Acellular vaccines for preventing whooping cough in children.

Linjie Zhang, Sílvio O M Prietsch, Inge Axelsson, Scott A Halperin
Author Information
  1. Linjie Zhang: Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande, Rua Visconde Paranaguá 102, Centro, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil, 96201-900.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Routine use of whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccines was suspended in some countries in the 1970s and 1980s because of concerns about adverse effects. Following this action, there was a resurgence of whooping cough. Acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines, containing purified or recombinant Bordetella pertussis (B. pertussis) antigens, were developed in the hope that they would be as effective, but less reactogenic than the whole-cell vaccines. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 1999, and previously updated in 2012. In this update, we included no new studies.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of acellular pertussis vaccines in children and to compare them with the whole-cell vaccines.
SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (2013, Issue 12), MEDLINE (1950 to January week 2, 2014), EMBASE (1974 to January 2014), Biosis Previews (2009 to January 2014) and CINAHL (2009 to January 2014).
SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected double-blind randomised efficacy and safety trials of aP vaccines in children up to six years old, with active follow-up of participants and laboratory verification of pertussis cases.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the studies. Differences in trial design precluded a meta-analysis of the efficacy data. We pooled the safety data from individual trials using a random-effects meta-analysis model.
MAIN RESULTS: We included six efficacy trials with a total of 46,283 participants and 52 safety trials with a total of 136,541 participants. Most of the safety trials did not report the methods for random sequence generation, allocation concealment and blinding, which made it difficult to assess the risk of bias in the studies. The efficacy of multi-component (≥ three) vaccines varied from 84% to 85% in preventing typical whooping cough (characterised by 21 or more consecutive days of paroxysmal cough with confirmation of B. pertussis infection by culture, appropriate serology or contact with a household member who has culture-confirmed pertussis), and from 71% to 78% in preventing mild pertussis disease (characterised by seven or more consecutive days of cough with confirmation of B. pertussis infection by culture or appropriate serology). In contrast, the efficacy of one- and two-component vaccines varied from 59% to 78% against typical whooping cough and from 41% to 58% against mild pertussis disease. Multi-component acellular vaccines are more effective than low-efficacy whole-cell vaccines, but may be less effective than the highest-efficacy whole-cell vaccines. Most systemic and local adverse events were significantly less common with aP vaccines than with wP vaccines for the primary series as well as for the booster dose.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Multi-component (≥ three) aP vaccines are effective in preventing whooping cough in children. Multi-component aP vaccines have higher efficacy than low-efficacy wP vaccines, but they may be less efficacious than the highest-efficacy wP vaccines. Acellular vaccines have fewer adverse effects than whole-cell vaccines for the primary series as well as for booster doses.

References

  1. Vaccine. 2009 Sep 25;27(42):5709-18 [PMID: 19679218]
  2. Am J Dis Child. 1987 Aug;141(8):844-7 [PMID: 3307386]
  3. Dev Biol Stand. 1997;89:77-81 [PMID: 9272334]
  4. Dev Biol Stand. 1997;89:113-8 [PMID: 9272341]
  5. Pediatrics. 1988 Sep;82(3):293-9 [PMID: 3043367]
  6. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988 Jun;7(3):381-3 [PMID: 3137039]
  7. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993 Feb;12(2):131-5 [PMID: 8426770]
  8. Am J Dis Child. 1986 Sep;140(9):867-71 [PMID: 3526866]
  9. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005 Jun;24(6 Suppl):S117-26 [PMID: 15931139]
  10. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997 Nov;16(11):1038-44 [PMID: 9384336]
  11. Lancet. 1997 Nov 29;350(9091):1569-77 [PMID: 9393335]
  12. Lancet. 1991 Jan 12;337(8733):70-3 [PMID: 1670725]
  13. Dev Biol Stand. 1997;89:99-100 [PMID: 9272337]
  14. N Engl J Med. 1995 Oct 19;333(16):1045-50 [PMID: 7675047]
  15. Pediatrics. 2005 Aug;116(2):e285-94 [PMID: 16061582]
  16. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Dec 15;39(12):1802-9 [PMID: 15578403]
  17. Pediatr Res. 1990 Apr;27(4 Pt 1):353-7 [PMID: 2188202]
  18. J Infect Dis. 1996 Nov;174 Suppl 3:S259-63 [PMID: 8896526]
  19. Lancet. 1997 Jul 19;350(9072):185-6 [PMID: 9250191]
  20. Biologicals. 1999 Jun;27(2):77 [PMID: 10600187]
  21. J Infect Dis. 2008 Mar 1;197(5):643-5 [PMID: 18271744]
  22. Dev Biol Stand. 1997;89:109-12 [PMID: 9272340]
  23. J Pediatr. 1990 Jul;117(1 Pt 1):46-51 [PMID: 2196360]
  24. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2005 Apr;4(2):173-84 [PMID: 15889991]
  25. Dev Biol Stand. 1997;89:49-51 [PMID: 9333568]
  26. Dev Biol Stand. 1997;89:63-6 [PMID: 9333572]
  27. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1987 Apr;6(4):352-63 [PMID: 3495775]
  28. Dev Biol Stand. 1997;89:101-3 [PMID: 9272338]
  29. Dev Biol Stand. 1991;73:51-8 [PMID: 1778334]
  30. Vaccine. 1990 Oct;8(5):457-61 [PMID: 2251872]
  31. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997 Feb;16(2):180-4 [PMID: 9041597]
  32. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994 May;148(5):503-7 [PMID: 8180641]
  33. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000 Feb;19(2):77-88 [PMID: 10746492]
  34. Am J Dis Child. 1993 Aug;147(8):854-7 [PMID: 8394646]
  35. Vaccine. 1997 Oct;15(15):1606-12 [PMID: 9364690]
  36. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Jan 14;60(1):5-9 [PMID: 21228761]
  37. Chest. 2006 Nov;130(5):1547-53 [PMID: 17099036]
  38. Vaccine. 1998 Oct;16(17):1604-10 [PMID: 9713935]
  39. Pediatrics. 1994 Apr;93(4):656-9 [PMID: 8134224]
  40. J Infect Dis. 1989 Nov;160(5):832-7 [PMID: 2809258]
  41. Dev Biol Stand. 1997;89:91-7 [PMID: 9272336]
  42. Pediatrics. 1983 Feb;71(2):200-5 [PMID: 6296755]
  43. J Pediatr. 1994 Jun;124(6):921-6 [PMID: 8201477]
  44. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 1993 Jun;14(3):155-9 [PMID: 8221838]
  45. Pediatr Int. 2004 Dec;46(6):650-5 [PMID: 15660862]
  46. Lakartidningen. 1988 Jun 1;85(22):1994-6 [PMID: 3287070]
  47. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1996 Mar;16(1):39-48 [PMID: 8787364]
  48. Lancet. 1988 Apr 30;1(8592):955-60 [PMID: 2896826]
  49. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2003 Dec;34(4):863-8 [PMID: 15115101]
  50. Vaccine. 1994;12(3):210-4 [PMID: 8165852]
  51. Pediatrics. 1995 Sep;96(3 Pt 2):592-4 [PMID: 7659483]
  52. Am J Dis Child. 1991 Nov;145(11):1285-9 [PMID: 1951222]
  53. Dev Biol Stand. 1991;73:275-83 [PMID: 1778319]
  54. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Aug 1;47(3):401-9 [PMID: 18558875]
  55. Dev Biol Stand. 1997;89:58-62 [PMID: 9333571]
  56. Vaccine. 1997 Jan;15(1):51-60 [PMID: 9041666]
  57. N Engl J Med. 1996 Feb 8;334(6):349-55 [PMID: 8538705]
  58. Vaccine. 2003 May 16;21(17-18):2003-14 [PMID: 12706690]
  59. Pediatrics. 1997 Nov;100(5):772-88 [PMID: 9346976]
  60. JAMA. 1996 Jan 3;275(1):37-41 [PMID: 8531284]
  61. Br J Surg. 2008 Aug;95(8):943-9 [PMID: 18618864]
  62. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2006 Sep;45(7):613-20 [PMID: 16928838]
  63. Am J Dis Child. 1993 Mar;147(3):290-4 [PMID: 8438810]
  64. Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 1988;13 Suppl:143-4 [PMID: 3078803]
  65. Pediatrics. 1998 Jan;101(1 Pt 1):1-11 [PMID: 9417143]
  66. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1994;14(2):91-6 [PMID: 7521636]
  67. Drugs. 2005;65(10):1367-89 [PMID: 15977969]
  68. Am J Dis Child. 1993 Mar;147(3):295-9 [PMID: 8438811]
  69. Dev Biol Stand. 1997;89:52-4 [PMID: 9333569]
  70. Scand J Infect Dis. 1996;28(2):159-63 [PMID: 8792483]
  71. J Pediatr. 1991 Aug;119(2):194-204 [PMID: 1907317]
  72. Infect Immun. 1998 Feb;66(2):594-602 [PMID: 9453614]
  73. Eur J Pediatr. 1993 Jun;152(6):478-83 [PMID: 8335014]
  74. J Infect Dis. 2000 Mar;181(3):1010-3 [PMID: 10720524]
  75. Dev Biol Stand. 1997;89:379-89 [PMID: 9272376]
  76. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997 Jan;16(1):53-8 [PMID: 9002102]
  77. JAMA. 2012 Aug 1;308(5):454-6 [PMID: 22851107]
  78. Dev Biol Stand. 1986;65:185-90 [PMID: 3549397]
  79. J Infect Dis. 1988 Apr;157(4):731-7 [PMID: 2894399]
  80. Lancet. 1984 Jan 21;1(8369):122-6 [PMID: 6140441]
  81. N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 7;368(6):581-2 [PMID: 23388023]
  82. N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 30;367(9):785-7 [PMID: 22894554]
  83. Vaccine. 2003 Oct 1;21(27-30):4194-200 [PMID: 14505898]
  84. Pediatrics. 2006 Sep;118(3):978-84 [PMID: 16950988]
  85. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD001478 [PMID: 10796648]
  86. Lancet. 1997 Aug 2;350(9074):326-9 [PMID: 9251637]
  87. J Infect Dis. 1992 Dec;166(6):1436-41 [PMID: 1431261]
  88. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007 Jan;26(1):31-5 [PMID: 17195702]
  89. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995 Sep;14(9):792-7 [PMID: 8559630]
  90. Vaccine. 2003 Jun 2;21(19-20):2298-306 [PMID: 12744860]
  91. J Infect Dis. 1996 Nov;174 Suppl 3:S270-5 [PMID: 8896528]
  92. Vaccine. 1996 Jun;14(8):767-72 [PMID: 8817823]
  93. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1994 Mar;13(3):193-6 [PMID: 8177626]
  94. Ann Trop Paediatr. 1995 Jun;15(2):141-6 [PMID: 7677415]
  95. Pediatrics. 1995 Sep;96(3 Pt 2):557-66 [PMID: 7659476]
  96. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999 Sep;18(9):772-9 [PMID: 10493336]
  97. CMAJ. 2006 Feb 14;174(4):451-2 [PMID: 16477052]
  98. Pediatrics. 1994 Jan;93(1):37-43 [PMID: 8265321]
  99. Vaccine. 1995 Dec;13(17):1631-5 [PMID: 8719512]
  100. BMJ. 2009 May 21;338:b1772 [PMID: 19460804]
  101. Am J Dis Child. 1986 Sep;140(9):872-6 [PMID: 2874738]
  102. PLoS One. 2010 Apr 15;5(4):e10178 [PMID: 20419113]
  103. Vaccine. 2004 Sep 9;22(27-28):3530-4 [PMID: 15315832]
  104. Dev Biol Stand. 1997;89:83-9 [PMID: 9272335]
  105. Pediatrics. 2000 Jan;105(1):e11 [PMID: 10617748]
  106. Vaccine. 1994 Jan;12(1):81-6 [PMID: 8303945]
  107. Eur J Pediatr. 2008 Feb;167(2):133-9 [PMID: 17668241]
  108. Dev Biol Stand. 1997;89:55-7 [PMID: 9333570]
  109. Vaccine. 1998 Dec;16(20):1907-16 [PMID: 9796042]
  110. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;(3):CD001478 [PMID: 22419280]
  111. Am J Dis Child. 1990 Jan;144(1):41-5 [PMID: 2403747]
  112. Vaccine. 2006 Mar 20;24(13):2440-8 [PMID: 16406224]
  113. Am J Dis Child. 1992 May;146(5):556-9 [PMID: 1621656]
  114. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1988 Sep;7(9):637-45 [PMID: 3050858]
  115. Dev Biol Stand. 1997;89:105-8 [PMID: 9272339]
  116. Vaccine. 2008 Dec 9;26(52):6768-76 [PMID: 18835414]
  117. Pediatrics. 1995 Sep;96(3 Pt 2):548-57 [PMID: 7659475]
  118. Pediatrics. 1992 May;89(5 Pt 1):882-7 [PMID: 1579399]
  119. Dev Biol Stand. 1997;89:123-33 [PMID: 9272342]
  120. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994 Nov;148(11):1220-4 [PMID: 7921131]
  121. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992 Jul;11(7):530-5 [PMID: 1528643]
  122. Vaccine. 1998 Dec;16(20):1901-6 [PMID: 9796041]
  123. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Dec;15(12):927-32 [PMID: 9031875]
  124. J Pediatr. 1992 Dec;121(6):857-61 [PMID: 1447645]
  125. N Engl J Med. 1996 Feb 8;334(6):341-8 [PMID: 8538704]
  126. South Med J. 1993 Mar;86(3):269-75, 284 [PMID: 8451663]

Grants

  1. /Department of Health

MeSH Term

Age Factors
Child
Child, Preschool
Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine
Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines
Humans
Infant
Pertussis Vaccine
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Whooping Cough

Chemicals

Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine
Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines
Pertussis Vaccine

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0vaccinespertussiscoughefficacywhole-cellwhoopingaPsafetytrialswPeffectivelesschildrenJanuary2014preventingadverseAcellularBstudiesparticipantsdataMulti-componenteffectsupdatereviewincludedassessacellular2009sixriskbiasmeta-analysistotalthreevariedtypicalcharacterisedconsecutivedaysconfirmationinfectioncultureappropriateserology78%milddiseaselow-efficacymayhighest-efficacyprimaryserieswellboosterBACKGROUND:Routineusesuspendedcountries1970s1980sconcernsFollowingactionresurgencecontainingpurifiedrecombinantBordetellaantigensdevelopedhopereactogenicCochranefirstpublished1999previouslyupdated2012newOBJECTIVES:compareSEARCHMETHODS:searchedCENTRAL2013Issue12MEDLINE1950week2EMBASE1974BiosisPreviewsCINAHLSELECTIONCRITERIA:selecteddouble-blindrandomisedyearsoldactivefollow-uplaboratoryverificationcasesDATACOLLECTIONANDANALYSIS:TwoauthorsindependentlyextractedassessedDifferencestrialdesignprecludedpooledindividualusingrandom-effectsmodelMAINRESULTS:4628352136541reportmethodsrandomsequencegenerationallocationconcealmentblindingmadedifficultmulti-component84%85%21paroxysmalcontacthouseholdmemberculture-confirmed71%sevencontrastone-two-component59%41%58%systemiclocaleventssignificantlycommondoseAUTHORS'CONCLUSIONS:higherefficaciousfewerdoses

Similar Articles

Cited By