Motivational interviewing targeting diet and physical activity improves adherence to paediatric obesity treatment: results from the MI Values randomized controlled trial.

M K Bean, P Powell, A Quinoy, K Ingersoll, E P Wickham, S E Mazzeo
Author Information
  1. M K Bean: Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Richmond at Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA; Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adherence is a challenge in obesity treatment. Motivational interviewing (MI) may promote patient adherence. MI Values is a randomized controlled trial of MI implemented as an adjunct to an adolescent obesity treatment [Teaching Encouragement Exercise Nutrition Support (T.E.E.N.S.)].
OBJECTIVE: Assess effects of MI Values on T.E.E.N.S. attrition and adherence.
METHODS: Participants were randomized to MI (n = 58) or control (n = 41). At weeks 1 and 10, MI participants had brief MI sessions; controls viewed health education videos. All participants continued with T.E.E.N.S. (biweekly dietitian and behavioural support visits; 3 times per week supervised physical activity). Assessments were repeated at baseline, 3 and 6 months. T-tests and chi-square analyses examined T.E.E.N.S. attrition and adherence by group.
RESULTS: Adolescents (N = 99) were primarily African-American (73%) females (74%); age = 13.8 ± 1.8 years, body mass index percentile = 98.0 ± 1.2. Compared with controls, MI participants had greater 3-month adherence overall (89.2% vs. 81.0%, P = 0.040), and to dietitian (91.3% vs. 84.0%; P = 0.046) and behavioural support (92.9% vs. 85.2%; P = 0.041) visits, and greater 6-month adherence overall (84.4% vs. 76.2%, P = 0.026) and to behavioural support visits (87.5% vs. 78.8%, P = 0.011).
CONCLUSIONS: MI enhanced adherence to this obesity intervention. MI Values is the first study to examine the impact of MI on treatment adherence among obese, primarily African-American adolescents.

Keywords

References

  1. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2009 Jun;7(3):179-86 [PMID: 19450141]
  2. Health Educ Res. 2005 Aug;20(4):439-47 [PMID: 15598664]
  3. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2009;4(3):130-3 [PMID: 18720175]
  4. J Pediatr. 2004 Apr;144(4):466-70 [PMID: 15069394]
  5. Diabetes Educ. 2004 May-Jun;30(3):404-6, 408-10, 414-6 passim [PMID: 15208841]
  6. Obes Rev. 2011 Sep;12(9):709-23 [PMID: 21692966]
  7. JAMA. 2012 Feb 1;307(5):483-90 [PMID: 22253364]
  8. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Dec;106(12):2024-33 [PMID: 17126634]
  9. Pediatrics. 2007 Dec;120 Suppl 4:S164-92 [PMID: 18055651]
  10. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2011 May;50(5):408-16 [PMID: 21224253]
  11. J Pediatr Psychol. 2013 Oct;38(9):944-53 [PMID: 23671058]
  12. Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 Sep;32(5):667-74 [PMID: 21554994]
  13. Obes Rev. 2011 May;12(5):e273-81 [PMID: 20880126]
  14. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2008 Oct;29(5):417-28 [PMID: 18852613]
  15. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Aug;165(8):714-22 [PMID: 21464376]
  16. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD001872 [PMID: 19160202]
  17. J Adolesc Health. 2012 Feb;50(2):201-3 [PMID: 22265118]
  18. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Dec;93(12):4600-5 [PMID: 18782881]
  19. Obes Res. 2005 Oct;13(10):1739-48 [PMID: 16286521]
  20. Health Psychol. 2000 Jan;19(1S):5-16 [PMID: 10709944]
  21. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009 Aug;34(7):782-93 [PMID: 19064607]
  22. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 Dec;159(12):1173-80 [PMID: 16330743]
  23. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 May;161(5):495-501 [PMID: 17485627]
  24. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:91-111 [PMID: 17716083]

Grants

  1. K23 HD053742/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. UL1 TR000058/NCATS NIH HHS
  3. UL1TR000058/NCATS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adolescent Behavior
Body Mass Index
Exercise
Feeding Behavior
Female
Health Education
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Promotion
Humans
Male
Motivational Interviewing
Patient Compliance
Pediatric Obesity
Weight Loss

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0adherenceMIEobesityvsP = 0treatmentMI ValuesTNSMotivationalinterviewingrandomizedparticipantsbehaviouralsupportvisits2%controlledtrialattritioncontrolsdietitian3physicalactivityprimarilyAfrican-Americangreateroverall0%84paediatricBACKGROUND:Adherencechallengemaypromotepatientimplementedadjunctadolescent[TeachingEncouragementExerciseNutritionSupport]OBJECTIVE:AssesseffectsMETHODS:Participantsn = 58controln = 41weeks110briefsessionsviewedhealtheducationvideoscontinuedbiweeklytimesperweeksupervisedAssessmentsrepeatedbaseline6monthsT-testschi-squareanalysesexaminedgroupRESULTS:AdolescentsN = 9973%females74%age = 138 ± 18yearsbodymassindexpercentile = 980 ± 12Compared3-month8981040913%046929%850416-month4%76026875%788%011CONCLUSIONS:enhancedinterventionfirststudyexamineimpactamongobeseadolescentstargetingdietimprovestreatment:results

Similar Articles

Cited By