The exercise paradox: An interactional model for a clearer conceptualization of exercise addiction.

Alexei Y Egorov, Attila Szabo
Author Information
  1. Alexei Y Egorov: ; ;
  2. Attila Szabo: ;

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Exercise addiction receives substantial attention in the field of behavioral addictions. It is a unique form of addiction because in contrast to other addictive disorders it is carried out with major physical-effort and high energy expenditure.
METHODS: A critical literature review was performed.
RESULTS: The literature evaluation shows that most published accounts report the levels of risk for exercise addiction rather than actual cases or morbidities. The inconsistent prevalence of exercise addiction, ranging from 0.3% to 77.0%, reported in the literature may be ascribed to incomplete conceptual models for the morbidity. Current explanations of exercise addiction may suggest that the disorder is progressive from healthy to unhealthy exercise pattern. This approach drives research into the wrong direction.
DISCUSSION: An interactional model is offered accounting for the adoption, maintenance, and transformation of exercise behavior. The here proposed model has an idiosyncratic black-box containing the antecedents and characteristics that are unique to the individual, which cannot be researched via the nomothetic approach. Subjective aspects in the black-box interact with stressful life events that force the person to cope. The range of coping may be wide. Escape into exercise depends on personal (subjective) and situational (objective) factors, but the subjective components are inaccessible for a priori scholastic scrutiny. It is our view that currently only this dual interactional model may account for the fact that exercise addiction emerges suddenly and only in a few individuals from among those at high risk, estimated to be around 3.0% of the exercising population.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Addict. 2005 Jan-Feb;14(1):1-7 [PMID: 15804872]
  2. Br J Sports Med. 2000 Dec;34(6):431-5 [PMID: 11131230]
  3. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1987 Apr;19(2):91-9 [PMID: 3574055]
  4. Science. 2001 Nov 2;294(5544):980-2 [PMID: 11691967]
  5. Br J Sports Med. 2000 Apr;34(2):125-32 [PMID: 10786869]
  6. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1970 Apr;22(4):365-9 [PMID: 4313770]
  7. Subst Use Misuse. 2012 Mar;47(4):403-17 [PMID: 22216780]
  8. Psychol Rev. 2004 Jan;111(1):33-51 [PMID: 14756584]
  9. Am J Psychother. 1988 Oct;42(4):574-84 [PMID: 3213846]
  10. Sports Med. 2007;37(6):477-84 [PMID: 17503874]
  11. Eat Disord. 2002 Spring;10(1):31-47 [PMID: 16864243]
  12. J Behav Addict. 2012 Mar;1(1):28-34 [PMID: 26166828]
  13. Eat Disord. 2002 Spring;10(1):49-60 [PMID: 16864244]
  14. J Behav Addict. 2013 Mar;2(1):50-5 [PMID: 26165771]
  15. Phys Sportsmed. 1979 Feb;7(2):55-77 [PMID: 29256731]
  16. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007 Jun;10(3):323-9 [PMID: 17594255]
  17. Psychiatry Res. 2011 Sep 30;189(2):270-5 [PMID: 21459457]
  18. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Apr;24(2):447-53 [PMID: 22882175]
  19. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(2):255-60 [PMID: 21484043]
  20. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Oct;8(10):4069-81 [PMID: 22073029]
  21. Br J Sports Med. 2005 Jun;39(6):e30 [PMID: 15911594]
  22. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Aug;8(8):3399-415 [PMID: 21909314]
  23. Aust J Sci Med Sport. 1995 Sep;27(3):68-75 [PMID: 8599747]
  24. J Psychosom Res. 1980;24(3-4):179-91 [PMID: 7441586]
  25. J Sports Sci. 2012;30(8):755-66 [PMID: 22420455]
  26. Sci Am. 2002 Feb;286(2):74-80 [PMID: 11828703]
  27. J Gambl Stud. 2011 Jun;27(2):203-14 [PMID: 20559694]
  28. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1990 Sep;30(3):283-90 [PMID: 2266760]
  29. Eval Health Prof. 2011 Mar;34(1):3-56 [PMID: 20876085]
  30. J Behav Addict. 2013 Sep;2(3):179-86 [PMID: 25215199]
  31. J Behav Addict. 2012 Dec;1(4):186-90 [PMID: 26165606]
  32. Compr Psychiatry. 2008 Jul-Aug;49(4):353-8 [PMID: 18555055]
  33. Br J Addict. 1987 Jul;82(7):735-40 [PMID: 3311101]
  34. Int J Eat Disord. 1998 Apr;23(3):267-75 [PMID: 9547661]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0exerciseaddictionmaymodelliteratureinteractionaluniquehighreviewrisk0%approachresearchtransformationblack-boxsubjectiveBACKGROUNDANDAIMS:Exercisereceivessubstantialattentionfieldbehavioraladdictionsformcontrastaddictivedisorderscarriedmajorphysical-effortenergyexpenditureMETHODS:criticalperformedRESULTS:evaluationshowspublishedaccountsreportlevelsratheractualcasesmorbiditiesinconsistentprevalenceranging03%77reportedascribedincompleteconceptualmodelsmorbidityCurrentexplanationssuggestdisorderprogressivehealthyunhealthypatterndriveswrongdirectionDISCUSSION:offeredaccountingadoptionmaintenancebehaviorproposedidiosyncraticcontainingantecedentscharacteristicsindividualresearchedvianomotheticSubjectiveaspectsinteractstressfullifeeventsforcepersoncoperangecopingwideEscapedependspersonalsituationalobjectivefactorscomponentsinaccessiblepriorischolasticscrutinyviewcurrentlydualaccountfactemergessuddenlyindividualsamongestimatedaround3exercisingpopulationparadox:clearerconceptualizationdependenceabusetheory

Similar Articles

Cited By