Assessment of mitral regurgitation severity by Doppler color flow mapping of the vena contracta in dogs.

M Di Marcello, E Terzo, C Locatelli, V Palermo, E Sala, E Dall'Aglio, C M Bussadori, I Spalla, P G Brambilla
Author Information
  1. M Di Marcello: Centro Medico Veterinario Cellatica, Cellatica, Brescia, Italy.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quantitative and semiquantitative methods have been proposed for the assessment of MR severity, and though all are associated with limitations. Measurement of vena contracta width (VCW) has been used in clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: To measure the VCW in dogs with different levels of MR severity.
ANIMALS: Two hundred and seventy-nine dogs were classified according to 5 levels of MR severity.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study. EROA and regurgitant volume calculated by the PISA method, were measured and indexed to BSA. Descriptive statistics were calculated for VCW and VCW index for all categories of MR severity. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (��s ) were calculated to compare the results of the different methods (VCW and VCW index vs RV PISA, RV PISA index, EROA, EROA index), and between VCW and VCW index versus MR severity.
RESULTS: All Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were significant (P < .001). The median values of VCW resulted of 2.9 mm (IQR 3.4-2.5) and of 4.6 mm (IQR 5.4-4.1) in the groups previously classified as mild-to-moderate and moderate-to-severe, respectively. The median values of VCW index resulted of 4.4 mm/m(2) (IQR = 5.5-4.2) in mild-to-moderate MR and of 10.8 mm/m(2) (IQR = 12.8-9.4) in moderate-to-severe MR.
CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: This is not a validation study against any previously validated invasive gold standard, the VCW method has proved easy to employ and it might be an additional tool in quantifying disease severity that supports, rather than replace, data coming from other techniques in daily clinical practice and research.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Cardiol. 2011 Feb 1;107(3):452-8 [PMID: 21257014]
  2. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Nov;2(11):1245-52 [PMID: 19909927]
  3. Am J Vet Res. 1988 Aug;49(8):1290-4 [PMID: 3178024]
  4. J Vet Sci. 2004 Jun;5(2):163-71 [PMID: 15192345]
  5. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008 Aug;21(8):912-21 [PMID: 18385013]
  6. Pediatr Cardiol. 2012 Feb;33(2):205-14 [PMID: 21909774]
  7. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2011 Jul;23(3):163-70 [PMID: 24146534]
  8. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Aug;32(2):427-31 [PMID: 9708471]
  9. Postgrad Med J. 2008 Aug;84(994):395-402 [PMID: 18832399]
  10. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003 Jul;16(7):777-802 [PMID: 12835667]
  11. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Jan;31(1):174-9 [PMID: 9426037]
  12. Heart. 2002 Nov;88 Suppl 4:iv11-9 [PMID: 12369587]
  13. J Vet Intern Med. 2003 Jan-Feb;17(1):84-8 [PMID: 12564731]
  14. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Sep;24(9):1013-9 [PMID: 21820277]
  15. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Mar;3(3):235-43 [PMID: 20223419]
  16. Circulation. 1997 Feb 4;95(3):636-42 [PMID: 9024151]
  17. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jul;5(7):669-76 [PMID: 22789934]
  18. Echocardiography. 2005 Oct;22(9):748-69 [PMID: 16194170]
  19. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Jun;33(7):2016-22 [PMID: 10362208]
  20. J Vet Cardiol. 2012 Mar;14(1):127-48 [PMID: 22366573]
  21. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010 May;11(4):307-32 [PMID: 20435783]
  22. Am J Cardiol. 2002 Sep 15;90(6):607-12 [PMID: 12231085]
  23. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Nov 1;30(5):1393-8 [PMID: 9350945]
  24. J Vet Cardiol. 2011 Dec;13(4):267-70 [PMID: 22036803]
  25. Circulation. 1997 Nov 18;96(10):3409-15 [PMID: 9396435]
  26. Circulation. 1978 Dec;58(6):1072-83 [PMID: 709763]
  27. J Heart Valve Dis. 2004 Jul;13(4):608-14 [PMID: 15311867]
  28. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Aug;99(2):445-57 [PMID: 15557009]
  29. J Vet Cardiol. 2003 Nov;5(2):33-8 [PMID: 19081363]
  30. J Vet Intern Med. 1993 Jul-Aug;7(4):247-52 [PMID: 8246215]
  31. Am J Cardiol. 2011 May 15;107(10):1517-21 [PMID: 21377646]
  32. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2007 Apr;9(2):105-11 [PMID: 17430677]
  33. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Mar;3(3):244-6 [PMID: 20223420]
  34. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011 Sep-Oct;35(5):625-30 [PMID: 21926860]
  35. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003 Sep;16(9):1002-6 [PMID: 12931115]
  36. Am J Cardiol. 1994 Feb 1;73(4):268-74 [PMID: 8296758]
  37. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 Mar;1(2):221-37 [PMID: 19356431]
  38. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2010 Jul;40(4):651-63 [PMID: 20610017]
  39. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007 Aug 1;231(3):399-406 [PMID: 17669041]

MeSH Term

Animals
Dog Diseases
Dogs
Echocardiography, Doppler, Color
Hemodynamics
Laser-Doppler Flowmetry
Mitral Valve
Mitral Valve Insufficiency
Retrospective Studies
Severity of Illness Index

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0VCWMRseverityindex52IQR4contractadogsEROAcalculatedPISAmethodsvenawidthclinicalpracticedifferentlevelsclassifiedstudymethodSpearman'srankcorrelationcoefficientsRVmedianvaluesresultedmmpreviouslymild-to-moderatemoderate-to-severemm/m=diseasemitralBACKGROUND:QuantitativesemiquantitativeproposedassessmentthoughassociatedlimitationsMeasurementusedOBJECTIVE:measureANIMALS:Twohundredseventy-nineaccordingMETHODS:retrospectiveregurgitantvolumemeasuredindexedBSADescriptivestatisticscategories��scompareresultsvsversusRESULTS:significantP<001934-264-41groupsrespectively5-4108128-9CONCLUSIONANDCLINICALIMPORTANCE:validationvalidatedinvasivegoldstandardprovedeasyemploymightadditionaltoolquantifyingsupportsratherreplacedatacomingtechniquesdailyresearchAssessmentregurgitationDopplercolorflowmappingCongestiveheartfailureDegenerativevalveVena

Similar Articles

Cited By