Transitive and anti-transitive emergent relations in pigeons: support for a theory of stimulus-class formation.

Peter J Urcuioli, Melissa J Swisher
Author Information
  1. Peter J Urcuioli: Purdue University, United States. Electronic address: urcuioli@purdue.edu.
  2. Melissa J Swisher: Purdue University, United States.

Abstract

Stimulus class formation is inferred when conditional discrimination training yields new (emergent) conditional relations between the training stimuli. The present experiments demonstrated two such relations in pigeons after successive matching-to-sample training. Experiment 1 showed that transitivity (AC matching) emerged after training on AB and BC arbitrary matching plus BB identity matching: pigeons responded relatively more to the comparisons on AC test trials in which both the A samples and C comparisons were elements of reinforced arbitrary baseline relations involving the same nominal B stimulus. Experiment 2 showed the opposite effect ("anti-transitivity") after training on the same arbitrary relations but with BB oddity instead: pigeons responded relatively more to the comparisons on AC test trials in which the A sample was an element of a reinforced baseline relation and the C comparison was an element of a non-reinforced baseline relation, or vice versa. Experiment 2 also showed that AB and BC training alone generally does not yield an emergent effect. These findings extend the range of emergent phenomena observed in non-human animals and are consistent with predictions from Urcuioli's (2008) theory of pigeons' stimulus class formation. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Tribute to Tom Zentall.

Keywords

References

  1. J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):156-60 [PMID: 24249703]
  2. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2001 Sep;7(3):182-94 [PMID: 11676097]
  3. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Nov;62(3):399-408 [PMID: 16812749]
  4. J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Jul;100(1):49-60 [PMID: 23703090]
  5. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jul;74(1):101-14 [PMID: 10966098]
  6. Behav Processes. 2010 Oct;85(3):226-35 [PMID: 20708666]
  7. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 May;49(3):395-409 [PMID: 16812547]
  8. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):5-22 [PMID: 7057129]
  9. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):185-241 [PMID: 16812780]
  10. J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Nov;96(3):329-41 [PMID: 22084494]
  11. J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Nov;94(3):267-82 [PMID: 21541171]
  12. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jul;74(1):127-46 [PMID: 10966100]
  13. J Speech Hear Res. 1971 Mar;14(1):5-13 [PMID: 5550631]
  14. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Jun;132(2):266-76 [PMID: 12825640]
  15. J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Jan;97(1):5-27 [PMID: 22287802]
  16. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Nov;46(3):243-57 [PMID: 3805973]
  17. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jul;44(1):35-47 [PMID: 16812425]
  18. J Exp Child Psychol. 1997 Jul;66(1):1-17 [PMID: 9226931]
  19. J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):38-50 [PMID: 24248538]
  20. J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Jul;92(1):57-84 [PMID: 20119522]
  21. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Nov;70(3):235-51 [PMID: 9821678]
  22. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jul;68(1):27-45 [PMID: 16812849]
  23. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Sep;68(2):271-96 [PMID: 16812863]
  24. J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Nov;90(3):257-82 [PMID: 19070336]
  25. J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Nov;98(3):283-93 [PMID: 23144506]
  26. Res Dev Disabil. 1995 May-Jun;16(3):179-204 [PMID: 7652201]
  27. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1964;29:141-69 [PMID: 14125361]
  28. Anim Cogn. 2014 Jul;17(4):879-90 [PMID: 24337783]
  29. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Jul;42(1):143-57 [PMID: 16812380]
  30. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Nov;78(3):467-95 [PMID: 12507015]
  31. J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Sep;84(2):147-65 [PMID: 16262184]
  32. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 May;45(3):297-304 [PMID: 3711776]
  33. J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):130-51 [PMID: 24170540]
  34. Am J Ment Defic. 1973 Mar;77(5):556-66 [PMID: 4122227]
  35. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Mar;57(2):227-41 [PMID: 1573374]
  36. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):23-44 [PMID: 7057127]
  37. Behav Processes. 2004 Mar 31;65(3):241-51 [PMID: 14998661]
  38. Brain Behav Evol. 2004;63(3):181-8 [PMID: 14745244]
  39. J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jan;101(1):10-25 [PMID: 24436073]
  40. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1989 Oct;15(4):338-46 [PMID: 2794870]
  41. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jan;43(1):21-42 [PMID: 3156941]
  42. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jan;73(1):5-22 [PMID: 10682337]

Grants

  1. R01 HD061322/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Behavior, Animal
Color Perception
Columbidae
Conditioning, Operant
Discrimination Learning
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Psychological Theory

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0trainingrelationsemergentformationpigeonsExperimentshowedACmatchingarbitrarycomparisonsbaselineStimulusclassconditionalABBCBBrespondedrelativelytesttrialsCreinforcedstimulus2effectelementrelationtheoryinferreddiscriminationyieldsnewstimulipresentexperimentsdemonstratedtwosuccessivematching-to-sample1transitivityemergedplusidentitymatching:sampleselementsinvolvingnominalBopposite"anti-transitivity"oddityinstead:samplecomparisonnon-reinforcedviceversaalsoalonegenerallyyieldfindingsextendrangephenomenaobservednon-humananimalsconsistentpredictionsUrcuioli's2008pigeons'articlepartSpecialIssueentitled:TributeTomZentallTransitiveanti-transitivepigeons:supportstimulus-classAnti-transitivityEmergentPigeonsclassesSuccessiveTransitivity

Similar Articles

Cited By