Minimally invasive endoscopic staging for mediastinal lymphadenopathy in lung cancer: a systematic review protocol.

Hong Liu, Jie Zhou, Qiao-ling Feng, Gang Wan, Yong-jun Xie, Hai-tao Gu
Author Information
  1. Hong Liu: Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  2. Jie Zhou: Department of Ultrasonography, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  3. Qiao-ling Feng: Key Laboratory of Diagnostic Medicine of Education Ministry, Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  4. Gang Wan: Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
  5. Yong-jun Xie: National Center for Medical Simulation of China, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China Department of Histo-anatomy, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China.
  6. Hai-tao Gu: Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive endoscopic biopsy techniques have been widely available as potential alternatives for mediastinal lesions staging in patients with known or suspected lung cancer. Previous efforts have been made to evaluate the diagnostic performance of specific endoscopic modality alone at the level of the mediastinum for staging lung cancer, however, few studies focus on the accuracy of comparisons between different endoscopic modalities, especially at the level of any individual lymph node station. The objective of our study is to determine the diagnostic yields of different endoscopic modalities for staging mediastinal lymphadenopathy in lung cancer, especially concerning the individual lymph node station.
METHODS/DESIGN: A systematic electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, SinoMed and ISI Web of Science were performed to identify studies evaluating endoscopic modalities accuracy with restriction of English and Chinese languages from inception to an update until May 2014. Data were extracted with the patient as the unit of analysis with regards to the abilities of different endoscopic modalities at the level of mediastinum and particular lymph node station. The methodological quality was assessed independently according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Study (QADAS) criteria. An exact binomial rendition of bivariate mixed-effects regression model was used to estimate the pooled sensitivity and specificity. Also, pre-post probability analysis, publication bias analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed for a synthesis of knowledge of this context.
DISSEMINATION: The findings will advance our better available knowledge of optimal clinical decision-making when dealing with staging of mediastinal metastasis in lung cancer.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO-NIHR Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42014009792).

References

  1. Endoscopy. 2005 Sep;37(9):833-9 [PMID: 16116534]
  2. Lancet Oncol. 2012 May;13(5):e221-9 [PMID: 22554550]
  3. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69-90 [PMID: 21296855]
  4. Chest. 2013 May;143(5 Suppl):41S-50S [PMID: 23649432]
  5. Methods Inf Med. 2005;44(1):124-6 [PMID: 15778803]
  6. Cancer Cytopathol. 2014 Aug;122(8):561-76 [PMID: 24760496]
  7. Stat Med. 1993 Jul 30;12(14):1293-316 [PMID: 8210827]
  8. Eur Respir J. 2009 May;33(5):1156-64 [PMID: 19407050]
  9. Eur Radiol. 2007 Jul;17(7):1806-12 [PMID: 17206430]
  10. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug;41(7):644-6 [PMID: 17667046]
  11. Mol Clin Oncol. 2014 Jan;2(1):151-155 [PMID: 24649325]
  12. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jul 27;343(4):254-61 [PMID: 10911007]
  13. Thorax. 2009 Sep;64(9):757-62 [PMID: 19454408]
  14. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Oct;36(4):731-6 [PMID: 19632852]
  15. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb;32(1):62-8 [PMID: 21500125]
  16. JAMA Surg. 2013 Nov;148(11):1024-9 [PMID: 24048268]
  17. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jul 12;6:31 [PMID: 16836745]
  18. BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700 [PMID: 19622552]
  19. Ann Thorac Med. 2011 Apr;6(2):77-81 [PMID: 21572696]
  20. Ann Surg. 2003 Aug;238(2):180-8 [PMID: 12894010]
  21. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529-36 [PMID: 22007046]
  22. Control Clin Trials. 1981 Jun;2(2):93-113 [PMID: 7273794]
  23. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):221-8, W-48 [PMID: 19581636]
  24. Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):455-63 [PMID: 10877304]
  25. J Thorac Dis. 2013 Oct;5 Suppl 5:S498-510 [PMID: 24163743]
  26. Chest. 2011 Dec;140(6):1557-1566 [PMID: 21659432]
  27. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 20;23(33):8283-5 [PMID: 16219928]
  28. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Oct;58(10):982-90 [PMID: 16168343]
  29. Chest. 2005 Feb;127(2):418-20 [PMID: 15705972]
  30. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Oct;96(4):1502-1507 [PMID: 23993894]
  31. Eur J Cancer. 2013 May;49(8):1860-7 [PMID: 23481511]
  32. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Jul;32(1):1-8 [PMID: 17448671]
  33. Chest. 2012 Aug;142(2):385-393 [PMID: 21980059]
  34. Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 15;2:13 [PMID: 23414575]
  35. BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34 [PMID: 9310563]
  36. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Nov;118(5):894-9 [PMID: 10534695]
  37. Eur J Cancer. 2009 May;45(8):1389-96 [PMID: 19124238]
  38. J Clin Pathol. 2014 Jan;67(1):76-80 [PMID: 23969273]
  39. JAMA. 2005 Aug 24;294(8):931-6 [PMID: 16118383]
  40. Respiration. 2006;73(5):583-6 [PMID: 17008786]
  41. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Nov;96(5):1756-60 [PMID: 23953728]

MeSH Term

Biopsy, Needle
Endosonography
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
Lymphatic Diseases
Mediastinal Diseases
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Neoplasm Staging
Prospective Studies
Systematic Reviews as Topic

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0endoscopicstaginglungmediastinalcancermodalitiesanalysisleveldifferentlymphnodestationMinimallyinvasiveavailablediagnosticmediastinumstudiesaccuracyespeciallyindividuallymphadenopathysystematicperformedsensitivityknowledgeINTRODUCTION:biopsytechniqueswidelypotentialalternativeslesionspatientsknownsuspectedPreviouseffortsmadeevaluateperformancespecificmodalityalonehoweverfocuscomparisonsobjectivestudydetermineyieldsconcerningMETHODS/DESIGN:electronicsearchMEDLINEEMBASESinoMedISIWebScienceidentifyevaluatingrestrictionEnglishChineselanguagesinceptionupdateMay2014DataextractedpatientunitregardsabilitiesparticularmethodologicalqualityassessedindependentlyaccordingQualityAssessmentDiagnosticAccuracyStudyQADAScriteriaexactbinomialrenditionbivariatemixed-effectsregressionmodelusedestimatepooledspecificityAlsopre-postprobabilitypublicationbiassynthesiscontextDISSEMINATION:findingswilladvancebetteroptimalclinicaldecision-makingdealingmetastasisTRIALREGISTRATIONNUMBER:PROSPERO-NIHRProspectiveRegisterSystematicReviewsCRD42014009792cancer:reviewprotocol

Similar Articles

Cited By