Anesthetic Challenges in Robotic-assisted Urologic Surgery.

Richard L Hsu, Alan D Kaye, Richard D Urman
Author Information
  1. Richard L Hsu: Department of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston MA.
  2. Alan D Kaye: Department of Anesthesia, Louisiana State University, New Orleans, LA.
  3. Richard D Urman: Department of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston MA.

Abstract

Robotic-assisted surgery has evolved over the past two decades with constantly improving technology, assisting surgeons in multiple subspecialty disciplines. The surgical requirements of lithotomy and steep Trendelenburg positions, along with the creation of a pneumoperitoneum and limited access to the patient, all present anesthetic management challenges in urologic surgery. patient positioning requirements can cause significant physiologic effects and may result in many complications. Good communication among team members and knowledge of the nuances of robotic surgery have the potential to improve patient outcomes, increase efficiency, and reduce surgical and anesthetic complications.

Keywords

References

  1. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Jan;104(1):16-22 [PMID: 19933173]
  2. Anesthesiology. 2002 Jul;97(1):75-81 [PMID: 12131106]
  3. J Robot Surg. 2008 Jul;2(2):59 [PMID: 27637501]
  4. Orthopedics. 2010 Nov 02;33(11):852 [PMID: 21053878]
  5. AANA J. 2011 Apr;79(2):115-21 [PMID: 21560974]
  6. Ann Surg. 2004 Jan;239(1):14-21 [PMID: 14685095]
  7. Eur Urol. 2013 Feb;63(2):266-80 [PMID: 22940173]
  8. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Aug;114(2 Suppl):S24-31 [PMID: 19573702]
  9. AANA J. 2009 Oct;77(5):365-71 [PMID: 19911646]
  10. Eur Urol. 2011 Oct;60(4):767-75 [PMID: 21620562]
  11. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Jul 30;14:61 [PMID: 25100922]
  12. Anesth Analg. 1998 Dec;87(6):1393-7 [PMID: 9842835]
  13. Curr Opin Urol. 2010 Jan;20(1):75-9 [PMID: 19887946]
  14. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012 May;78(5):596-604 [PMID: 22415437]
  15. Eur Urol. 2013 May;63(5):941-6 [PMID: 23219087]
  16. Lancet. 1953 Mar 14;1(6759):522-4 [PMID: 13036056]
  17. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):664-72; quiz 673 [PMID: 17848335]
  18. Anesth Analg. 2011 Nov;113(5):1069-75 [PMID: 21233502]
  19. J Urol. 2004 Apr;171(4):1720-5 [PMID: 15017273]
  20. Eur Heart J. 2005 Feb;26(4):384-416 [PMID: 15681577]
  21. Int J Clin Pract. 2009 Feb;63(2):185-8 [PMID: 19196355]
  22. Anaesthesia. 2006 May;61(5):439-43 [PMID: 16674617]
  23. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Nov;107(5):782-9 [PMID: 21948951]
  24. Urol Clin North Am. 2004 Nov;31(4):769-72 [PMID: 15474604]
  25. Anesth Analg. 1993 May;76(5):1067-71 [PMID: 8484509]
  26. BJU Int. 2008 Jul;102(1):86-92 [PMID: 18336600]
  27. Lancet. 1952 Oct 18;2(6738):759-60 [PMID: 12991571]
  28. J Endourol. 1994 Apr;8(2):99-103 [PMID: 8061681]
  29. Anesth Analg. 2002 May;94(5):1345-50 [PMID: 11973218]
  30. Eur Urol. 2006 Apr;49(4):612-24 [PMID: 16442210]
  31. J Robot Surg. 2007;1(2):119-23 [PMID: 25484947]
  32. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006 May-Jun;13(3):245-8 [PMID: 16698535]
  33. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Jun;19(5):967-82 [PMID: 18637599]
  34. J Clin Anesth. 2002 May;14(3):228-33 [PMID: 12031759]
  35. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010 Dec;23(6):697-703 [PMID: 20847690]
  36. BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3):518-23 [PMID: 22928639]
  37. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;51(1):18-25 [PMID: 22482963]
  38. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118 [PMID: 23074405]
  39. J Robot Surg. 2012 Sep;6(3):269-71 [PMID: 27638287]
  40. Anesth Analg. 2009 Aug;109(2):473-8 [PMID: 19608821]
  41. Urology. 2010 Nov;76(5):1122-4 [PMID: 20570321]
  42. Anesth Analg. 1999 Sep;89(3):800 [PMID: 10475329]
  43. J Int Med Res. 2011;39(3):1084-9 [PMID: 21819742]
  44. Eur Surg Res. 1993;25(4):203-12 [PMID: 8330637]
  45. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Jul-Aug;17(4):504-7 [PMID: 20471916]
  46. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Apr;104(4):433-9 [PMID: 20167583]
  47. Eur Urol. 2008 Jul;54(1):54-62 [PMID: 18403100]
  48. BJU Int. 2006 Sep;98(3):508-13 [PMID: 16925745]
  49. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 May-Jun;17(3):295-300 [PMID: 20303833]
  50. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012 Jul;40(4):614-21 [PMID: 22813488]
  51. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1995 Oct;39(7):949-55 [PMID: 8848897]
  52. J Clin Anesth. 2011 Feb;23(1):75-8 [PMID: 21296253]
  53. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010 Nov;59(5):329-34 [PMID: 21179295]
  54. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Feb;103(2):374-82 [PMID: 14754710]
  55. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 May;27(5):478-80 [PMID: 19918180]
  56. Medicina (Kaunas). 2009;45(10):772-7 [PMID: 19996663]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0surgerycomplicationsRobotic-assistedsurgicalrequirementspatientanestheticPatientpositioningUrologicevolvedpasttwodecadesconstantlyimprovingtechnologyassistingsurgeonsmultiplesubspecialtydisciplineslithotomysteepTrendelenburgpositionsalongcreationpneumoperitoneumlimitedaccesspresentmanagementchallengesurologiccancausesignificantphysiologiceffectsmayresultmanyGoodcommunicationamongteammembersknowledgenuancesroboticpotentialimproveoutcomesincreaseefficiencyreduceAnestheticChallengesSurgeryAnesthesiaPeripheralnerveinjuryPneumoperitoneumRobotic

Similar Articles

Cited By (24)