Auditory thalamus and auditory cortex are equally modulated by context during flexible categorization of sounds.

Santiago Jaramillo, Katharine Borges, Anthony M Zador
Author Information
  1. Santiago Jaramillo: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724.

Abstract

In a dynamic world, animals must adapt rapidly to changes in the meaning of environmental cues. Such changes can influence the neural representation of sensory stimuli. Previous studies have shown that associating a stimulus with a reward or punishment can modulate neural activity in the auditory cortex (AC) and its thalamic input, the medial geniculate body (MGB). However, it is not known whether changes in stimulus-action associations alone can also modulate neural responses in these areas. We designed a categorization task for rats in which the boundary that separated low- from high-frequency sounds varied several times within a behavioral session, thus allowing us to manipulate the action associated with some sounds without changing the associated reward. We developed a computational model that accounted for the rats' performance and compared predictions from this model with sound-evoked responses from single neurons in AC and MGB in animals performing this task. We found that the responses of 15% of AC neurons and 16% of MGB neurons were modulated by changes in stimulus-action association and that the magnitude of the modulation was comparable between the two brain areas. Our results suggest that the AC and thalamus play only a limited role in mediating changes in associations between acoustic stimuli and behavioral responses.

Keywords

References

  1. J Neurosci. 1992 Nov;12(11):4501-9 [PMID: 1331362]
  2. Hear Res. 2007 Jul;229(1-2):204-12 [PMID: 17208397]
  3. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005 Aug;15(4):470-7 [PMID: 16009546]
  4. J Neurosci. 2012 Jul 4;32(27):9323-34 [PMID: 22764239]
  5. Neural Comput. 2007 May;19(5):1295-312 [PMID: 17381267]
  6. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:649-711 [PMID: 10845078]
  7. Nat Neurosci. 2003 Nov;6(11):1216-23 [PMID: 14583754]
  8. J Neurosci. 1984 Jan;4(1):298-308 [PMID: 6693945]
  9. Science. 1959 May 8;129(3358):1279-80 [PMID: 13658956]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 9;106(23):9471-6 [PMID: 19458263]
  11. Neural Comput. 2014 Nov;26(11):2379-94 [PMID: 25149694]
  12. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1993 Aug;3(4):570-7 [PMID: 8219724]
  13. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Jun;32(3):733-54 [PMID: 16822135]
  14. Nat Neurosci. 2011 Feb;14(2):246-51 [PMID: 21170056]
  15. Neuron. 2006 Aug 3;51(3):359-68 [PMID: 16880130]
  16. J Neurosci Methods. 1980 Dec;3(2):129-49 [PMID: 6110810]
  17. Behav Brain Res. 2009 Dec 7;204(2):396-409 [PMID: 19110006]
  18. Nat Neurosci. 2009 May;12(5):646-54 [PMID: 19363491]
  19. J Neurosci. 2005 Jul 20;25(29):6797-806 [PMID: 16033889]
  20. Nature. 2001 Sep 6;413(6851):67-70 [PMID: 11544526]
  21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 7;109(6):2144-9 [PMID: 22308415]
  22. J Neurophysiol. 1982 Nov;48(5):1201-13 [PMID: 7175567]
  23. Nat Neurosci. 2005 Sep;8(9):1203-9 [PMID: 16116444]
  24. Brain Res. 1976 Nov 19;117(1):51-68 [PMID: 825193]
  25. Behav Neurosci. 1991 Oct;105(5):618-39 [PMID: 1815615]
  26. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Jan;8(1):26-32 [PMID: 14697400]
  27. J Comp Neurol. 2002 Nov 25;453(4):345-60 [PMID: 12389207]
  28. J Neurosci. 2012 Feb 29;32(9):3193-210 [PMID: 22378891]
  29. Vis Neurosci. 1996 Jan-Feb;13(1):87-100 [PMID: 8730992]
  30. Science. 1972 Aug 4;177(4047):449-51 [PMID: 4625421]
  31. Nature. 2003 Jan 23;421(6921):370-3 [PMID: 12540901]
  32. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Jul;72(5):1218-27 [PMID: 20601702]
  33. Schizophr Bull. 1988;14(2):179-83 [PMID: 3059467]
  34. Nature. 2013 May 23;497(7450):482-5 [PMID: 23636333]

Grants

  1. R01 DC012565/NIDCD NIH HHS
  2. 5R01DC012565-02/NIDCD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Acoustic Stimulation
Animals
Auditory Cortex
Auditory Perception
Discrimination, Psychological
Evoked Potentials, Auditory
Geniculate Bodies
Models, Neurological
Neurons
Rats
Rats, Long-Evans
Reward
Sound

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0changesACresponsescanneuralrewardauditoryMGBcategorizationsoundsneuronsanimalsstimulimodulatecortexstimulus-actionassociationsareastaskbehavioralassociatedmodelmodulatedassociationthalamusdynamicworldmustadaptrapidlymeaningenvironmentalcuesinfluencerepresentationsensoryPreviousstudiesshownassociatingstimuluspunishmentactivitythalamicinputmedialgeniculatebodyHoweverknownwhetheralonealsodesignedratsboundaryseparatedlow-high-frequencyvariedseveraltimeswithinsessionthusallowingusmanipulateactionwithoutchangingdevelopedcomputationalaccountedrats'performancecomparedpredictionssound-evokedsingleperformingfound15%16%magnitudemodulationcomparabletwobrainresultssuggestplaylimitedrolemediatingacousticAuditoryequallycontextflexibleflexibilitystimulus–action

Similar Articles

Cited By