A qualitative exploration of fishing and fish consumption in the Gullah/Geechee culture.

Jamelle H Ellis, Daniela B Friedman, Robin Puett, Geoffrey I Scott, Dwayne E Porter
Author Information
  1. Jamelle H Ellis: Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Suite 518, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA, Jamelle.ellis3@gmail.com.

Abstract

The Gullah/Geechee (G/G) heritage is rooted in a culture largely dependent on fish and seafood as a primary food source. Research suggests that African-American (AA) fishers in the Southeastern US consume larger amounts of fish, potentially exposing them to higher environmental contaminant levels. This in-depth study was conducted to explore G/G and AA Sea Island attitudes, perceptions, and cultural beliefs about fishing in one urban and two rural South Carolina coastal counties. Results indicated that study participants in rural counties had slightly different perspectives of fishing (e.g. fishing as an essential dietary supplement) than in urban counties where fishing was viewed more as relaxation. Major misperceptions existed in all counties between fish consumption advisories related to pollution versus harvesting restrictions associated with fishing regulations. Providing clear, culturally tailored health messages regarding fish advisories will promote more informed choices about fish consumption that will minimize potential exposures to environmental pollutants.

References

  1. Sci Total Environ. 2001 Sep 28;277(1-3):77-86 [PMID: 11589410]
  2. Risk Anal. 1999 Jun;19(3):427-38 [PMID: 10765415]
  3. Soc Sci Med. 2007 Nov;65(9):1839-52 [PMID: 17614174]
  4. Environ Res. 2009 Aug;109(6):753-9 [PMID: 19477438]
  5. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2010;70(2):119-43 [PMID: 20405586]
  6. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012 Mar-Apr;44(2):154-9 [PMID: 22037147]
  7. Environ Health Perspect. 2011 Feb;119(2):245-51 [PMID: 20980220]
  8. Public Health Rep. 1994 Jan-Feb;109(1):86-92 [PMID: 8303020]
  9. J Community Health. 2013 Aug;38(4):642-51 [PMID: 23468319]
  10. Public Health Rep. 2003 Jul-Aug;118(4):293-302 [PMID: 12815076]
  11. Fam Community Health. 2006 Jan-Mar;29(1 Suppl):20S-27S [PMID: 16344633]
  12. CA Cancer J Clin. 1998 May-Jun;48(3):151-62 [PMID: 9594918]
  13. J Health Commun. 2012;17(10):1151-70 [PMID: 22808914]
  14. Prev Sci. 2011 Sep;12(3):333-8 [PMID: 21678029]
  15. Health Educ Behav. 2006 Jun;33(3):352-73 [PMID: 16699125]
  16. Gerontologist. 2013 Dec;53(6):973-84 [PMID: 23362210]
  17. Environ Res. 2011 Nov;111(8):1037-45 [PMID: 21851935]
  18. Gerontologist. 2011 Jun;51 Suppl 1:S33-45 [PMID: 21565817]
  19. Health Educ Res. 2010 Apr;25(2):306-15 [PMID: 19261690]
  20. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Oct;113(10):1325-9 [PMID: 16203241]
  21. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Dec;85(3):508-15 [PMID: 21306856]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Animals
Culture
Female
Fishes
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Motivation
Occupations
Qualitative Research
Rural Population
Seafood
South Carolina
Urban Population
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0fishfishingcountiesconsumptionGullah/GeecheeG/GcultureAAenvironmentalstudyurbanruraladvisorieswillheritagerootedlargelydependentseafoodprimaryfoodsourceResearchsuggestsAfrican-AmericanfishersSoutheasternUSconsumelargeramountspotentiallyexposinghighercontaminantlevelsin-depthconductedexploreSeaIslandattitudesperceptionsculturalbeliefsonetwoSouthCarolinacoastalResultsindicatedparticipantsslightlydifferentperspectivesegessentialdietarysupplementviewedrelaxationMajormisperceptionsexistedrelatedpollutionversusharvestingrestrictionsassociatedregulationsProvidingclearculturallytailoredhealthmessagesregardingpromoteinformedchoicesminimizepotentialexposurespollutantsqualitativeexploration

Similar Articles

Cited By