Real-world implementation and outcomes of health behavior and mental health assessment.

Hector P Rodriguez, Beth A Glenn, Tanya T Olmos, Alex H Krist, Stephanie L Shimada, Rodger Kessler, Suzanne Heurtin-Roberts, Roshan Bastani
Author Information
  1. Hector P Rodriguez: the Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles; the Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; The Center for Health Quality, Outcomes and Economic Research, VA Healthcare System, Bedford, MA; the Department of Family Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington; and the Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assessing patient-reported health behaviors is a critical first step in prioritizing prevention in primary care. We assessed the feasibility of point-of-care behavioral health assessment in 9 diverse primary care practices, including 4 federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), 4 practice-based research network practices, and a Department of Veterans Affairs practice.
METHODS: In this prospective mixed-methods study, practices were asked to integrate a standardized paper-based health behavior and mental health assessment into their workflow for ≥50 patients. We used 3 data sources to examine the implementation process: (1) patient responses to the health assessment, (2) patient feedback surveys about how assessments were used during encounters, and (3) postimplementation interviews.
RESULTS: Most nonurgent patients (71%) visiting the participating practices during the implementation period completed the health assessment, but reach varied by practice (range, 59% to 88%). Unhealthy diet, sedentary lifestyle, and stress were the most common patient problems, with similar frequencies observed across practices. The median number of "positive screens" per patient was similar among FQHCs (3.7 positives; standard deviation [SD], 1.8), practice-based research network practices (3.8 positives; SD, 1.9), and the Veterans Affairs clinic (4.1 positives; SD, 2.0). Primary care clinicians discussed assessment results with patients about half of the time (54%), with considerable variation between practices (range, 13% to 66%; lowest use among FQHC clinicians). Although clinicians were interested in routinely implementing assessments, many reported not feeling confident of having resources or support to address all patients' behavioral health needs.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary care practices will need to revamp their patient-reported data collection processes to integrate routine health behavior assessments. Implementation support will be required if health assessments are to be actively used as part of routine primary care.

Keywords

References

  1. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Sep 22;168(17):1843-52 [PMID: 18809810]
  2. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Nov;44(11):2071-6 [PMID: 22688832]
  3. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jan;40(1):67-71 [PMID: 21146770]
  4. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jul;24(7):783-8 [PMID: 19247718]
  5. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8 Suppl 1:S33-44; S92 [PMID: 20530393]
  6. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;25(5):701-11 [PMID: 22956706]
  7. Health Care Manage Rev. 2012 Apr-Jun;37(2):154-64 [PMID: 21775892]
  8. Neurology. 2012 Jun 5;78(23):1860-7 [PMID: 22573626]
  9. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jul 12;170(13):1155-60 [PMID: 20625025]
  10. Transl Behav Med. 2011 Mar;1(1):108-9 [PMID: 24073037]
  11. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug;19(4):575-82 [PMID: 22511015]
  12. Fam Syst Health. 2010 Jun;28(2):91-113 [PMID: 20695669]
  13. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Aug;144(8):930-8 [PMID: 23904581]
  14. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jul;21(7):698-703 [PMID: 16808769]
  15. Psychosomatics. 2009 Nov-Dec;50(6):613-21 [PMID: 19996233]
  16. Implement Sci. 2013 Jun 25;8:73 [PMID: 23799943]
  17. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Mar;31(3):497-504 [PMID: 22392660]
  18. Br J Nurs. 2011 Feb 24-Mar 9;20(4):220-7 [PMID: 21471860]
  19. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Apr;15(2):366-9 [PMID: 19335498]
  20. Ann Fam Med. 2007 Sep-Oct;5(5):457-61 [PMID: 17893389]

Grants

  1. U48 DP001946/NCCDPHP CDC HHS
  2. UL1 TR000124/NCATS NIH HHS
  3. UL1TR000124/NCATS NIH HHS
  4. U48DP001946/NCCDPHP CDC HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Health Behavior
Health Plan Implementation
Humans
Male
Mass Screening
Mental Health
Middle Aged
Needs Assessment
Nutrition Assessment
Primary Health Care
Prospective Studies

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthpracticesassessmentcare31patientassessmentsprimary4behaviorpatientsusedimplementationpositivesclinicianspatient-reportedbehavioral9FQHCspractice-basedresearchnetworkVeteransAffairspracticeintegratementaldata2rangesimilaramong8SDPrimarysupportwillroutineBACKGROUND:Assessingbehaviorscriticalfirststepprioritizingpreventionassessedfeasibilitypoint-of-carediverseincludingfederallyqualifiedcentersDepartmentMETHODS:prospectivemixed-methodsstudyaskedstandardizedpaper-basedworkflow≥50sourcesexamineprocess:responsesfeedbacksurveysencounterspostimplementationinterviewsRESULTS:nonurgent71%visitingparticipatingperiodcompletedreachvaried59%88%Unhealthydietsedentarylifestylestresscommonproblemsfrequenciesobservedacrossmediannumber"positivescreens"per7standarddeviation[SD]clinic0discussedresultshalftime54%considerablevariation13%66%lowestuseFQHCAlthoughinterestedroutinelyimplementingmanyreportedfeelingconfidentresourcesaddresspatients'needsCONCLUSIONS:needrevampcollectionprocessesImplementationrequiredactivelypartReal-worldoutcomesCommunicationMentalHealthPractice-basedResearchPreventionScreening

Similar Articles

Cited By