Dispersal distance is influenced by parental and grand-parental density.

E V Bitume, D Bonte, O Ronce, I Olivieri, C M Nieberding
Author Information
  1. E V Bitume: Evolutionary Ecology and Genetics Group, Biodiversity Research Centre, Earth and Life Institute, Académie Louvain, Croix du Sud 4, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution, Université Montpellier 2, CNRS, CC65, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, France ebitume@gmail.com.
  2. D Bonte: Terrestrial Ecology Unit, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  3. O Ronce: Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution, Université Montpellier 2, CNRS, CC65, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, France.
  4. I Olivieri: Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution, Université Montpellier 2, CNRS, CC65, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, France.
  5. C M Nieberding: Evolutionary Ecology and Genetics Group, Biodiversity Research Centre, Earth and Life Institute, Académie Louvain, Croix du Sud 4, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

Abstract

Non-genetic transmission of information across generations, so-called parental effects, can have significant impacts on offspring morphology, physiology, behaviour and life-history traits. In previous experimental work using the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch, we demonstrated that dispersal distances increase with local density and levels of genetic relatedness. We here show that manipulation of parental and grand-parental density has a significant effect on offspring dispersal distance, of the same order of magnitude as manipulation of offspring density. We demonstrate that offspring exposed to the same density disperse further if they were born to parents exposed to higher density compared with parents exposed to low density. Offspring dispersal distance also increases when grand-parents were exposed to higher density, except for offspring exposed to low densities, which disperse at shorter distances whatever the grand-parental density. We also show that offspring from mothers exposed to higher densities were overall larger, which suggests that parents in high densities invest more in individual offspring, enabling them to disperse further. We propose that our findings should be included in models investigating the spread rate of invasive species or when predicting the success of conservation measures of species attempting to track changing climates.

Keywords

References

  1. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2012 May;87(2):290-312 [PMID: 21929715]
  2. Nat Rev Genet. 2011 Jun 17;12(7):475-86 [PMID: 21681209]
  3. Nat Rev Genet. 2006 May;7(5):395-401 [PMID: 16534512]
  4. Ecol Lett. 2014 Jun;17(6):756-67 [PMID: 24690406]
  5. Nature. 2001 Aug 2;412(6846):538-43 [PMID: 11484053]
  6. BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Aug 06;7:133 [PMID: 17683620]
  7. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2005 May;80(2):205-25 [PMID: 15921049]
  8. Am Nat. 2007 Oct;170(4):520-9 [PMID: 17891731]
  9. Horm Behav. 2011 Mar;59(3):306-14 [PMID: 20620140]
  10. J Theor Biol. 2011 Aug 7;282(1):93-9 [PMID: 21605568]
  11. Am J Bot. 2005 Jun;92(6):960-71 [PMID: 21652479]
  12. Annu Rev Entomol. 2000;45:341-69 [PMID: 10761581]
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 22;105(16):5980-5 [PMID: 18408150]
  14. Ecology. 2013 Nov;94(11):2575-82 [PMID: 24400509]
  15. Nature. 1996 Apr 18;380(6575):619-21 [PMID: 8602260]
  16. Ecol Lett. 2013 Apr;16(4):430-7 [PMID: 23294510]
  17. Science. 2011 Nov 25;334(6059):1127-9 [PMID: 22052976]
  18. Ecol Lett. 2009 Mar;12(3):197-209 [PMID: 19170731]
  19. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Feb 1;16(2):95-100 [PMID: 11165708]
  20. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Apr 27;364(1520):1075-86 [PMID: 19324612]
  21. Am Nat. 1999 Dec;154(6):674-689 [PMID: 10600612]
  22. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Apr 27;364(1520):1169-77 [PMID: 19324619]
  23. Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Oct 1;13(10):403-7 [PMID: 21238360]
  24. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26927 [PMID: 22066017]
  25. Science. 2006 Aug 11;313(5788):789-91 [PMID: 16902127]
  26. Oecologia. 1996 Jun;106(4):470-477 [PMID: 28307446]
  27. Am Nat. 2006 Jul;168(1):88-99 [PMID: 16874616]
  28. Nature. 2000 Aug 31;406(6799):985-8 [PMID: 10984050]
  29. Am Nat. 2010 Jan;175(1):38-49 [PMID: 19911910]
  30. Am Nat. 2008 Feb;171(2):225-37 [PMID: 18197775]
  31. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 5;104(23):9703-8 [PMID: 17522252]

MeSH Term

Animal Distribution
Animals
Body Size
Female
Life Cycle Stages
Male
Maternal Exposure
Phenotype
Population Density
Tetranychidae

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0densityoffspringexposeddispersalparentalgrand-parentaldistancedisperseparentshigherdensitieseffectssignificantdistancesshowmanipulationlowalsospeciesNon-genetictransmissioninformationacrossgenerationsso-calledcanimpactsmorphologyphysiologybehaviourlife-historytraitspreviousexperimentalworkusingtwo-spottedspidermiteTetranychusurticaeKochdemonstratedincreaselocallevelsgeneticrelatednesseffectordermagnitudedemonstrateborncomparedOffspringincreasesgrand-parentsexceptshorterwhatevermothersoveralllargersuggestshighinvestindividualenablingproposefindingsincludedmodelsinvestigatingspreadrateinvasivepredictingsuccessconservationmeasuresattemptingtrackchangingclimatesDispersalinfluencedconditionalinvasionmaternalplasticity

Similar Articles

Cited By