Do outside temperature and sunlight duration influence the outcome of laser refractive surgery? Results from the Hamburg Weather Study.

Ines Neuhaus-Richard, Andreas Frings, Isabel Caroline Görsch, Vasyl Druchkiv, Toam Katz, Stephan Johannes Linke, Gisbert Richard
Author Information
  1. Ines Neuhaus-Richard: Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
  2. Andreas Frings: Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
  3. Isabel Caroline Görsch: Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
  4. Vasyl Druchkiv: Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
  5. Toam Katz: Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany ; Care Vision Refractive Centers, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  6. Stephan Johannes Linke: Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany ; Care Vision Refractive Centers, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  7. Gisbert Richard: Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the impact of temperature and sunlight duration on refractive and visual outcome of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in myopic eyes.
SETTING: University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany, and Care Vision Refractive Centers, Germany.
DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional data analysis.
METHODS: This study comprised 1,052 eyes of 1,052 consecutive myopic patients (419 males, 633 females; mean age at surgery 35.0±9.0 years) with a mean preoperative refractive spherical equivalent (SE) of -3.88±1.85 diopters (D). Two subgroups were defined, comprising patients undergoing surgery during either meteorological winter or summer. Manifest refraction, uncorrected, and corrected distant visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA) were assessed pre- and postoperatively. We applied robust regression analysis with efficiency index (EI), safety index (SI), and postoperative SE (in D) as dependent variables.
RESULTS: At the 1-month (33.0±5.0 days) follow-up, the mean postoperative SE was -0.18±0.44 D. Bivariate comparisons showed that statistically significant better EI was related to days with lower temperature. We obtained a significant difference for SI which suggested that low temperature had a positive influence on SI. No change by more than one line on LogMAR scale was obtained.
CONCLUSION: Although being statistically significant, there was no clinically relevant difference in the outcome of LASIK, which demonstrates its highly standardized quality. Prospective, longitudinal studies are warranted to address meteorotropic reactions through evaluating defined meteorological parameters.

Keywords

References

  1. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1995;93:163-83; discussion 184-90 [PMID: 8719677]
  2. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 20;346(25):1978-88 [PMID: 12075060]
  3. Environ Res. 1975 Aug;10(1):1-13 [PMID: 1175573]
  4. Experientia. 1993 Sep 15;49(9):759-68 [PMID: 8405298]
  5. Acta Physiol Scand. 1956 Jul 17;37(1):35-9 [PMID: 13339450]
  6. Environ Res. 2005 Jul;98(3):390-9 [PMID: 15910795]
  7. BMC Neurol. 2001 Dec 18;1:7 [PMID: 11737872]
  8. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Mar;10(3):403-6 [PMID: 20008897]
  9. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Mar;39(3):366-77 [PMID: 23506918]
  10. N Engl J Med. 1996 Jul 11;335(2):84-90 [PMID: 8649494]
  11. Headache. 1994 Apr;34(4):214-6 [PMID: 8014037]
  12. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Feb 1;137(3):331-41 [PMID: 8452141]
  13. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jan;37(1):1-3 [PMID: 21183094]
  14. Am J Hypertens. 1989 Sep;2(9):724-6 [PMID: 2529881]
  15. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2011 Apr;15(2):88-95 [PMID: 21814372]
  16. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2002 Aug;13(4):250-5 [PMID: 12165710]
  17. Environ Health. 2009 Sep 16;8:40 [PMID: 19758453]
  18. Environ Res. 1978 Jun;15(3):504-12 [PMID: 679906]
  19. Eye Contact Lens. 2011 Jul;37(4):214-24 [PMID: 21670690]
  20. Environ Res. 1972 Mar;5(1):1-58 [PMID: 4555874]
  21. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Oct;11(5):483-91 [PMID: 21822133]
  22. Biol Bull. 1950 Oct;99(2):259-71 [PMID: 14791423]
  23. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Aug;29(8):1507-13 [PMID: 12954297]
  24. Am J Prev Med. 1999 Jul;17(1):97 [PMID: 10429760]
  25. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Apr;30(4):775-85 [PMID: 15093638]
  26. Ophthalmology. 2013 Nov;120(11):2204-8 [PMID: 23769199]
  27. Environ Res. 1995 Aug;70(2):105-13 [PMID: 8674478]
  28. Am J Prev Med. 1999 May;16(4):269-77 [PMID: 10493281]
  29. Environ Health Perspect. 2001 May;109 Suppl 2:185-9 [PMID: 11359685]
  30. Neth Heart J. 2012 May;20(5):193-6 [PMID: 22328355]
  31. J Refract Surg. 2003 Nov-Dec;19(6):636-44 [PMID: 14640428]
  32. Eye Contact Lens. 2011 Jul;37(4):225-32 [PMID: 21646979]
  33. Int J Biometeorol. 1999 Nov;43(3):124-7 [PMID: 10639904]
  34. Eye (Lond). 2004 Dec;18(12):1235-50 [PMID: 15044935]
  35. J Refract Surg. 1996 Mar-Apr;12(3):417-21 [PMID: 8705718]
  36. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Apr;30(4):798-803 [PMID: 15093641]
  37. J Refract Surg. 2005 Nov-Dec;21(6):742-8 [PMID: 16329367]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0temperaturerefractivesunlightoutcomeLASIKmeansurgerySEDSIsignificantdurationvisualmyopiceyesGermanyanalysis1052patients0definedmeteorologicalindexEIpostoperativedaysstatisticallyobtaineddifferenceinfluencePURPOSE:examineimpactlaser-assistedsitukeratomileusisSETTING:UniversityMedicalCenterHamburg-EppendorfCareVisionRefractiveCentersDESIGN:Retrospectivecross-sectionaldataMETHODS:studycomprisedconsecutive419males633femalesage350±9yearspreoperativesphericalequivalent-388±185dioptersTwosubgroupscomprisingundergoingeitherwintersummerManifestrefractionuncorrectedcorrecteddistantacuityUDVACDVAassessedpre-postoperativelyappliedrobustregressionefficiencysafetydependentvariablesRESULTS:1-month330±5follow-up-018±044BivariatecomparisonsshowedbetterrelatedlowersuggestedlowpositivechangeonelineLogMARscaleCONCLUSION:AlthoughclinicallyrelevantdemonstrateshighlystandardizedqualityProspectivelongitudinalstudieswarrantedaddressmeteorotropicreactionsevaluatingparametersoutsidelasersurgery?ResultsHamburgWeatherStudyweather

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)