Open source software in a practical approach for post processing of radiologic images.

Gianluca Valeri, Francesco Antonino Mazza, Stefania Maggi, Daniele Aramini, Luigi La Riccia, Giovanni Mazzoni, Andrea Giovagnoni
Author Information
  1. Gianluca Valeri: Clinical Radiology, AOU Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy, g-l-v@libero.it.

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the use of open source software (OSS) to process DICOM images.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We selected 23 programs for Windows and 20 programs for Mac from 150 possible OSS programs including DICOM viewers and various tools (converters, DICOM header editors, etc.). The programs selected all meet the basic requirements such as free availability, stand-alone application, presence of graphical user interface, ease of installation and advanced features beyond simple display monitor. Capabilities of data import, data export, metadata, 2D viewer, 3D viewer, support platform and usability of each selected program were evaluated on a scale ranging from 1 to 10 points.
RESULTS: Twelve programs received a score higher than or equal to eight. Among them, five obtained a score of 9: 3D Slicer, MedINRIA, MITK 3M3, VolView, VR Render; while OsiriX received 10.
CONCLUSIONS: OsiriX appears to be the only program able to perform all the operations taken into consideration, similar to a workstation equipped with proprietary software, allowing the analysis and interpretation of images in a simple and intuitive way. OsiriX is a DICOM PACS workstation for medical imaging and software for image processing for medical research, functional imaging, 3D imaging, confocal microscopy and molecular imaging. This application is also a good tool for teaching activities because it facilitates the attainment of learning objectives among students and other specialists.

References

  1. J Am Coll Radiol. 2012 Oct;9(10):751-2 [PMID: 23025872]
  2. Radiographics. 2003 Sep-Oct;23(5):1341-57 [PMID: 12975521]
  3. Radiographics. 2004 Nov-Dec;24(6):1763-77 [PMID: 15537984]
  4. World J Surg. 2010 Oct;34(10):2426-33 [PMID: 20652701]
  5. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jun;192(6):W330-4 [PMID: 19457798]
  6. Med Image Anal. 2005 Dec;9(6):594-604 [PMID: 15896995]
  7. J Digit Imaging. 2007 Nov;20 Suppl 1:1-10 [PMID: 17674101]
  8. Methods Inf Med. 2009;48(4):311-3 [PMID: 19662318]
  9. Clin Radiol. 2007 Feb;62(2):120-30 [PMID: 17207693]
  10. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Nov;30(9):1323-41 [PMID: 22770690]
  11. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;150:963-7 [PMID: 19745456]
  12. World J Surg. 2011 Feb;35(2):386-92 [PMID: 21136056]
  13. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2010 Nov;5(6):555-6 [PMID: 21153507]
  14. J Digit Imaging. 2004 Sep;17(3):205-16 [PMID: 15534753]
  15. J Digit Imaging. 2007 Nov;20 Suppl 1:63-71 [PMID: 17701069]

MeSH Term

Diagnostic Imaging
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Radiology Information Systems
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Software
Software Validation
User-Computer Interface

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0programssoftwareDICOMimagingimagesselected3DOsiriXsourceOSSapplicationsimpledataviewerprogram10receivedscoreworkstationmedicalprocessingPURPOSE:purposepaperevaluateuseopenprocessMATERIALSANDMETHODS:23Windows20Mac150possibleincludingviewersvarioustoolsconvertersheadereditorsetcmeetbasicrequirementsfreeavailabilitystand-alonepresencegraphicaluserinterfaceeaseinstallationadvancedfeaturesbeyonddisplaymonitorCapabilitiesimportexportmetadata2Dsupportplatformusabilityevaluatedscaleranging1pointsRESULTS:TwelvehigherequaleightAmongfiveobtained9:SlicerMedINRIAMITK3M3VolViewVRRenderCONCLUSIONS:appearsableperformoperationstakenconsiderationsimilarequippedproprietaryallowinganalysisinterpretationintuitivewayPACSimageresearchfunctionalconfocalmicroscopymolecularalsogoodtoolteachingactivitiesfacilitatesattainmentlearningobjectivesamongstudentsspecialistsOpenpracticalapproachpostradiologic

Similar Articles

Cited By