Association of purine asymmetry, strand-biased gene distribution and PolC within Firmicutes and beyond: a new appraisal.

Sanjoy Kumar Saha, Aranyak Goswami, Chitra Dutta
Author Information
  1. Chitra Dutta: Structural Biology & Bioinformatics Division, CSIR- Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, 4, Raja S, C, Mullick Road, Kolkata 700032, India. cdutta@iicb.res.in.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Firmicutes often possess three conspicuous genome features: marked Purine Asymmetry (PAS) across two strands of replication, Strand-biased Gene Distribution (SGD) and presence of two isoforms of DNA polymerase III alpha subunit, PolC and DnaE. Despite considerable research efforts, it is not clear whether the co-existence of PAS, PolC and/or SGD is an essential and exclusive characteristic of the Firmicutes. The nature of correlations, if any, between these three features within and beyond the lineages of Firmicutes has also remained elusive. The present study has been designed to address these issues.
RESULTS: A large-scale analysis of diverse bacterial genomes indicates that PAS, PolC and SGD are neither essential nor exclusive features of the Firmicutes. PolC prevails in four bacterial phyla: Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, Tenericutes and Thermotogae, while PAS occurs only in subsets of Firmicutes, Fusobacteria and Tenericutes. There are five major compositional trends in Firmicutes: (I) an explicit PAS or G + A-dominance along the entire leading strand (II) only G-dominance in the leading strand, (III) alternate stretches of purine-rich and pyrimidine-rich sequences, (IV) G + T dominance along the leading strand, and (V) no identifiable patterns in base usage. Presence of strong SGD has been observed not only in genomes having PAS, but also in genomes with G-dominance along their leading strands - an observation that defies the notion of co-occurrence of PAS and SGD in Firmicutes. The PolC-containing non-Firmicutes organisms often have alternate stretches of R-dominant and Y-dominant sequences along their genomes and most of them show relatively weak, but significant SGD. Firmicutes having G + A-dominance or G-dominance along LeS usually show distinct base usage patterns in three codon sites of genes. Probable molecular mechanisms that might have incurred such usage patterns have been proposed.
CONCLUSION: Co-occurrence of PAS, strong SGD and PolC should not be regarded as a genome signature of the Firmicutes. Presence of PAS in a species may warrant PolC and strong SGD, but PolC and/or SGD not necessarily implies PAS.

References

  1. J Clin Microbiol. 2010 May;48(5):1619-23 [PMID: 20200297]
  2. Nature. 2002 May 16;417(6886):244 [PMID: 12015592]
  3. BMC Genomics. 2012 Feb 14;13:69 [PMID: 22333191]
  4. Trends Genet. 2000 Sep;16(9):376-8 [PMID: 10973064]
  5. J Mol Evol. 1998 Dec;47(6):691-6 [PMID: 9847411]
  6. J Mol Biol. 1987 Apr 20;194(4):643-52 [PMID: 2443708]
  7. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998 May 15;26(10):2286-90 [PMID: 9580676]
  8. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 May;13(5):660-5 [PMID: 8676740]
  9. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004 May;54(Pt 3):871-875 [PMID: 15143038]
  10. Nat Genet. 2003 Aug;34(4):377-8 [PMID: 12847524]
  11. Brief Bioinform. 2008 Sep;9(5):376-91 [PMID: 18660512]
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Sep 1;95(18):10698-703 [PMID: 9724767]
  13. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D90-3 [PMID: 23093601]
  14. BMC Genomics. 2009 Dec 30;10:640 [PMID: 20042086]
  15. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jan 1;33(Database issue):D317-20 [PMID: 15608206]
  16. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jan;35(Database issue):D61-5 [PMID: 17130148]
  17. Trends Microbiol. 2002 Sep;10(9):393-5 [PMID: 12217498]
  18. Trends Microbiol. 2011 Feb;19(2):85-94 [PMID: 21112786]
  19. Genome Res. 2000 Feb;10(2):228-36 [PMID: 10673280]
  20. Res Microbiol. 2010 Dec;161(10):838-46 [PMID: 20868744]
  21. J Mol Evol. 2006 May;62(5):645-58 [PMID: 16557339]
  22. BMC Evol Biol. 2004 Nov 26;4:50 [PMID: 15566569]
  23. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Sep 1;40(17):8210-8 [PMID: 22735706]
  24. Genome Res. 2002 May;12(5):689-700 [PMID: 11997336]
  25. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007 Apr 27;356(1):20-5 [PMID: 17336933]
  26. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jul 16;32(13):3781-91 [PMID: 15258248]
  27. Biochemistry. 2002 Sep 24;41(38):11325-30 [PMID: 12234173]
  28. BMC Genomics. 2009 Jul 31;10:346 [PMID: 19646265]
  29. PLoS Genet. 2011 Sep;7(9):e1002283 [PMID: 21935355]
  30. DNA Res. 2003 Jun 30;10(3):85-95 [PMID: 12886951]
  31. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2012 Aug;10(4):186-96 [PMID: 23084774]
  32. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Nov 15;31(22):6570-7 [PMID: 14602916]
  33. Trends Microbiol. 2007 Apr;15(4):172-80 [PMID: 17336071]
  34. Genome Biol. 2002 Sep 26;3(10):RESEARCH0058 [PMID: 12372146]
  35. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2008 Jun;25(6):647-53 [PMID: 18399698]
  36. Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Oct;24(10):2169-79 [PMID: 17646257]
  37. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 May 15;28(10):2084-90 [PMID: 10773076]
  38. Science. 2001 Nov 23;294(5547):1716-9 [PMID: 11721055]
  39. Archaea. 2005 May;1(5):335-46 [PMID: 15876567]
  40. Trends Genet. 1997 Jun;13(6):240-5 [PMID: 9196330]
  41. Genomics. 2007 Aug;90(2):186-94 [PMID: 17532183]
  42. Nature. 2013 Mar 28;495(7442):512-5 [PMID: 23538833]
  43. DNA Res. 2005;12(2):91-102 [PMID: 16303741]
  44. Nat Genet. 2001 Jul;28(3):281-5 [PMID: 11431701]
  45. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Jan;3(1):21-9 [PMID: 11823795]
  46. Nature. 1999 May 27;399(6734):323-9 [PMID: 10360571]
  47. Gene. 1999 Sep 30;238(1):65-77 [PMID: 10570985]
  48. Genome Res. 2002 Jul;12(7):1080-90 [PMID: 12097345]
  49. Biochimie. 1996;78(5):323-6 [PMID: 8905151]
  50. BMC Genomics. 2003 May 5;4(1):17 [PMID: 12732098]

MeSH Term

Bacteria
Bacterial Proteins
DNA Polymerase III
DNA Replication
DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase
Genes, Bacterial
Genome, Bacterial
Purines

Chemicals

Bacterial Proteins
Purines
DNA polymerase III, alpha subunit
PolC protein, bacteria
DNA Polymerase III
DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase
purine

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0FirmicutesPASSGDPolCalonggenomesleadingthreestrandG-dominancepatternsusagestrongoftengenometwostrandsIIIand/oressentialexclusivefeatureswithinalsobacterialFusobacteriaTenericutesG + A-dominancealternatestretchessequencesbasePresenceshowBACKGROUND:possessconspicuousfeatures:markedPurineAsymmetryacrossreplicationStrand-biasedGeneDistributionpresenceisoformsDNApolymerasealphasubunitDnaEDespiteconsiderableresearcheffortsclearwhetherco-existencecharacteristicnaturecorrelationsbeyondlineagesremainedelusivepresentstudydesignedaddressissuesRESULTS:large-scaleanalysisdiverseindicatesneitherprevailsfourphyla:ThermotogaeoccurssubsetsfivemajorcompositionaltrendsFirmicutes:explicitentireIIpurine-richpyrimidine-richIVG + TdominanceVidentifiableobserved-observationdefiesnotionco-occurrencePolC-containingnon-FirmicutesorganismsR-dominantY-dominantrelativelyweaksignificantLeSusuallydistinctcodonsitesgenesProbablemolecularmechanismsmightincurredproposedCONCLUSION:Co-occurrenceregardedsignaturespeciesmaywarrantnecessarilyimpliesAssociationpurineasymmetrystrand-biasedgenedistributionbeyond:newappraisal

Similar Articles

Cited By