Subjective numeracy and preference to stay with the status quo.

Liana Fraenkel, Meaghan Cunningham, Ellen Peters
Author Information
  1. Liana Fraenkel: Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (LF)
  2. Meaghan Cunningham: Yale University School of Nursing, New Haven, CT (MC)
  3. Ellen Peters: Ohio State University, Columbus, OH (EP)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preference for the status quo, or clinical inertia, is a barrier to implementing treat-to-target protocols in patients with chronic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objectives of this study were to examine the influence of subjective numeracy on RA-patient preference for the status quo and to determine whether age modifies this relationship.
METHODS: RA patients participated in a single face-to-face interview. Numeracy was measured using the Subjective Numeracy Scale. Treatment preference was measured using Adaptive Conjoint Analysis.
RESULTS: Of 205 eligible subjects, 156 agreed to participate. Higher subjective numeracy was associated with lower preference for the status quo in a regression model including race, employment, and use of biologics (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.71 [0.52-0.95], P = 0.02). Higher subjective numeracy was protective against status quo preferences among subjects younger than 65 years (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.64 (0.43-0.94), P = 0.02) but not among older subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: Subjective numeracy is independently associated with younger, but not older, RA patients' preferences for the status quo. Our results add to the literature demonstrating age and numeracy differences in treatment preferences and medical decision-making processes.

Keywords

References

  1. N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30;329(14):977-86 [PMID: 8366922]
  2. J Cardiometab Syndr. 2006 Fall;1(5):301-7 [PMID: 17679791]
  3. J Rheumatol. 2010 Aug 1;37(8):1570-8 [PMID: 20595287]
  4. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jun 15;59(6):762-84 [PMID: 18512708]
  5. BMJ. 2010 Jan 19;340:c112 [PMID: 20085970]
  6. Psychol Sci. 2014 Mar;25(3):753-61 [PMID: 24452604]
  7. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jul;68(7):1136-45 [PMID: 18753157]
  8. Circulation. 2008 Mar 18;117(11):1361-8 [PMID: 18316489]
  9. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2007 Dec;9(12):937-43 [PMID: 18046098]
  10. J Health Commun. 2008 Sep;13(6):583-95 [PMID: 18726814]
  11. Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):672-80 [PMID: 17641137]
  12. J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 3:157-68 [PMID: 21154091]
  13. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 May;64(5):625-39 [PMID: 22473917]
  14. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Jul;56(7):2135-42 [PMID: 17599730]
  15. J Health Commun. 2008 Jul-Aug;13(5):501-17 [PMID: 18661390]
  16. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Oct;50(10):1729-31 [PMID: 21933791]
  17. Adv Ther. 2007 May-Jun;24(3):545-59 [PMID: 17660163]
  18. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Nov;49(11):2154-64 [PMID: 20671022]
  19. Am J Health Behav. 2007 Sep-Oct;31 Suppl 1:S47-56 [PMID: 17931136]
  20. J Rheumatol. 2010 Dec;37(12):2466-8 [PMID: 20810513]
  21. Psychol Bull. 2009 Nov;135(6):943-73 [PMID: 19883143]
  22. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Dec 1;127(11):966-72 [PMID: 9412301]
  23. JAMA. 1993 Jul 7;270(1):72-6 [PMID: 8510300]
  24. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Aug;21(4):789-804 [PMID: 17678835]
  25. Risk Anal. 1994 Dec;14(6):1101-8 [PMID: 7846319]
  26. Med Care. 2009 Mar;47(3):350-5 [PMID: 19165120]
  27. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Jun;69(6):964-75 [PMID: 20444750]
  28. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Apr;1128:1-7 [PMID: 18469208]
  29. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Apr 15;61(4):413-8 [PMID: 19333986]

Grants

  1. K24 AR060231/NIAMS NIH HHS
  2. AR060231-01/NIAMS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Age Factors
Aged
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Decision Making
Female
Health Literacy
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Patient Preference
Severity of Illness Index
Socioeconomic Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0statusquonumeracy0preference=RAsubjectiveSubjectivesubjectspreferencespatientsageNumeracymeasuredusingHigherassociatedadjustedoddsratio[95%confidenceinterval]P02amongyoungerolderBACKGROUND:Preferenceclinicalinertiabarrierimplementingtreat-to-targetprotocolschronicdiseasesrheumatoidarthritisobjectivesstudyexamineinfluenceRA-patientdeterminewhethermodifiesrelationshipMETHODS:participatedsingleface-to-faceinterviewScaleTreatmentAdaptiveConjointAnalysisRESULTS:205eligible156agreedparticipatelowerregressionmodelincludingraceemploymentusebiologics71[052-095]protective65years6443-094CONCLUSIONS:independentlypatients'resultsaddliteraturedemonstratingdifferencestreatmentmedicaldecision-makingprocessesstayagingdecisionmakingbias

Similar Articles

Cited By