Experience of using information systems in public health practice: findings from a qualitative study.

Joshua R Vest, L Michele Issel, Sean Lee
Author Information
  1. Joshua R Vest: Center for Healthcare Informatics & Policy, Division of Quality and Medical Informatics, Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College.
  2. L Michele Issel: Community Health Sciences Division, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago.
  3. Sean Lee: Community Health Sciences Division, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Data collection and management by local health departments (LHDs) is a complex endeavor, complicated by system level and organizational factors. The purpose of this study was to describe the processes and use of information systems (IS) utilized for data collection, management, and sharing by LHD employees.
METHODS: We interviewed a purposive sample of 12 staff working in the key public health practice areas of communicable disease control, immunizations, and vital records from three LHDs in different states. Our interview questions addressed job descriptions, daily activities, and the use and perceptions of both data and IS in support of their work. A content analytic approach was used to derive themes and categories common across programmatic areas.
RESULTS: Local public health involves the use of mix of state-supplied and locally implemented IS supported by paper records. Additionally, each LHD in this study used at least one shadow system to maintain a duplicate set of information. Experiences with IS functionality and the extent to which it supported work varied by programmatic area, but inefficiencies, challenges in generating reports, limited data accessibility, and workarounds were commonly reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Current approaches to data management and sharing do not always support efficient public health practice or allow data to be used for organizational and community decision making. Many of the challenges to effective and efficient public health work were not solely technological. These findings suggest the need for interorganizational collaboration, increasing organizational capacity, workflow redesign, and end user training.

Keywords

References

  1. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Jul-Aug;25(4):1017-28 [PMID: 16835182]
  2. Am J Public Health. 2012 Mar;102(3):e1-7 [PMID: 22390523]
  3. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 Jul-Aug;19(4):357-65 [PMID: 23719391]
  4. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007 Nov-Dec;13(6):559-66 [PMID: 17984708]
  5. BMC Public Health. 2010 Jul 29;10:447 [PMID: 20670448]
  6. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007 Mar-Apr;13(2):169-72 [PMID: 17299321]
  7. Online J Public Health Inform. 2012;4(2): [PMID: 23569634]
  8. J Food Prot. 2011 Mar;74(3):432-7 [PMID: 21375880]
  9. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:175-201 [PMID: 19296775]
  10. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005 Jul 29;54(29):722-4 [PMID: 16049421]
  11. Am J Prev Med. 2003 Nov;25(4):347-57 [PMID: 14580639]
  12. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):565-8 [PMID: 21964370]
  13. JAMA. 2012 Dec 26;308(24):2569-70 [PMID: 23281545]
  14. Vaccine. 2011 Feb 24;29(10):1997-2003 [PMID: 20863900]
  15. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2009 Sep-Oct;15(5):E6-12 [PMID: 19704303]
  16. Health Serv Res. 2009 Oct;44(5 Pt 2):1818-41 [PMID: 19686248]
  17. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2012 Mar-Apr;18(2):160-8 [PMID: 22286285]
  18. Public Health Rep. 2010 Jan-Feb;125(1):141-5 [PMID: 20402207]
  19. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2006 May-Jun;12(3):232-41 [PMID: 16614558]
  20. MMWR Suppl. 2011 Oct 7;60(4):15-21 [PMID: 21976162]
  21. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):542-9 [PMID: 17600093]
  22. JAMA. 1999 Jul 14;282(2):164-70 [PMID: 10411198]
  23. BMC Public Health. 2008 May 14;8:160 [PMID: 18479517]
  24. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010 Jan-Feb;16(1):E1-8 [PMID: 20009632]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthpublicdatainformationISmanagementorganizationalstudyusesystemsworkusedcollectionLHDssystemsharingLHDpracticeareasvitalrecordssupportprogrammaticsupportedchallengesefficientfindingsOBJECTIVE:DatalocaldepartmentscomplexendeavorcomplicatedlevelfactorspurposedescribeprocessesutilizedemployeesMETHODS:interviewedpurposivesample12staffworkingkeycommunicablediseasecontrolimmunizationsthreedifferentstatesinterviewquestionsaddressedjobdescriptionsdailyactivitiesperceptionscontentanalyticapproachderivethemescategoriescommonacrossRESULTS:Localinvolvesmixstate-suppliedlocallyimplementedpaperAdditionallyleastoneshadowmaintainduplicatesetExperiencesfunctionalityextentvariedareainefficienciesgeneratingreportslimitedaccessibilityworkaroundscommonlyreportedCONCLUSIONS:CurrentapproachesalwaysallowcommunitydecisionmakingManyeffectivesolelytechnologicalsuggestneedinterorganizationalcollaborationincreasingcapacityworkflowredesignendusertrainingExperienceusingpractice:qualitativePublicHealthInformaticsimmunizationadministrationstatistics

Similar Articles

Cited By