Diagnostic capability of comprehensive handheld vs transthoracic echocardiography.

Michael W Cullen, Lori A Blauwet, Ori M Vatury, Sharon L Mulvagh, Thomas R Behrenbeck, Christopher G Scott, Patricia A Pellikka
Author Information
  1. Michael W Cullen: Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  2. Lori A Blauwet: Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  3. Ori M Vatury: Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  4. Sharon L Mulvagh: Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  5. Thomas R Behrenbeck: Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  6. Christopher G Scott: Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  7. Patricia A Pellikka: Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Electronic address: pellikka.patricia@mayo.edu.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic capability of handheld echocardiography (HHE) compared with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) performed and evaluated by experienced sonographers and expert echocardiographers.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of adult outpatients undergoing comprehensive TTE between July 9, 2012, and April 3, 2013. Experienced sonographers performed a detailed, standardized examination using a handheld ultrasound device that included 2-dimensional and color Doppler images from standard imaging windows. Images from TTE and HHE were independently interpreted by expert echocardiographers to whom the other study was masked. Agreement between the standard TTE and the HHE reports was analyzed.
RESULTS: The study group contained 190 patients (mean ± SD age, 62 ± 17 years; 49% male [n=93]). The κ values were 0.52 for left ventricular (LV) enlargement, 0.52 for right ventricular enlargement, 0.62 for regional wall motion abnormalities, 0.73 for aortic stenosis, and 0.61 for mitral regurgitation. Lin concordance correlation coefficients ranged from 0.89 for LV end-systolic diameter to 0.78 for LV end-diastolic diameter. In 51 patients (27%), echocardiographic findings were discordant between HHE and standard TTE. The most common discordant finding was the presence vs absence of any regional wall motion abnormalities. In discordant cases, HHE tended to underestimate, rather than overestimate, the severity of abnormal findings.
CONCLUSION: In experienced hands, HHE shows moderate correlation with standard TTE, but discordant findings were present in 27% of patients. Even when performed and interpreted by experienced operators, HHE should not be used as a surrogate for standard TTE.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01558518.

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT01558518

References

  1. Echocardiography. 2003 Jul;20(5):477-85 [PMID: 12848871]
  2. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Nov;54(10):1217-23 [PMID: 21039344]
  3. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Dec;23(12):1225-30 [PMID: 21111923]
  4. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Feb;24(2):117-24 [PMID: 21074362]
  5. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013 Mar;26(3):221-33 [PMID: 23439071]
  6. Echocardiography. 2012;29(1):1-6 [PMID: 22044766]
  7. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2012 Nov;13(11):700-7 [PMID: 22929564]
  8. Circ J. 2009 Jun;73(6):1092-6 [PMID: 19372623]
  9. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Dec;18(12):1440-63 [PMID: 16376782]
  10. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Feb;24(2):111-6 [PMID: 21126857]
  11. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Jun 15;37(8):2013-8 [PMID: 11419879]
  12. Fam Med. 2005 May;37(5):360-3 [PMID: 15883903]
  13. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Dec;14(12):1132-9 [PMID: 23708845]
  14. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007 Sep;20(9):1021-41 [PMID: 17765820]
  15. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 5;155(1):33-8 [PMID: 21727291]
  16. Echocardiography. 2010 Aug;27(7):759-64 [PMID: 20412264]
  17. Am J Cardiol. 2005 Oct 1;96(7):1002-6 [PMID: 16188532]
  18. Am J Cardiol. 2002 Dec 1;90(11):1273-5 [PMID: 12450617]
  19. Am J Med. 2009 Jan;122(1):35-41 [PMID: 19114170]
  20. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013 Jun;26(6):567-81 [PMID: 23711341]
  21. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011 Sep;12(9):665-70 [PMID: 21810825]
  22. Circulation. 1981 Oct;64(4):744-53 [PMID: 7273375]
  23. Am J Cardiol. 2007 Jun 1;99(11):1614-6 [PMID: 17531592]
  24. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jan 22;51(3):335-8 [PMID: 18206749]
  25. Circulation. 1998 Apr 21;97(15):1474-80 [PMID: 9576428]
  26. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Apr;24(4):455-64 [PMID: 21440216]
  27. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Jan;24(1):1-10 [PMID: 21172594]
  28. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008 Nov;9(6):721-5 [PMID: 18579497]
  29. J Hosp Med. 2010 Mar;5(3):163-7 [PMID: 20235285]
  30. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Dec;24(12):1319-24 [PMID: 21885245]
  31. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Jul;1(4):749-53 [PMID: 17699282]

Grants

  1. UL1 TR000135/NCATS NIH HHS
  2. UL1 TR 000135/NCATS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Echocardiography
Echocardiography, Doppler
Echocardiography, Doppler, Color
Female
Heart Diseases
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Point-of-Care Systems
Prospective Studies

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0HHETTE0standarddiscordanthandheldechocardiographyperformedexperiencedstudypatientsLVfindingscapabilitytransthoracicsonographersexpertechocardiographerscomprehensiveinterpreted±6252ventricularenlargementregionalwallmotionabnormalitiescorrelationdiameter27%vsOBJECTIVE:assessdiagnosticcomparedevaluatedPATIENTSANDMETHODS:conductedprospectiveadultoutpatientsundergoingJuly92012April32013Experienceddetailedstandardizedexaminationusingultrasounddeviceincluded2-dimensionalcolorDopplerimagesimagingwindowsImagesindependentlymaskedAgreementreportsanalyzedRESULTS:groupcontained190meanSDage17years49%male[n=93]κvaluesleftright73aorticstenosis61mitralregurgitationLinconcordancecoefficientsranged89end-systolic78end-diastolic51echocardiographiccommonfindingpresenceabsencecasestendedunderestimateratheroverestimateseverityabnormalCONCLUSION:handsshowsmoderatepresentEvenoperatorsusedsurrogateTRIALREGISTRATION:clinicaltrialsgovIdentifier:NCT01558518Diagnostic

Similar Articles

Cited By