Modeling life satisfaction in spinal cord injury: the role of psychological resources.

Claudio Peter, Rachel Müller, Alarcos Cieza, Marcel W M Post, Christel M C van Leeuwen, Christina S Werner, Szilvia Geyh
Author Information
  1. Claudio Peter: Swiss Paraplegic Research (SPF), Nottwil, Switzerland, claudio.peter@paraplegie.ch.

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims of the study were (1) to examine the associations between the psychological resources general self-efficacy (GSE) and purpose in life (PIL), appraisals, coping and life satisfaction, and (2) to examine whether the effects of the psychological resources on life satisfaction are mediated by appraisals and coping, as proposed by the spinal cord injury adjustment model (SCIAM).
METHODS: Cross-sectional multicenter study conducted with persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) living in the community in Switzerland (N = 516). Pearson's correlations were calculated for aim 1, and structural equation modeling was conducted to address aim 2.
RESULTS: GSE (r = .48) and PIL (r = .58) were positively related to life satisfaction. The initial model corresponding to the SCIAM yielded a poor model fit. The final model had a good model fit [χ (2) = 66.0, df = 21, p < .01, RMSEA = .065 (90 % confidence interval .048-.082), CFI = .97] explaining 57 % of variance of life satisfaction. PIL had a direct large effect on life satisfaction (β = .54). The influence of GSE on life satisfaction was mediated by loss appraisals. Avoidance, active and humor coping had small effects on life satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Psychological resources have a substantial effect on life satisfaction in persons with SCI. Our results correspond with the SCIAM and its conceptualization of adjustment as a multifactorial process, but did not fully support the hypothesized mediation. PIL was strongly related to higher life satisfaction and may be a suitable intervention target to support persons with SCI.

References

  1. Psychol Med. 1998 May;28(3):551-8 [PMID: 9626712]
  2. J Clin Psychol. 1964 Apr;20:200-7 [PMID: 14138376]
  3. Spinal Cord. 2010 Oct;48(10):762-9 [PMID: 20212500]
  4. Women Health. 2010 Oct;50(7):688-704 [PMID: 21104570]
  5. Spinal Cord. 2009 Nov;47(11):778-82 [PMID: 19506568]
  6. Spinal Cord. 2001 Dec;39(12):615-27 [PMID: 11781857]
  7. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Apr;79(4):395-401 [PMID: 9552104]
  8. Spinal Cord. 1999 Oct;37(10):671-9 [PMID: 10557122]
  9. Psychooncology. 1997 Jun;6(2):129-37 [PMID: 9205970]
  10. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31(3):290-6 [PMID: 18795479]
  11. J Spinal Cord Med. 2004;27(2):106-10 [PMID: 15162879]
  12. Spinal Cord. 1997 Dec;35(12):829-40 [PMID: 9429262]
  13. Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92-100 [PMID: 16250744]
  14. Rehabil Psychol. 2009 Aug;54(3):306-14 [PMID: 19702429]
  15. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Feb;92(2):207-13 [PMID: 21272716]
  16. Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Sep;15(Pt 3):611-21 [PMID: 19917152]
  17. Paraplegia. 1994 Jun;32(6):416-22 [PMID: 8090550]
  18. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Sep 03;8:94 [PMID: 20815864]
  19. Clin J Pain. 2010 Mar-Apr;26(3):206-16 [PMID: 20173434]
  20. NeuroRehabilitation. 2000;15(2):121-131 [PMID: 11455089]
  21. J Health Psychol. 2010 Mar;15(2):215-29 [PMID: 20207665]
  22. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1998 Mar;30(1):23-30 [PMID: 9526751]
  23. Multivariate Behav Res. 2005 Apr 1;40(2):235-59 [PMID: 26760108]
  24. Br J Clin Psychol. 2003 Mar;42(Pt 1):41-52 [PMID: 12675978]
  25. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Nov;90(11 Suppl 2):S5-16 [PMID: 21975676]
  26. Spinal Cord. 2010 Jan;48(1):73-9 [PMID: 19636329]
  27. Psychol Health Med. 2006 Feb;11(1):91-9 [PMID: 17129898]
  28. Br J Clin Psychol. 1995 Nov;34(4):627-39 [PMID: 8563669]
  29. Spinal Cord. 2012 Mar;50(3):174-87 [PMID: 22042298]
  30. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(19):1473-9 [PMID: 19230118]
  31. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Sep;95(9):1662-71 [PMID: 24792142]
  32. Spinal Cord. 2012 Mar;50(3):188-201 [PMID: 22124343]
  33. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jan;93(1):82-9 [PMID: 21978936]
  34. Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9 [PMID: 19565683]
  35. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Mar;61(6):584-95 [PMID: 18302600]

MeSH Term

Adaptation, Psychological
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Personal Satisfaction
Quality of Life
Self Efficacy
Spinal Cord Injuries
Surveys and Questionnaires
Switzerland

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0lifesatisfaction=modelresourcesPILpsychologicalGSEappraisalscoping2spinalcordSCIAMpersonsSCIstudy1examineeffectsmediatedinjuryadjustmentconductedaimrrelatedfit%effectsupportPURPOSE:aimsassociationsgeneralself-efficacypurposewhetherproposedMETHODS:Cross-sectionalmulticenterlivingcommunitySwitzerlandN516Pearson'scorrelationscalculatedstructuralequationmodelingaddressRESULTS:4858positivelyinitialcorrespondingyieldedpoorfinalgood660df21p<01RMSEA06590confidenceinterval048-082CFI97]explaining57variancedirectlargeβ54influencelossAvoidanceactivehumorsmallCONCLUSIONS:PsychologicalsubstantialresultscorrespondconceptualizationmultifactorialprocessfullyhypothesizedmediationstronglyhighermaysuitableinterventiontargetModelinginjury:role

Similar Articles

Cited By