patients experienced delayed wound healing, although complications requiring further surgery occurred for the reconstructed breast in four cases, the contralateral breast in three cases and the axilla after exaeresis in two cases because of haematoma. Such complications led to slight delay in adjuvant therapy for four patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that it is feasible to implement oncoplastic breast surgery into daily clinical practice as a supplement to conventional breast cancer surgery. As such, oncoplastic breast surgery may provide a markedly better outcome than breast-conserving surgery in terms of shape and symmetry without compromising the surgical margins. Level of Evidence: Level IV, prognostic/risk study.

Keywords

References

  1. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 Jul;12(7):539-45 [PMID: 15889210]
  2. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2012 Dec;46(6):404-9 [PMID: 23157501]
  3. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2009 May;21(4):285-93 [PMID: 19249195]
  4. Breast. 2009 Apr;18(2):126-9 [PMID: 19318251]
  5. Breast. 2006 Dec;15 Suppl 2:S27-30 [PMID: 17382858]
  6. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;38(3):196-202 [PMID: 22206704]
  7. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Aug;63(8):1233-43 [PMID: 19559661]
  8. Breast. 2007 Aug;16(4):411-9 [PMID: 17374485]
  9. Am J Surg. 2010 Aug;200(2):224-8 [PMID: 20573334]
  10. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005 Oct;31(8):817-23 [PMID: 16043322]
  11. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Oct;16(10):2717-30 [PMID: 19609829]
  12. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2006 May-Jun;30(3):363-8 [PMID: 16733783]
  13. Br J Surg. 2012 Oct;99(10):1389-95 [PMID: 22961518]
  14. Indian J Surg. 2012 Jun;74(3):255-63 [PMID: 23730053]
  15. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999 Dec;25(6):571-3 [PMID: 10556001]
  16. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Sep;124(3):969-972 [PMID: 19730320]
  17. Breast. 2007 Aug;16(4):387-95 [PMID: 17376687]
  18. World J Surg. 2008 Dec;32(12):2570-7 [PMID: 18581169]
  19. Breast. 2011 Oct;20 Suppl 3:S92-5 [PMID: 22015301]
  20. Br J Plast Surg. 2005 Oct;58(7):902-7 [PMID: 16043153]
  21. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Feb;117(2):366-73 [PMID: 16462314]
  22. Acta Oncol. 2009;48(1):152-4 [PMID: 19031165]
  23. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Apr;63(4):623-32 [PMID: 19303832]
  24. Lancet Oncol. 2005 Mar;6(3):145-57 [PMID: 15737831]
  25. Br J Plast Surg. 2002 Jul;55(5):390-5 [PMID: 12372367]
  26. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jul;124(1):9-17 [PMID: 19568039]
  27. Br J Plast Surg. 2005 Oct;58(7):889-901 [PMID: 16043150]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0breastsurgerycasessurgicalcancerreconstructioncomplicationsOncoplasticperformedpatientsvolumeoncoplasticmarginsoutcomeprimarysizeonemastectomycontralateralsymmetryrequiredthreefourstudyLevelSurgicalBACKGROUND:evolvingdisciplinetreatmentaimedimproveMETHODS:January2008December201072women74cancersselectedpopulation1018CarefulpreoperativeplanningrevealedpossibilitypartialreductiondisplacementreplacementdependingwelltumourlocationDataregisteredconsecutivelyRESULTS:plansuccessfulcase53mammoplastyoperationachievefollow-upperiodNovember2011patientneededcorrectiveFinalhistopathologicalexaminationindicatedsevenextendedresectionFiveexperienceddelayedwoundhealingalthoughrequiringoccurredreconstructedaxillaexaeresistwohaematomaledslightdelayadjuvanttherapyCONCLUSIONS:demonstratesfeasibleimplementdailyclinicalpracticesupplementconventionalmayprovidemarkedlybetterbreast-conservingtermsshapewithoutcompromisingEvidence:IVprognostic/riskstrategymethodspostoperativeBreastMethodsPartialPostoperative

Similar Articles

Cited By