The Influence of Serial Carbohydrate Mouth Rinsing on Power Output during a Cycle Sprint.

Shaun M Phillips, Scott Findlay, Mykolas Kavaliauskas, Marie Clare Grant
Author Information
  1. Shaun M Phillips: Abertay University, Division of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Dundee , Scotland, UK.
  2. Scott Findlay: Abertay University, Division of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Dundee , Scotland, UK.
  3. Mykolas Kavaliauskas: Abertay University, Division of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Dundee , Scotland, UK.
  4. Marie Clare Grant: Abertay University, Division of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Dundee , Scotland, UK.

Abstract

The objective of the study was to investigate the influence of serial administration of a carbohydrate (CHO) mouth rinse on performance, metabolic and perceptual responses during a cycle sprint. Twelve physically active males (mean (± SD) age: 23.1 (3.0) years, height: 1.83 (0.07) m, body mass (BM): 86.3 (13.5) kg) completed the following mouth rinse trials in a randomized, counterbalanced, double-blind fashion; 1. 8 x 5 second rinses with a 25 ml CHO (6% w/v maltodextrin) solution, 2. 8 x 5 second rinses with a 25 ml placebo (PLA) solution. Following mouth rinse administration, participants completed a 30 second sprint on a cycle ergometer against a 0.075 g·kg(-1) BM resistance. Eight participants achieved a greater peak power output (PPO) in the CHO trial, resulting in a significantly greater PPO compared with PLA (13.51 ± 2.19 vs. 13.20 ± 2.14 W·kg(-1), p < 0.05). Magnitude inference analysis reported a likely benefit (81% likelihood) of the CHO mouth rinse on PPO. In the CHO trial, mean power output (MPO) showed a trend for being greater in the first 5 seconds of the sprint and lower for the remainder of the sprint compared with the PLA trial (p > 0.05). No significant between-trials difference was reported for fatigue index, perceived exertion, arousal and nausea levels, or blood lactate and glucose concentrations. Serial administration of a CHO mouth rinse may significantly improve PPO during a cycle sprint. This improvement appears confined to the first 5 seconds of the sprint, and may come at a greater relative cost for the remainder of the sprint. Key pointsThe paper demonstrates that repeated administration of a carbohydrate mouth rinse can significantly improve peak power output during a single 30 second cycle sprint.The ergogenic effect of the carbohydrate mouth rinse may relate to the duration of exposure of the oral cavity to the mouth rinse, and associated greater stimulation of oral carbohydrate receptors.The significant increase in peak power output with the carbohydrate mouth rinse may come at a relative cost for the remainder of the sprint, evidenced by non-significantly lower mean power output and a greater fatigue index in the carbohydrate vs. placebo trial.Serial administration of a carbohydrate mouth rinse may be beneficial for sprint athletes as a method of performance enhancement that minimizes the risk of performance decrement through body mass increase and gastrointestinal disturbances associated with ingesting carbohydrate solutions.

Keywords

References

  1. Sports Med. 2001;31(3):211-34 [PMID: 11286357]
  2. Pflugers Arch. 2007 Jul;454(4):635-47 [PMID: 17333244]
  3. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Nov;37(11):1998-2005 [PMID: 16286872]
  4. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14(3):259-64 [PMID: 23578290]
  5. Nutrition. 2004 Jul-Aug;20(7-8):669-77 [PMID: 15212750]
  6. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2009 Aug;19(4):400-9 [PMID: 19827464]
  7. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Jul;109(5):811-21 [PMID: 20229023]
  8. Brain Res. 2010 Sep 2;1350:151-8 [PMID: 20388497]
  9. Int J Sport Nutr. 1992 Dec;2(4):317-27 [PMID: 1299501]
  10. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Dec;36(12):2107-11 [PMID: 15570147]
  11. Sports Med. 2011 Jun 1;41(6):449-61 [PMID: 21615187]
  12. Int J Sports Med. 1995 Oct;16(7):461-5 [PMID: 8550255]
  13. Int J Sport Nutr. 1995 Jun;5(2):151-8 [PMID: 7670454]
  14. J Physiol. 2009 Apr 15;587(Pt 8):1779-94 [PMID: 19237430]
  15. Appetite. 2008 Nov;51(3):622-7 [PMID: 18556090]
  16. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1987 Summer;11(2):231-40 [PMID: 3614791]
  17. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Aug;33(8):1399-403 [PMID: 11474345]
  18. J Sci Med Sport. 2011 Mar;14(2):162-7 [PMID: 20932798]
  19. Proc Nutr Soc. 2007 Feb;66(1):96-112 [PMID: 17343776]
  20. J Neurophysiol. 2001 Mar;85(3):1315-21 [PMID: 11248000]
  21. J Nutr Metab. 2011;2011:385962 [PMID: 22013515]
  22. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Feb;20(1):105-11 [PMID: 19000099]
  23. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013 Jun;38(6):633-7 [PMID: 23724880]
  24. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Aug;33(8):1270-8 [PMID: 11474326]
  25. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2013 Feb;23(1):48-56 [PMID: 22952137]
  26. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Apr;42(4):798-804 [PMID: 19952850]
  27. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2008 Dec;18(6):585-600 [PMID: 19164829]
  28. Physiol Behav. 2002 Jul;76(3):365-77 [PMID: 12117573]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0mouthrinsesprintcarbohydrateCHOgreateradministrationperformance05poweroutputmaycyclesecondPPOtrialmean±1132PLApeaksignificantlyremainderSerial3bodymassBMcompleted8xrinses25mlsolutionplaceboparticipants30-1comparedvsp05reportedfirstsecondslowersignificantfatigueindeximprovecomerelativecostTheoralassociatedincreaseexerciseobjectivestudyinvestigateinfluenceserialmetabolicperceptualresponsesTwelvephysicallyactivemalesSDage:23yearsheight:8307m:86kgfollowingtrialsrandomizedcounterbalanceddouble-blindfashion6%w/vmaltodextrinFollowingergometer075g·kgresistanceEightachievedresulting51192014W·kg<Magnitudeinferenceanalysislikelybenefit81%likelihoodMPOshowedtrend>between-trialsdifferenceperceivedexertionarousalnausealevelsbloodlactateglucoseconcentrationsimprovementappearsconfinedKeypointsThepaperdemonstratesrepeatedcansingleergogeniceffectrelatedurationexposurecavitystimulationreceptorsevidencednon-significantlybeneficialathletesmethodenhancementminimizesriskdecrementgastrointestinaldisturbancesingestingsolutionsInfluenceCarbohydrateMouthRinsingPowerOutputCycleSprintAnaerobicphysiologynutritionphysical

Similar Articles

Cited By