Sequential male mate choice under sperm competition risk.

Steven A Ramm, Paula Stockley
Author Information
  1. Steven A Ramm: Mammalian Behaviour and Evolution Group , Institute of Integrative Biology , University of Liverpool , Leahurst Campus , Chester High Road , Neston CH64 7TE , UK.
  2. Paula Stockley: Mammalian Behaviour and Evolution Group , Institute of Integrative Biology , University of Liverpool , Leahurst Campus , Chester High Road , Neston CH64 7TE , UK.

Abstract

Male eagerness to mate is a central paradigm of sexual selection theory. However, limited sperm supplies mean that male sexual restraint might sometimes be favored under promiscuous mating. Here, we demonstrate dynamic plasticity in male mating effort when females are encountered sequentially under varying sperm competition risk. Rather than showing consistent eagerness to mate, male house mice () instead tailor their mating effort according to likely reproductive payoffs. They are significantly less likely to mate when sperm competition is certain and potential reproductive payoffs low, but dramatically increase investment if they do choose to mate under such circumstances. By contrast, male mice are significantly more likely to mate in situations simulating extra-territorial copulations, where future risk of competition is high but so too are potential reproductive rewards. Differential mating propensity appears to be the primary mechanism by which male house mice allocate sperm adaptively under sperm competition risk because we find no evidence for facultative adjustment of sperm numbers per ejaculate or ejaculation frequency in response to female-related cues. We conclude that sequential male mate choice under sperm competition risk could be a widespread but often unappreciated mechanism of strategic sperm allocation.

Keywords

References

  1. J Comp Psychol. 1983 Mar;97(1):34-42 [PMID: 6872505]
  2. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Oct 22;268(1481):2097-102 [PMID: 11600073]
  3. Q Rev Biol. 1979 Sep;54(3):265-99 [PMID: 390600]
  4. Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Oct 22;271(1553):2115-21 [PMID: 15475330]
  5. Anim Behav. 1998 Sep;56(3):727-735 [PMID: 9784223]
  6. Mol Ecol. 2006 Nov;15(13):4141-51 [PMID: 17054508]
  7. Physiol Behav. 2009 Feb 16;96(2):253-61 [PMID: 18973768]
  8. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Mar;24(3):127-35 [PMID: 19185386]
  9. Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Apr 22;273(1589):917-22 [PMID: 16627276]
  10. Q Rev Biol. 1972 Mar;47(1):1-33 [PMID: 4553708]
  11. J Evol Biol. 2004 Sep;17(5):1048-57 [PMID: 15312077]
  12. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Feb;75(1):21-64 [PMID: 10740892]
  13. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Apr 7;268(1468):729-35 [PMID: 11321062]
  14. Nature. 1999 Oct 14;401(6754):661-2 [PMID: 10537103]
  15. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1963 Jun;56:636-44 [PMID: 14001051]
  16. Curr Biol. 2006 Apr 4;16(7):R239-41 [PMID: 16581496]
  17. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(1):e1003185 [PMID: 23341775]
  18. Biol Reprod. 1980 Sep;23(2):305-16 [PMID: 7417675]
  19. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 22;272(1561):365-73 [PMID: 15734690]
  20. Anim Learn Behav. 1975 Nov;3(4):329-36 [PMID: 1228022]
  21. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Dec;26(12):647-54 [PMID: 21890230]
  22. Heredity (Edinb). 1948 Dec;2(Pt. 3):349-68 [PMID: 18103134]
  23. Mol Ecol. 2011 Apr;20(7):1546-57 [PMID: 21291500]
  24. Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Feb 22;276(1657):745-51 [PMID: 18986975]
  25. Evolution. 1998 Feb;52(1):1-7 [PMID: 28568154]
  26. J Comp Psychol. 1985 Mar;99(1):98-107 [PMID: 3979031]
  27. Nature. 2003 Nov 6;426(6962):70-4 [PMID: 14603319]
  28. Curr Biol. 2005 Jul 12;15(13):1222-7 [PMID: 16005296]
  29. Behav Neural Biol. 1986 Jan;45(1):107-19 [PMID: 3754134]
  30. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011 Feb;86(1):1-13 [PMID: 20233168]
  31. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011 May;86(2):341-66 [PMID: 20636474]
  32. Curr Biol. 2007 Dec 18;17(24):2157-61 [PMID: 18060785]
  33. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Feb 28;361(1466):235-59 [PMID: 16612884]
  34. BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Nov 06;7:212 [PMID: 17986351]
  35. Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Sep 25;280(1771):20131691 [PMID: 24068355]
  36. Physiol Behav. 1991 Aug;50(2):393-5 [PMID: 1745685]
  37. Nature. 2001 Feb 8;409(6821):681-2 [PMID: 11217847]
  38. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010 Nov;85(4):897-934 [PMID: 20560928]
  39. Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 22;276(1659):1083-92 [PMID: 19129124]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0spermmatemalecompetitionmatingrisksexualeffortmicelikelyreproductivechoiceeagernessselectionhousepayoffssignificantlypotentialmechanismallocationMalecentralparadigmtheoryHoweverlimitedsuppliesmeanrestraintmightsometimesfavoredpromiscuousdemonstratedynamicplasticityfemalesencounteredsequentiallyvaryingRathershowingconsistentinsteadtailoraccordinglesscertainlowdramaticallyincreaseinvestmentchoosecircumstancescontrastsituationssimulatingextra-territorialcopulationsfuturehighrewardsDifferentialpropensityappearsprimaryallocateadaptivelyfindevidencefacultativeadjustmentnumbersperejaculateejaculationfrequencyresponsefemale-relatedcuesconcludesequentialwidespreadoftenunappreciatedstrategicSequentialcopulatorybehaviorsexrolesconflict

Similar Articles

Cited By