Predicting co-author relationship in medical co-authorship networks.

Qi Yu, Chao Long, Yanhua Lv, Hongfang Shao, Peifeng He, Zhiguang Duan
Author Information
  1. Qi Yu: Department of Medical Information Management, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China; School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
  2. Chao Long: School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
  3. Yanhua Lv: Department of Medical Information Management, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
  4. Hongfang Shao: Department of Science and Technology, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
  5. Peifeng He: Department of Medical Information Management, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
  6. Zhiguang Duan: School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.

Abstract

Research collaborations are encouraged because a synergistic effect yielding good results often appears. However, creating and organizing a strong research group is a difficult task. One of the greatest concerns of an individual researcher is locating potential collaborators whose expertise complement his best. In this paper, we propose a method that makes link predictions in co-authorship networks, where topological features between authors such as Adamic/Adar, Common Neighbors, Jaccard's Coefficient, Preferential Attachment, Katzβ, and PropFlow may be good indicators of their future collaborations. Firstly, these topological features were systematically extracted from the network. Then, supervised models were used to learn the best weights associated with different topological features in deciding co-author relationships. Finally, we tested our models on the co-authorship networks in the research field of Coronary Artery Disease and obtained encouraging accuracy (the precision, recall, F1 score and AUC were, respectively, 0.696, 0.677, 0.671 and 0.742 for Logistic Regression, and respectively, 0.697, 0.678, 0.671 and 0.743 for SVM). This suggests that our models could be used to build and manage strong research groups.

References

  1. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 24;8(7):e70299 [PMID: 23894639]
  2. Bioinformatics. 2013 Feb 1;29(3):355-64 [PMID: 23235927]
  3. Nature. 2008 May 1;453(7191):98-101 [PMID: 18451861]
  4. Science. 1999 Oct 15;286(5439):509-12 [PMID: 10521342]
  5. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009 Oct;80(4 Pt 2):046122 [PMID: 19905405]
  6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 16;98(2):404-9 [PMID: 11149952]
  7. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2012 Nov;23(11):1793-804 [PMID: 24808073]

MeSH Term

Authorship
Bibliometrics
Cooperative Behavior
Humans
Models, Theoretical
Publishing

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00researchco-authorshipnetworkstopologicalfeaturesmodelscollaborationsgoodstrongbestusedco-authorrespectively671ResearchencouragedsynergisticeffectyieldingresultsoftenappearsHowevercreatingorganizinggroupdifficulttaskOnegreatestconcernsindividualresearcherlocatingpotentialcollaboratorswhoseexpertisecomplementpaperproposemethodmakeslinkpredictionsauthorsAdamic/AdarCommonNeighborsJaccard'sCoefficientPreferentialAttachmentKatzβPropFlowmayindicatorsfutureFirstlysystematicallyextractednetworksupervisedlearnweightsassociateddifferentdecidingrelationshipsFinallytestedfieldCoronaryArteryDiseaseobtainedencouragingaccuracyprecisionrecallF1scoreAUC696677742LogisticRegression697678743SVMsuggestsbuildmanagegroupsPredictingrelationshipmedical

Similar Articles

Cited By