A content analysis of weight stigmatization in popular television programming for adolescents.

Marla E Eisenberg, Ashley Carlson-McGuire, Sarah E Gollust, Dianne Neumark-Sztainer
Author Information
  1. Marla E Eisenberg: Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  2. Ashley Carlson-McGuire: Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  3. Sarah E Gollust: Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  4. Dianne Neumark-Sztainer: Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study provides updated information regarding the prevalence and characteristics of Weight stigma in popular adolescent television programming, using a sample of favorite shows named by diverse adolescents.
METHOD: Participants in a large, population-based study of Minnesota adolescents (N = 2,793, mean age = 14.4) listed their top three favorite television shows. A coding instrument was developed to analyze randomly selected episodes from the most popular 10 programs. Weight-stigmatizing incidents were compared across television show characteristics and characters' gender and Weight status.
RESULTS: Half (50%) of the 30 episodes analyzed contained at least one Weight-stigmatizing incident. Both youth- and adult-targeted shows contained Weight-stigmatizing comments, but the percent of these comments was much higher for youth-targeted (55.6%) than general audience-targeted shows (8.3%). Male characters were more likely than females to engage in (72.7% vs. 27.3%), and be the targets of, Weight stigma (63.6% vs. 36.4%), and there was no difference in the amount of Weight stigmatizing directed at average Weight females compared to overweight females. Targets of these instances showed a negative response in only about one-third of cases, but audience laughter followed 40.9% of cases.
DISCUSSION: The portrayal of Weight stigmatization on popular television shows-including targeting women of average Weight-sends signals to adolescents about the wide acceptability of this behavior and the expected response, which may be harmful. Prevention of Weight stigmatization should take a multi-faceted approach and include the media. Future research should explore the impact that Weight-related stigma in television content has on viewers.

Keywords

References

  1. Eat Weight Disord. 2005 Jun;10(2):107-16 [PMID: 16114224]
  2. Pediatrics. 1999 Mar;103(3):E36 [PMID: 10049992]
  3. Obes Facts. 2010 Feb;3(1):41-6 [PMID: 20215794]
  4. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Aug;157(8):733-8 [PMID: 12912777]
  5. Am J Public Health. 2003 Aug;93(8):1342-8 [PMID: 12893625]
  6. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Mar;15(3):712-8 [PMID: 17372322]
  7. Body Image. 2008 Jun;5(2):141-51 [PMID: 18456583]
  8. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2009 Jan;18(1):49-65 [PMID: 19014857]
  9. Body Image. 2007 Jun;4(2):147-55 [PMID: 18089260]
  10. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002 Jan;26(1):123-31 [PMID: 11791157]
  11. Pediatrics. 2001 Jan;107(1):54-60 [PMID: 11134434]
  12. J Adolesc Health. 2006 Jun;38(6):675-83 [PMID: 16730595]
  13. Am J Public Health. 1990 Jun;80(6):738-40 [PMID: 2343968]
  14. Obes Rev. 2003 Feb;4(1):57-71 [PMID: 12608527]
  15. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74 [PMID: 843571]
  16. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Aug;157(8):746-52 [PMID: 12912779]
  17. Psychol Bull. 2007 Jul;133(4):557-80 [PMID: 17592956]
  18. Prev Med. 2012 Jan;54(1):77-81 [PMID: 22024221]
  19. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2011 Dec;58(6):1393-401, x [PMID: 22093858]
  20. Soc Sci Med. 2012 May;74(10):1544-51 [PMID: 22445762]
  21. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011 Sep;8(5):A94 [PMID: 21843424]
  22. Int J Eat Disord. 2003 Jul;34(1):108-17 [PMID: 12772175]
  23. Pediatrics. 2006 Feb;117(2):e209-15 [PMID: 16452330]
  24. BMJ. 2005 Feb 5;330(7486):301-4 [PMID: 15695279]
  25. Eat Behav. 2003 Mar;4(1):53-78 [PMID: 15000988]
  26. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009 May;17(5):941-64 [PMID: 19165161]

Grants

  1. R01 HL084064/NHLBI NIH HHS
  2. R01HL084064/NHLBI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Body Weight
Female
Humans
Male
Minnesota
Overweight
Personal Satisfaction
Sex Factors
Social Stigma
Stereotyping
Television

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0weighttelevisionadolescentspopularshowsstigmatizationstigmafemalesstudycharacteristicsprogrammingfavorite=episodescomparedcontainedweight-stigmatizingcomments6%3%vsaverageresponsecasesmediacontentOBJECTIVE:providesupdatedinformationregardingprevalenceadolescentusingsamplenameddiverseMETHOD:Participantslargepopulation-basedMinnesotaN2793meanage144listedtopthreecodinginstrumentdevelopedanalyzerandomlyselected10programsWeight-stigmatizingincidentsacrossshowcharacters'genderstatusRESULTS:Half50%30analyzedleastoneincidentyouth-adult-targetedpercentmuchhigheryouth-targeted55generalaudience-targeted8Malecharacterslikelyengage727%27targets63364%differenceamountstigmatizingdirectedoverweightTargetsinstancesshowednegativeone-thirdaudiencelaughterfollowed409%DISCUSSION:portrayalshows-includingtargetingwomenweight-sendssignalswideacceptabilitybehaviorexpectedmayharmfulPreventiontakemulti-facetedapproachincludeFutureresearchexploreimpactweight-relatedviewersanalysisexposureteasing

Similar Articles

Cited By (23)