Time-based loss in visual short-term memory is from trace decay, not temporal distinctiveness.

Timothy J Ricker, Lauren R Spiegel, Nelson Cowan
Author Information
  1. Timothy J Ricker: Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.
  2. Lauren R Spiegel: Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.
  3. Nelson Cowan: Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.

Abstract

There is no consensus as to why forgetting occurs in short-term memory tasks. In past work, we have shown that forgetting occurs with the passage of time, but there are 2 classes of theories that can explain this effect. In the present work, we investigate the reason for time-based forgetting by contrasting the predictions of temporal distinctiveness and trace decay in the procedure in which we have observed such loss, involving memory for arrays of characters or letters across several seconds. The 1st theory, temporal distinctiveness, predicts that increasing the amount of time between trials will lead to less proactive interference, resulting in less forgetting across a retention interval. In the 2nd theory, trace decay, temporal distinctiveness between trials is irrelevant to the loss over a retention interval. Using visual array change detection tasks in 4 experiments, we find small proactive interference effects on performance under some specific conditions, but no concomitant change in the effect of a retention interval. We conclude that trace decay is the more suitable class of explanations of the time-based forgetting in short-term memory that we have observed, and we suggest the need for further clarity in what the exact basis of that decay may be.

References

  1. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Jan;39(1):277-89 [PMID: 22612165]
  2. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Mar;133(1):83-100 [PMID: 14979753]
  3. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):338-53 [PMID: 21171805]
  4. J Exp Psychol. 1959 Sep;58:193-8 [PMID: 14432252]
  5. Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Feb;24(1):87-114; discussion 114-85 [PMID: 11515286]
  6. Psychol Sci. 2009 Apr;20(4):423-8 [PMID: 19320861]
  7. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Nov;136(4):663-84 [PMID: 17999578]
  8. Memory. 2002 Sep-Nov;10(5-6):305-18 [PMID: 12396643]
  9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 22;105(16):5975-9 [PMID: 18420818]
  10. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 May;33(3):570-85 [PMID: 17470006]
  11. Psychol Rev. 2011 Apr;118(2):175-92 [PMID: 21480738]
  12. Mem Cognit. 1988 Sep;16(5):480-7 [PMID: 3173097]
  13. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Oct;11(5):771-90 [PMID: 15732687]
  14. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Mar;40(2):417-28 [PMID: 24059859]
  15. Psychol Sci. 2004 Feb;15(2):106-11 [PMID: 14738517]
  16. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1986 Jan;12(1):3-15 [PMID: 2949048]
  17. Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Feb;19(1):87-92 [PMID: 22184034]
  18. Psychol Bull. 1988 Sep;104(2):163-91 [PMID: 3054993]
  19. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Mar;13(3):120-6 [PMID: 19223224]
  20. Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Aug;17(4):516-21 [PMID: 20702871]
  21. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007 Apr;16(2):80-84 [PMID: 22468032]
  22. Psychol Rev. 2007 Jul;114(3):539-76 [PMID: 17638496]
  23. J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 Jan 1;13(1):59-71 [PMID: 11224909]
  24. Psychol Sci. 2012;23(11):1435-7 [PMID: 23012268]
  25. Psychol Rev. 2012 Apr;119(2):223-71 [PMID: 22506678]
  26. Psychol Rev. 2005 Jan;112(1):3-42 [PMID: 15631586]
  27. Psychol Rev. 2008 Jul;115(3):544-76 [PMID: 18729591]
  28. PLoS One. 2008 Feb 27;3(2):e1699 [PMID: 18301775]
  29. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Nov;36(6):1355-68 [PMID: 20804281]
  30. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov;34(6):1561-4 [PMID: 18980415]
  31. Mem Cognit. 2008 Jul;36(5):957-67 [PMID: 18630202]
  32. Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):622-8 [PMID: 17614871]
  33. Cogn Psychol. 1998 Jul;36(2):138-202 [PMID: 9721199]
  34. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):225-37 [PMID: 19293088]
  35. Psychol Sci. 2008 Nov;19(11):1078-81 [PMID: 19076476]
  36. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Jul;38(4):1057-68 [PMID: 22449135]
  37. Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):779-804 [PMID: 18087943]
  38. Front Psychol. 2012 Feb 14;3:35 [PMID: 22347871]

Grants

  1. F31 MH094050/NIMH NIH HHS
  2. R01 HD021338/NICHD NIH HHS
  3. 2R01HD021338/NICHD NIH HHS
  4. 1F31MH094050/NIMH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Female
Humans
Male
Memory, Short-Term
Photic Stimulation
Psychological Tests
Time
Visual Perception
Young Adult