Controlling Relations in Stimulus Equivalence Classes of Preschool Children and Individuals with Down Syndrome.

Priscila C Grisante, Julio C de Rose, William J McIlvane
Author Information
  1. Priscila C Grisante: Universidade Federal de São Carlos ; Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia sobre Comportamento, Cognição e Ensino.
  2. Julio C de Rose: Universidade Federal de São Carlos ; Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia sobre Comportamento, Cognição e Ensino.
  3. William J McIlvane: Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia sobre Comportamento, Cognição e Ensino ; University of Massachusetts Medical School.

Abstract

We evaluated emergent stimulus-stimulus relations after two different training procedures. Participants were five typically developing preschool children and three individuals with Down Syndrome. Experiment 1 used two-comparison matching to sample (MTS) to establish AB and BC relations. Experiment 2 used two-comparison and blank-comparison MTS, each on 50% of training trials to establish AB and BC relations. In both experiments, tests for emergent relations (AC, CA) were conducted to assess equivalence class formation. In Experiment 2 subsequently, class expansion was assessed after CD training. All participants showed positive equivalence test outcomes. Seven showed class expansion. After class formation tests in both studies, probe tests were conducted for and relations in baseline relations. Initial results were somewhat variable, but became more consistent after class expansion.

Keywords

References

  1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Nov;46(3):243-57 [PMID: 3805973]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Jul;80(1):131-57 [PMID: 13677612]
  3. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Mar;73(2):177-93 [PMID: 10784008]
  4. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 May;37(3):329-48 [PMID: 6178786]
  5. Behav Anal. 1992 Spring;15(1):89-94 [PMID: 22478119]
  6. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 May;41(3):251-66 [PMID: 6736856]
  7. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Sep;48(2):187-208 [PMID: 3681184]
  8. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):5-22 [PMID: 7057129]
  9. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jul;58(1):183-204 [PMID: 16812663]
  10. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 May;15(3):347-54 [PMID: 4252714]
  11. J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Nov;84(3):417-33 [PMID: 16596973]
  12. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 May;53(3):345-58 [PMID: 2341819]
  13. J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Sep;92(2):245-56 [PMID: 20354602]
  14. J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Mar;71(2):195-214 [PMID: 10220930]
  15. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jul;74(1):101-14 [PMID: 10966098]
  16. Behav Anal. 2003 Fall;26(2):195-213 [PMID: 22478402]
  17. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):185-241 [PMID: 16812780]
  18. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2001;28:101-38 [PMID: 11605362]
  19. Behav Processes. 2005 Jun 30;69(3):281-93 [PMID: 15896527]
  20. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Jul;52(1):1-12 [PMID: 2769172]
  21. Am J Ment Retard. 1990 Nov;95(3):260-70 [PMID: 2261159]
  22. J Exp Child Psychol. 1993 Oct;56(2):201-39 [PMID: 8245768]
  23. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jul;74(1):127-46 [PMID: 10966100]
  24. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Nov;54(3):239-50 [PMID: 2103584]
  25. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Nov;60(3):571-85 [PMID: 8283149]

Grants

  1. P30 HD004147/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. R01 MH090272/NIMH NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0relationsclasstrainingSyndromeExperimenttestsexpansionemergentpreschoolchildrenusedtwo-comparisonmatchingsampleMTSestablishABBC2conductedequivalenceformationshowedevaluatedstimulus-stimulustwodifferentproceduresParticipantsfivetypicallydevelopingthreeindividuals1blank-comparison50%trialsexperimentsACCAassesssubsequentlyassessedCDparticipantspositivetestoutcomesSevenstudiesprobebaselineInitialresultssomewhatvariablebecameconsistentControllingRelationsStimulusEquivalenceClassesPreschoolChildrenIndividualsDownselectreject

Similar Articles

Cited By