Performance of lead-free versus lead-based hunting ammunition in ballistic soap.

Felix Gremse, Oliver Krone, Mirko Thamm, Fabian Kiessling, René Hany Tolba, Siegfried Rieger, Carl Gremse
Author Information
  1. Felix Gremse: Experimental Molecular Imaging, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
  2. Oliver Krone: Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
  3. Mirko Thamm: Experimental Molecular Imaging, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
  4. Fabian Kiessling: Experimental Molecular Imaging, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
  5. René Hany Tolba: Laboratory Animal Science, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
  6. Siegfried Rieger: Wildlife Biology, Management and Hunting Practice, HNE Eberswalde, Eberswalde, Germany.
  7. Carl Gremse: Wildlife Biology, Management and Hunting Practice, HNE Eberswalde, Eberswalde, Germany.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lead-free hunting bullets are an alternative to lead-containing bullets which cause health risks for humans and endangered scavenging raptors through lead ingestion. However, doubts concerning the effectiveness of lead-free hunting bullets hinder the wide-spread acceptance in the hunting and wildlife management community.
METHODS: We performed terminal ballistic experiments under standardized conditions with ballistic soap as surrogate for game animal tissue to characterize dimensionally stable, partially fragmenting, and deforming lead-free bullets and one commonly used lead-containing bullet. The permanent cavities created in soap blocks are used as a measure for the potential wound damage. The soap blocks were imaged using computed tomography to assess the volume and shape of the cavity and the number of fragments. Shots were performed at different impact speeds, covering a realistic shooting range. Using 3D image segmentation, cavity volume, metal fragment count, deflection angle, and depth of maximum damage were determined. Shots were repeated to investigate the reproducibility of ballistic soap experiments.
RESULTS: All bullets showed an increasing cavity volume with increasing deposited energy. The dimensionally stable and fragmenting lead-free bullets achieved a constant conversion ratio while the deforming copper and lead-containing bullets showed a ratio, which increases linearly with the total deposited energy. The lead-containing bullet created hundreds of fragments and significantly more fragments than the lead-free bullets. The deflection angle was significantly higher for the dimensionally stable bullet due to its tumbling behavior and was similarly low for the other bullets. The deforming bullets achieved higher reproducibility than the fragmenting and dimensionally stable bullets.
CONCLUSION: The deforming lead-free bullet closely resembled the deforming lead-containing bullet in terms of energy conversion, deflection angle, cavity shape, and reproducibility, showing that similar terminal ballistic behavior can be achieved. Furthermore, the volumetric image processing allowed superior analysis compared to methods that involve cutting of the soap blocks.

References

  1. Am J Pathol. 2014 Feb;184(2):431-41 [PMID: 24262753]
  2. PLoS One. 2011 Apr 06;6(4):e15350 [PMID: 21494326]
  3. Int J Legal Med. 2010 Nov;124(6):613-6 [PMID: 20725735]
  4. Int J Legal Med. 2013 Jul;127(4):791-7 [PMID: 23250385]
  5. Int J Legal Med. 2008 Jan;122(1):81-5 [PMID: 17345089]
  6. Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Jan 10;214(1-3):82-7 [PMID: 21813255]
  7. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2012;29(7):1052-7 [PMID: 22651819]
  8. Annu Rev Med. 2004;55:209-22 [PMID: 14746518]
  9. Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Oct 15;44(20):7759-60 [PMID: 20809587]
  10. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2009 Nov;12(9):908-16 [PMID: 19531006]
  11. Radiology. 2011 Sep;260(3):709-17 [PMID: 21788527]
  12. PLoS One. 2010 Apr 26;5(4):e10315 [PMID: 20436670]
  13. PLoS Med. 2008 May 27;5(5):e101 [PMID: 18507497]
  14. Environ Pollut. 2006 Jul;142(1):93-7 [PMID: 16280190]
  15. Sci Total Environ. 2012 Jan 1;414:90-7 [PMID: 22137649]
  16. Int J Legal Med. 2008 Jan;122(1):1-5 [PMID: 17205351]
  17. PLoS Med. 2008 May 27;5(5):e112 [PMID: 18507499]
  18. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997 May-Jun;21(3):481-6 [PMID: 9135663]
  19. Sci Total Environ. 2010 Dec 1;409(1):95-9 [PMID: 20937520]
  20. PLoS One. 2011 Apr 06;6(4):e17656 [PMID: 21494329]
  21. Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1982;508:79-88 [PMID: 6952706]
  22. Sci Total Environ. 2013 Jan 15;443:226-32 [PMID: 23186634]
  23. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012 Nov;50(11):4180-90 [PMID: 22939931]
  24. PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e4022 [PMID: 19107211]
  25. Ambio. 2013 Oct;42(6):737-45 [PMID: 23288616]
  26. Environ Res. 2009 Nov;109(8):952-9 [PMID: 19747676]
  27. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51978 [PMID: 23284837]
  28. Sci Total Environ. 2007 Mar 1;374(1):71-9 [PMID: 17276492]
  29. N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 17;348(16):1517-26 [PMID: 12700371]
  30. Sci Total Environ. 2008 May 15;394(2-3):283-9 [PMID: 18313729]
  31. Clin Radiol. 2008 Oct;63(10):1160-6 [PMID: 18774364]
  32. Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Oct 1;40(19):6143-50 [PMID: 17051813]
  33. Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Jul;116(7):976-80 [PMID: 18629324]
  34. PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5330 [PMID: 19390698]
  35. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 10;109(28):11449-54 [PMID: 22733770]
  36. Circulation. 2006 Sep 26;114(13):1388-94 [PMID: 16982939]
  37. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2012 Jan;62(1):145-53 [PMID: 21512804]
  38. Environ Health Perspect. 2013 Jun;121(6):A178-9 [PMID: 23732085]

MeSH Term

Firearms
Gelatin
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Lead
Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Chemicals

Lead
Gelatin

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bulletslead-freesoaplead-containingballisticdeformingbullethuntingdimensionallystablecavityfragmentingblocksvolumefragmentsdeflectionanglereproducibilityenergyachievedperformedterminalexperimentsusedcreateddamageshapeShotsimageshowedincreasingdepositedconversionratiosignificantlyhigherbehaviorBACKGROUND:Lead-freealternativecausehealthriskshumansendangeredscavengingraptorsleadingestionHoweverdoubtsconcerningeffectivenesshinderwide-spreadacceptancewildlifemanagementcommunityMETHODS:standardizedconditionssurrogategameanimaltissuecharacterizepartiallyonecommonlypermanentcavitiesmeasurepotentialwoundimagedusingcomputedtomographyassessnumberdifferentimpactspeedscoveringrealisticshootingrangeUsing3DsegmentationmetalfragmentcountdepthmaximumdeterminedrepeatedinvestigateRESULTS:constantcopperincreaseslinearlytotalhundredsduetumblingsimilarlylowCONCLUSION:closelyresembledtermsshowingsimilarcanFurthermorevolumetricprocessingallowedsuperioranalysiscomparedmethodsinvolvecuttingPerformanceversuslead-basedammunition

Similar Articles

Cited By