Senior physiotherapy students as standardised patients for junior students enhances self-efficacy and satisfaction in both junior and senior students.

Allison M Mandrusiak, Rosemary Isles, Angela T Chang, Nancy L Low Choy, Rowena Toppenberg, Donna McCook, Michelle D Smith, Karina O'Leary, Sandra G Brauer
Author Information
  1. Allison M Mandrusiak: Division of Physiotherapy, School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia. a.mandrusiak@uq.edu.au.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Standardised patients are used in medical education to expose students to clinical contexts and facilitate transition to clinical practice, and this approach is gaining momentum in physiotherapy programs. Expense and availability of trained standardised patients are factors limiting widespread adoption, and accessing clinical visits with real patients can be challenging. This study addressed these issues by engaging senior students as standardised patients for junior students. It evaluated how this approach impacted self-reported constructs of both the junior and senior students.
METHODS: Learning activities for undergraduate physiotherapy students were developed in five courses (Neurology, Cardiorespiratory and three Musculoskeletal courses) so that junior students (Year 2 and 3) could develop skills and confidence in patient interview, physical examination and patient management through their interaction with standardised patients played by senior students (Year 4). Surveys were administered before and after the interactions to record junior students' self-reported confidence, communication, preparedness for clinic, and insight into their abilities; and senior students' confidence and insight into what it is like to be a patient. Satisfaction regarding this learning approach was surveyed in both the junior and senior students.
RESULTS: A total of 253 students completed the surveys (mean 92.5% response rate). Across all courses, junior students reported a significant (all P < 0.037) improvement following the standardised patient interaction in their: preparedness for clinic, communication with clients, confidence with practical skills, and understanding of their strengths and weaknesses in relation to the learning activities. Senior students demonstrated a significant improvement in their confidence in providing feedback and insight into their own learning (P < 0.001). All students reported high satisfaction with this learning experience (mean score 8.5/10).
CONCLUSION: This new approach to peer-assisted learning using senior students as standardised patients resulted in positive experiences for both junior and senior students across a variety of physiotherapy areas, activities, and stages within a physiotherapy program. These findings support the engagement of senior students as standardised patients to enhance learning within physiotherapy programs, and may have application across other disciplines to address challenges associated with accessing real patients via clinical visits or utilising actors as standardised patients.

References

  1. BMC Med Educ. 2007 Jun 28;7:20 [PMID: 17598885]
  2. Med Teach. 2009 Jun;31(6):487-92 [PMID: 19811163]
  3. J Allied Health. 1997 Fall;26(4):177-86 [PMID: 9451588]
  4. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006 Jun 15;70(3):70 [PMID: 17136190]
  5. BMC Med Educ. 2012 Nov 13;12:112 [PMID: 23145840]
  6. Med Educ. 2005 Jul;39(7):704-12 [PMID: 15960791]
  7. Pharm World Sci. 2001 Dec;23(6):212-6 [PMID: 11826510]
  8. Clin Excell Nurse Pract. 1999 Jul;3(4):230-7 [PMID: 10711063]
  9. Med Educ. 2006 Aug;40(8):775-80 [PMID: 16869923]
  10. Phys Ther. 2010 Jan;90(1):75-88 [PMID: 19926680]
  11. Med Teach. 2007 Sep;29(6):591-9 [PMID: 17922354]
  12. BMC Med Educ. 2011 Mar 17;11:11 [PMID: 21414226]
  13. Acad Med. 1998 Feb;73(2):198-200 [PMID: 9484194]
  14. Acad Med. 1993 Jun;68(6):443-51; discussion 451-3 [PMID: 8507309]
  15. Med Educ. 1990 Jul;24(4):336-43 [PMID: 2395425]
  16. Physiotherapy. 2009 Dec;95(4):294-301 [PMID: 19892094]
  17. BMC Med Educ. 2009 Aug 25;9:55 [PMID: 19706190]
  18. J Nurs Educ. 2006 Apr;45(4):103-11 [PMID: 16629278]
  19. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Feb;78(2):143-8 [PMID: 19683890]
  20. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Feb 19;73(1):4 [PMID: 19513141]
  21. Acad Med. 1997 Aug;72(8):725-7 [PMID: 9282151]
  22. Med Educ. 2008 Sep;42(9):901-8 [PMID: 18694405]
  23. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2001 Jul-Aug;22(5):517-31 [PMID: 11881513]
  24. Teach Learn Med. 2006 Spring;18(2):130-6 [PMID: 16626271]

MeSH Term

Clinical Competence
Educational Measurement
Female
Humans
Male
Patient Simulation
Physical Therapy Modalities
Self Efficacy
Students, Medical
Teaching
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0studentspatientsseniorjuniorstandardisedphysiotherapylearningconfidenceclinicalapproachpatientactivitiescoursesinsightprogramsaccessingvisitsrealself-reportedYearskillsinteractionstudents'communicationpreparednessclinicmeanreportedsignificantP < 0improvementSeniorsatisfactionacrosswithinBACKGROUND:StandardisedusedmedicaleducationexposecontextsfacilitatetransitionpracticegainingmomentumExpenseavailabilitytrainedfactorslimitingwidespreadadoptioncanchallengingstudyaddressedissuesengagingevaluatedimpactedconstructsMETHODS:LearningundergraduatedevelopedfiveNeurologyCardiorespiratorythreeMusculoskeletal23developinterviewphysicalexaminationmanagementplayed4SurveysadministeredinteractionsrecordabilitieslikeSatisfactionregardingsurveyedRESULTS:total253completedsurveys925%responserateAcross037followingtheir:clientspracticalunderstandingstrengthsweaknessesrelationdemonstratedprovidingfeedback001highexperiencescore85/10CONCLUSION:newpeer-assistedusingresultedpositiveexperiencesvarietyareasstagesprogramfindingssupportengagementenhancemayapplicationdisciplinesaddresschallengesassociatedviautilisingactorsenhancesself-efficacy

Similar Articles

Cited By