Learning from text benefits from enactment.

Ilaria Cutica, Francesco Ianì, Monica Bucciarelli
Author Information
  1. Ilaria Cutica: Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via A. di Rudinì, 8, 20140, Milan, Italy, ilaria.cutica@unimi.it.

Abstract

Classical studies on enactment have highlighted the beneficial effects of gestures performed in the encoding phase on memory for words and sentences, for both adults and children. In the present investigation, we focused on the role of enactment for learning from scientific texts among primary-school children. We assumed that enactment would favor the construction of a mental model of the text, and we verified the derived predictions that gestures at the time of encoding would result in greater numbers of correct recollections and discourse-based inferences at recall, as compared to no gestures (Exp. 1), and in a bias to confound paraphrases of the original text with the verbatim text in a recognition test (Exp. 2). The predictions were confirmed; hence, we argue in favor of a theoretical framework that accounts for the beneficial effects of enactment on memory for texts.

References

  1. J Gen Psychol. 2006 Jan;133(1):37-65 [PMID: 16475668]
  2. Mem Cognit. 1982 Mar;10(2):181-7 [PMID: 7087782]
  3. Mem Cognit. 2003 Apr;31(3):412-21 [PMID: 12795483]
  4. Lang Cogn. 2010 May 1;2(1):1-19 [PMID: 20640053]
  5. Science. 1990 Jan 5;247(4938):44-8 [PMID: 2403694]
  6. Psychol Rev. 1994 Jul;101(3):371-95 [PMID: 7938337]
  7. Dev Psychol. 2008 Sep;44(5):1277-87 [PMID: 18793062]
  8. Mem Cognit. 2002 Apr;30(3):363-71 [PMID: 12061757]
  9. Psychol Bull. 1998 Mar;123(2):162-85 [PMID: 9522683]
  10. Annu Rev Psychol. 1997;48:163-89 [PMID: 15012477]
  11. Am J Psychol. 2004 Fall;117(3):411-24 [PMID: 15457809]
  12. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Nov;5(6):664-74 [PMID: 21572548]
  13. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Nov;3(11):419-429 [PMID: 10529797]
  14. Cogn Psychol. 1985 Jul;17(3):324-363 [PMID: 25308975]
  15. Nature. 1970 Jul 25;227(5256):412 [PMID: 5428451]
  16. Am J Psychol. 2002 Spring;115(1):1-20 [PMID: 11868191]
  17. Dev Sci. 2012 Nov;15(6):876-84 [PMID: 23106741]
  18. Cognition. 2008 Feb;106(2):1047-58 [PMID: 17560971]
  19. Scand J Psychol. 2005 Aug;46(4):315-21 [PMID: 16014075]
  20. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Sep;30(5):969-87 [PMID: 15355130]
  21. Psychol Sci. 2001 Nov;12(6):516-22 [PMID: 11760141]
  22. Psychol Sci. 2009 Mar;20(3):267-72 [PMID: 19222810]
  23. Gesture (Amst). 2009;9(3):290-311 [PMID: 26740817]
  24. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Nov;136(4):539-50 [PMID: 17999569]
  25. Mem Cognit. 2001 Sep;29(6):820-7 [PMID: 11716055]
  26. Memory. 2009 May;17(4):374-85 [PMID: 19221926]
  27. Cogn Sci. 2008 Jul 8;32(5):921-35 [PMID: 21635357]

MeSH Term

Child
Child Development
Female
Gestures
Humans
Learning
Male
Mental Recall
Reading

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0enactmenttextgesturesbeneficialeffectsencodingmemorychildrentextsfavorpredictionsExpClassicalstudieshighlightedperformedphasewordssentencesadultspresentinvestigationfocusedrolelearningscientificamongprimary-schoolassumedconstructionmentalmodelverifiedderivedtimeresultgreaternumberscorrectrecollectionsdiscourse-basedinferencesrecallcompared1biasconfoundparaphrasesoriginalverbatimrecognitiontest2confirmedhencearguetheoreticalframeworkaccountsLearningbenefits

Similar Articles

Cited By