MRSA carriage among healthcare workers in non-outbreak settings in Europe and the United States: a systematic review.

Madeleine Dulon, Claudia Peters, Anja Schablon, Albert Nienhaus
Author Information
  1. Madeleine Dulon: Department of Occupational Health Research, Institution for Statutory Accident Insurance and Prevention in the Health and Welfare Services, Pappelallee 33/35/37, 22089 Hamburg, Germany. madeleine.dulon@bgw-online.de.

Abstract

ABSTARCT BACKGROUND: A recent review estimated prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in healthcare workers (HCWs) to be 4.6%. However, MRSA carriage in HCWs in non-outbreak settings is thought to be higher than in an outbreak situation, due to increased hygiene awareness in outbreaks, but valid data are missing. The goals of this paper are to summarise the prevalence of MRSA carriage amongst HCWs in non-outbreak situations and to identify occupational groups in healthcare services associated with a higher risk of MRSA colonisation.
METHODS: A systematic search for literature was conducted in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using seven criteria. Pooled prevalence rates were calculated. Pooled effect estimates were identified in a meta-analysis.
RESULTS: 31 studies were included in this review. The pooled MRSA colonisation rate was 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34%-2.50%). The rate increased to 4.4% (95% CI, 3.98%-4.88%) when one study from the Netherlands was excluded. The pooled MRSA rate was highest in nursing staff (6.9%). Nursing staff had an odds ratio of 1.72 (95% CI, 1.07-2.77) when compared with medical staff and an odds ratio of 2.58 (95%, 1.83-3.66) when compared with other healthcare staff. Seven studies were assessed as being of high quality. The pooled MRSA prevalence in high quality studies was 1.1% or 5.4% if the one large study from the Netherlands is not considered. The pooled prevalence in studies of moderate quality was 4.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: MRSA prevalence among HCWs in non-outbreak settings was no higher than carriage rates estimated for outbreaks. Our estimate is in the lower half of the range of the published MRSA rates in the endemic setting. Our findings demonstrate that nursing staff have an increased risk for MRSA colonisation. In order to confirm this finding, more studies are needed, including healthcare professionals with varying degrees of exposure to MRSA. In order to reduce misclassification bias, standardisation of HCWs screening is warranted.

References

  1. J Hosp Infect. 2010 Mar;74(3):292-4 [PMID: 20149482]
  2. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Dec;28(12):1404-7 [PMID: 17994523]
  3. Chronic Dis Can. 1998;19(4):170-6 [PMID: 10029513]
  4. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2010 Aug;8(8):607-13 [PMID: 20184668]
  5. J Hosp Infect. 2006 May;63 Suppl 1:S1-44 [PMID: 16581155]
  6. J Hosp Infect. 2003 Jun;54(2):124-9 [PMID: 12818586]
  7. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005 Feb;24(2):145-8 [PMID: 15660253]
  8. J Hosp Infect. 2011 Apr;77(4):285-9 [PMID: 21292349]
  9. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Jun;18(6):551-7 [PMID: 21851484]
  10. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Apr;57(4):620-6 [PMID: 19392953]
  11. Epidemiology. 2007 Nov;18(6):800-4 [PMID: 18049194]
  12. Ann Ig. 2008 Sep-Oct;20(5):503-8 [PMID: 19069256]
  13. BMC Infect Dis. 2011 May 20;11:138 [PMID: 21599908]
  14. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003 Jun;24(6):456-8 [PMID: 12828325]
  15. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2015 Jun;58(6):654 [PMID: 25939733]
  16. Euro Surveill. 2011 Mar 17;16(11): [PMID: 21435327]
  17. Int J Med Microbiol. 2013 Dec;303(8):405-9 [PMID: 23770266]
  18. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 [PMID: 19621072]
  19. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 Aug;28(8):991-5 [PMID: 19238468]
  20. Am J Med. 2008 Apr;121(4):310-5 [PMID: 18374690]
  21. Microb Drug Resist. 2009 Mar;15(1):19-26 [PMID: 19296773]
  22. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;30(10):977-84 [PMID: 19712031]
  23. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Jul;27(7):1471-6 [PMID: 2768437]
  24. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 Feb;28(2):115-27 [PMID: 18688664]
  25. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Jun;31(6):574-80 [PMID: 20426580]
  26. Am J Infect Control. 2008 Mar;36(2):93-7 [PMID: 18313510]
  27. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010 Jul;16(7):934-44 [PMID: 19686277]
  28. J Hosp Infect. 2008 Aug;69(4):315-20 [PMID: 18602183]
  29. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1993 Oct;14(10):576-8 [PMID: 8228149]
  30. Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;52(5):529-33 [PMID: 18439722]
  31. J Hosp Infect. 2009 Oct;73(2):182-4 [PMID: 19699010]
  32. BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34 [PMID: 9310563]
  33. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 Sep;30(9):1063-6 [PMID: 21311935]
  34. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005 Dec;5(12):751-62 [PMID: 16310147]
  35. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004 May;25(5):364-5 [PMID: 15188838]
  36. Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Jan 15;36(2):131-9 [PMID: 12522744]
  37. Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;52(5):525-8 [PMID: 18439725]
  38. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011 Mar;84(3):259-66 [PMID: 21212973]
  39. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003 May;24(5):362-86 [PMID: 12785411]
  40. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008 May;8(5):289-301 [PMID: 18471774]
  41. Med Mal Infect. 2012 Sep;42(9):435-9 [PMID: 22959772]
  42. J Infect Public Health. 2008;1(2):78-100 [PMID: 20701849]
  43. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008 Dec;27(12):1109-11 [PMID: 19068516]
  44. Kidney Int. 2005 Mar;67(3):1084-92 [PMID: 15698449]
  45. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Aug 4;92(9):1815-9 [PMID: 20610774]
  46. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 May;89(5):642-5 [PMID: 17540751]
  47. Ann Intern Med. 1996 Mar 15;124(6):539-47 [PMID: 8597316]
  48. Rev Esp Quimioter. 2012 Dec;25(4):252-5 [PMID: 23303255]
  49. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004 Feb;25(2):114-20 [PMID: 14994935]
  50. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;27(10):1123-7 [PMID: 17006821]
  51. J Hosp Infect. 2011 Nov;79(3):274-5 [PMID: 21741725]
  52. Am J Infect Control. 2004 Dec;32(8):470-85 [PMID: 15573054]

MeSH Term

Carrier State
Europe
Health Personnel
Humans
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Prevalence
Staphylococcal Infections
United States

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MRSAprevalencestudies1healthcareHCWsstaffcarriagenon-outbreakqualitypooled95%review4settingshigherincreasedcolonisationratesrateestimatedworkersoutbreaksrisksystematicassessedPooled4%CIonestudyNetherlandsnursingoddsratiocomparedhighamongorderABSTARCTBACKGROUND:recentmethicillin-resistantStaphylococcusaureus6%HoweverthoughtoutbreaksituationduehygieneawarenessvaliddatamissinggoalspapersummariseamongstsituationsidentifyoccupationalgroupsservicesassociatedMETHODS:searchliteratureconductedMEDLINEEMBASEdatabasesmethodologicalusingsevencriteriacalculatedeffectestimatesidentifiedmeta-analysisRESULTS:31included8%confidenceinterval[CI]34%-250%398%-488%excludedhighest69%Nursing7207-277medical25883-366Seven1%5largeconsideredmoderate0%CONCLUSIONS:estimatelowerhalfrangepublishedendemicsettingfindingsdemonstrateconfirmfindingneededincludingprofessionalsvaryingdegreesexposurereducemisclassificationbiasstandardisationscreeningwarrantedEuropeUnitedStates:

Similar Articles

Cited By (53)