Optimizing ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing for superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome: electrode placement.

M Geraldine Zuniga, Marcela Davalos-Bichara, Michael C Schubert, John P Carey, Kristen L Janky
Author Information
  1. M Geraldine Zuniga: Department of Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn., USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs) using 2 electrode montages for the diagnosis of superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS).
SUBJECTS: 16 SCDS patients (17 affected-SCDS ears, 15 contralateral-SCDS ears) and 12 controls (24 ears).
METHODS: oVEMPs were recorded in response to 500-Hz tone bursts using 2 electrode montages. For both montages the active electrode was placed approximately 5 mm below each eye and a ground electrode on the sternum. For montage 1 (standard), the reference electrode was centered 2 cm below each active electrode. For montage 2, the reference electrode was placed on the chin.
RESULTS: For either montage, the separation between oVEMP amplitudes in affected-SCDS ears and controls was significant (p < 0.001), with excellent sensitivity and specificity (>90%).
CONCLUSION: oVEMP recordings with the standard montage remain a reliable method for evaluation of SCDS.

References

  1. Otol Neurotol. 2007 Feb;28(2):250-7 [PMID: 17255894]
  2. Otol Neurotol. 2013 Jan;34(1):127-34 [PMID: 23151775]
  3. Acta Otolaryngol. 2003 May;123(4):477-81 [PMID: 12797581]
  4. Acta Otolaryngol. 1999;119(6):633-40 [PMID: 10586994]
  5. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 Mar;124(3):249-58 [PMID: 9525507]
  6. Radiology. 2003 Feb;226(2):337-43 [PMID: 12563123]
  7. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Aug;143(2):274-80 [PMID: 20647134]
  8. Otol Neurotol. 2004 May;25(3):323-32 [PMID: 15129113]
  9. Neurology. 2008 Feb 5;70(6):464-72 [PMID: 18250291]
  10. J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Apr;22(4):222-30 [PMID: 21586257]
  11. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Feb;121(2):132-44 [PMID: 19897412]
  12. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Feb;123(2):216 [PMID: 21763192]
  13. Ear Hear. 2012 Jul-Aug;33(4):508-20 [PMID: 22441357]
  14. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Feb;57(2):190-7 [PMID: 8126503]
  15. Neurology. 2007 Apr 10;68(15):1227-9 [PMID: 17420408]
  16. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 May;144(5):751-2 [PMID: 21493346]
  17. Otol Neurotol. 2013 Jan;34(1):121-6 [PMID: 23183641]
  18. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Aug;143(2):281-3 [PMID: 20647135]
  19. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Sep;267(9):1487-9 [PMID: 20582703]
  20. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 May;79(5):559-68 [PMID: 17766428]
  21. Laryngoscope. 2010 Sep;120(9):1910-7 [PMID: 20717941]

Grants

  1. P30 DC004662/NIDCD NIH HHS
  2. P20 GM109023/NIGMS NIH HHS
  3. R01 DC005040/NIDCD NIH HHS
  4. T32 DC000023/NIDCD NIH HHS
  5. T32DC000023/NIDCD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Case-Control Studies
Electrodes
Female
Humans
Labyrinth Diseases
Male
Middle Aged
Semicircular Canals
Sensitivity and Specificity
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0electrode2earsmontagemontagesSCDSsensitivityspecificityocularvestibularevokedmyogenicoVEMPsusingsuperiorcanaldehiscenceaffected-SCDScontrolsactiveplacedstandardreferenceoVEMPOBJECTIVE:comparepotentialsdiagnosissyndromeSUBJECTS:16patients1715contralateral-SCDS1224METHODS:recordedresponse500-Hztoneburstsapproximately5mmeyegroundsternum1centeredcmchinRESULTS:eitherseparationamplitudessignificantp<0001excellent>90%CONCLUSION:recordingsremainreliablemethodevaluationOptimizingpotentialtestingsemicircularsyndrome:placement

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)