What lies beneath: a comparison of reading aloud in pure alexia and semantic dementia.

Anna M Woollams, Paul Hoffman, Daniel J Roberts, Matthew A Lambon Ralph, Karalyn E Patterson
Author Information
  1. Anna M Woollams: a School of Psychological Sciences , University of Manchester , Manchester , UK.

Abstract

Exaggerated effects of word length upon reading-aloud performance define pure alexia, but have also been observed in semantic dementia. Some researchers have proposed a reading-specific account, whereby performance in these two disorders reflects the same cause: impaired orthographic processing. In contrast, according to the primary systems view of acquired reading disorders, pure alexia results from a basic visual processing deficit, whereas degraded semantic knowledge undermines reading performance in semantic dementia. To explore the source of reading deficits in these two disorders, we compared the reading performance of 10 pure alexic and 10 semantic dementia patients, matched in terms of overall severity of reading deficit. The results revealed comparable frequency effects on reading accuracy, but weaker effects of regularity in pure alexia than in semantic dementia. Analysis of error types revealed a higher rate of letter-based errors and a lower rate of regularization responses in pure alexia than in semantic dementia. Error responses were most often words in pure alexia but most often nonwords in semantic dementia. Although all patients made some letter substitution errors, these were characterized by visual similarity in pure alexia and phonological similarity in semantic dementia. Overall, the data indicate that the reading deficits in pure alexia and semantic dementia arise from impairments of visual processing and knowledge of word meaning, respectively. The locus and mechanisms of these impairments are placed within the context of current connectionist models of reading.

Keywords

References

  1. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2011 May;28(3-4):251-75 [PMID: 22185237]
  2. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1998 Mar 1;15(1-2):203-238 [PMID: 28657523]
  3. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1982 Aug;34(Pt 3):411-41 [PMID: 6890219]
  4. Neuropsychologia. 2012 Oct;50(12):2773-2788 [PMID: 22841988]
  5. Neuropsychologia. 2008 Jan 31;46(2):649-58 [PMID: 17961610]
  6. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1995 Jan;1(1):104-10 [PMID: 9375215]
  7. J Cogn Neurosci. 1993 Winter;5(1):89-117 [PMID: 23972122]
  8. Nat Neurosci. 2001 May;4(5):533-9 [PMID: 11319563]
  9. Brain. 1992 Dec;115 ( Pt 6):1783-806 [PMID: 1486461]
  10. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98 [PMID: 1202204]
  11. Cereb Cortex. 2011 Oct;21(10):2307-12 [PMID: 21368088]
  12. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 May;17(5):210-9 [PMID: 23608364]
  13. Brain Lang. 2013 Aug;126(2):188-92 [PMID: 23774289]
  14. Cereb Cortex. 2012 Dec;22(12):2715-32 [PMID: 22235035]
  15. Neuron. 2003 Mar 27;37(6):1027-41 [PMID: 12670430]
  16. Brain. 2011 Jul;134(Pt 7):2025-35 [PMID: 21646331]
  17. Neuropsychologia. 2008 Aug;46(10):2503-14 [PMID: 18499196]
  18. Cereb Cortex. 2009 Dec;19(12):2880-90 [PMID: 19366870]
  19. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2006 Dec 1;23(8):1130-61 [PMID: 21049371]
  20. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jun;15(6):246-53 [PMID: 21549634]
  21. Psychol Rev. 2010 Jan;117(1):273-81; discussion 282-3 [PMID: 20063974]
  22. Cereb Cortex. 2013 Jul;23(7):1673-84 [PMID: 22693338]
  23. Cortex. 2010 Feb;46(2):242-55 [PMID: 19446802]
  24. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2013;23(3):429-62 [PMID: 23452100]
  25. Neuron. 2007 Jul 5;55(1):143-56 [PMID: 17610823]
  26. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999 Apr;9(2):235-9 [PMID: 10322178]
  27. Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jun 11;45(10):2246-57 [PMID: 17433379]
  28. Neuropsychologia. 1993 May;31(5):435-58 [PMID: 8502378]
  29. Cereb Cortex. 2013 Nov;23(11):2568-80 [PMID: 22923086]
  30. Vision Res. 1971 May;11(5):459-74 [PMID: 5558929]
  31. Cortex. 2013 Oct;49(9):2294-306 [PMID: 23578749]
  32. Psychol Rev. 2004 Jan;111(1):205-35 [PMID: 14756594]
  33. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2011 Mar;28(2):65-108 [PMID: 22122115]
  34. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Aug;69(2):178-86 [PMID: 10896690]
  35. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2007 Jun;24(4):393-418 [PMID: 18416498]
  36. Neuropsychology. 2009 Jul;23(4):492-9 [PMID: 19586212]
  37. Neurology. 2004 Jun 22;62(12):2221-9 [PMID: 15210886]
  38. Neuropsychologia. 1998 Nov;36(11):1115-32 [PMID: 9842758]
  39. Cogn Psychol. 2012 Jun;64(4):267-91 [PMID: 22343366]
  40. Neurology. 1998 Dec;51(6):1546-54 [PMID: 9855500]
  41. Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):473-81 [PMID: 12880781]
  42. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):499-503 [PMID: 9176962]
  43. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Feb;57(2):211-6 [PMID: 8126508]
  44. J Cogn Neurosci. 1994 Winter;6(1):57-69 [PMID: 23962330]
  45. Neuropsychologia. 1996 Dec;34(12):1165-74 [PMID: 8951827]
  46. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Feb;18(2):169-83 [PMID: 16494679]
  47. Brain Lang. 2000 Aug;74(1):48-69 [PMID: 10924216]
  48. Brain Lang. 1989 Apr;36(3):357-76 [PMID: 2706444]
  49. Neuron. 2002 Apr 25;34(3):479-90 [PMID: 11988177]
  50. Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(2):143-63 [PMID: 10660226]
  51. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2002 Sep 1;19(6):535-55 [PMID: 20957553]
  52. Brain Lang. 1996 Jun;53(3):390-407 [PMID: 8798335]
  53. Neuropsychologia. 1998 Aug;36(8):775-84 [PMID: 9751441]
  54. Neuropsychologia. 2009 Jun;47(7):1733-44 [PMID: 19397869]
  55. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1998 Mar 1;15(1-2):7-51 [PMID: 28657524]
  56. Neuroimage. 2006 Apr 15;30(3):1010-20 [PMID: 16300967]
  57. Neuropsychologia. 1992 Dec;30(12):1025-40 [PMID: 1484600]
  58. Psychol Rev. 2007 Apr;114(2):316-39 [PMID: 17500629]
  59. Neuropsychologia. 1992 Apr;30(4):301-14 [PMID: 1603295]
  60. Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jul;48(9):2437-46 [PMID: 20406652]
  61. Vision Res. 2006 Dec;46(28):4646-74 [PMID: 16808957]
  62. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2283-98 [PMID: 21554892]
  63. Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Apr 1;6(4):176-184 [PMID: 11912041]
  64. Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(2):125-42 [PMID: 10660225]
  65. Cereb Cortex. 2014 Apr;24(4):1102-18 [PMID: 23250954]
  66. Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(6):833-46 [PMID: 15716156]
  67. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):1294-1301 [PMID: 21236271]
  68. J Psycholinguist Res. 1973 Jul;2(3):175-99 [PMID: 4795473]
  69. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1991 Dec;120(4):339-57 [PMID: 1837294]
  70. Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(9):1207-15 [PMID: 10865096]
  71. Brain. 1979 Mar;102(1):43-63 [PMID: 427532]
  72. Brain. 1980 Mar;103(1):99-112 [PMID: 6244876]
  73. Brain. 2002 May;125(Pt 5):1054-69 [PMID: 11960895]
  74. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2005 Sep;22(6):695-717 [PMID: 21038273]
  75. Psychol Rev. 2004 Jul;111(3):662-720 [PMID: 15250780]
  76. Brain Lang. 2006 Sep;98(3):251-63 [PMID: 16781767]
  77. Brain. 2006 Nov;129(Pt 11):3066-80 [PMID: 17071925]
  78. Psychol Rev. 2010 Jan;117(1):256-71; discussion 271-2 [PMID: 20063972]
  79. Psychol Rev. 1996 Jan;103(1):56-115 [PMID: 8650300]
  80. Brain. 2010 Nov;133(11):3256-68 [PMID: 20952377]
  81. Psychol Sci. 2005 Jul;16(7):535-41 [PMID: 16008786]

Grants

  1. MR/J004146/1/Medical Research Council
  2. 097820/Wellcome Trust

MeSH Term

Aged
Alexia, Pure
Dyslexia
Frontotemporal Dementia
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Reaction Time
Reading
Semantics
Visual Perception
Vocabulary

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0semanticdementiareadingpurealexiaperformanceeffectsdisordersprocessingvisualwordtworesultsdeficitknowledgedeficits10patientsrevealedrateerrorsresponsesoftensimilarityimpairmentsaloudExaggeratedlengthuponreading-alouddefinealsoobservedresearchersproposedreading-specificaccountwherebyreflectscause:impairedorthographiccontrastaccordingprimarysystemsviewacquiredbasicwhereasdegradedunderminesexploresourcecomparedalexicmatchedtermsoverallseveritycomparablefrequencyaccuracyweakerregularityAnalysiserrortypeshigherletter-basedlowerregularizationErrorwordsnonwordsAlthoughmadelettersubstitutioncharacterizedphonologicalOveralldataindicatearisemeaningrespectivelylocusmechanismsplacedwithincontextcurrentconnectionistmodelsliesbeneath:comparisonLetter-by-letterPureReadingSemanticSurfacedyslexia

Similar Articles

Cited By