Reading performance is enhanced by visual texture discrimination training in Chinese-speaking children with developmental dyslexia.

Xiangzhi Meng, Ou Lin, Fang Wang, Yuzheng Jiang, Yan Song
Author Information
  1. Xiangzhi Meng: Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing, China; The Joint PekingU-PolyU Center for Child Development and Learning, Peking University, Beijing, China.
  2. Ou Lin: Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
  3. Fang Wang: State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China; Center for Collaboration and Innovation in Brain and Learning Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
  4. Yuzheng Jiang: School of languages and communication, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
  5. Yan Song: State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China; Center for Collaboration and Innovation in Brain and Learning Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High order cognitive processing and learning, such as reading, interact with lower-level sensory processing and learning. Previous studies have reported that visual perceptual training enlarges visual span and, consequently, improves reading speed in young and old people with amblyopia. Recently, a visual perceptual training study in Chinese-speaking children with dyslexia found that the visual texture discrimination thresholds of these children in visual perceptual training significantly correlated with their performance in Chinese character recognition, suggesting that deficits in visual perceptual processing/learning might partly underpin the difficulty in reading Chinese.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To further clarify whether visual perceptual training improves the measures of reading performance, eighteen children with dyslexia and eighteen typically developed readers that were age- and IQ-matched completed a series of reading measures before and after visual texture discrimination task (TDT) training. Prior to the TDT training, each group of children was split into two equivalent training and non-training groups in terms of all reading measures, IQ, and TDT. The results revealed that the discrimination threshold SOAs of TDT were significantly higher for the children with dyslexia than for the control children before training. Interestingly, training significantly decreased the discrimination threshold SOAs of TDT for both the typically developed readers and the children with dyslexia. More importantly, the training group with dyslexia exhibited significant enhancement in reading fluency, while the non-training group with dyslexia did not show this improvement. Additional follow-up tests showed that the improvement in reading fluency is a long-lasting effect and could be maintained for up to two months in the training group with dyslexia.
CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest that basic visual perceptual processing/learning and reading ability in Chinese might at least partially rely on overlapping mechanisms.

References

  1. Cortex. 2000 Feb;36(1):109-23 [PMID: 10728901]
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jun 6;97(12):6832-7 [PMID: 10841578]
  3. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Feb 28;52(2):1164-70 [PMID: 21087972]
  4. Dyslexia. 2014 Aug;20(3):280-96 [PMID: 24643918]
  5. Biol Psychiatry. 2004 May 1;55(9):926-33 [PMID: 15110736]
  6. J Psycholinguist Res. 2013 Oct;42(5):433-50 [PMID: 22923217]
  7. Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Dec;2(4):460-93 [PMID: 24203785]
  8. Vision Res. 2013 Jan 25;77:41-50 [PMID: 23206551]
  9. Vision Res. 2008 Jan;48(2):193-207 [PMID: 18068752]
  10. Science. 1996 Jan 5;271(5245):81-4 [PMID: 8539604]
  11. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Dec 24;99(26):17137-42 [PMID: 12446842]
  12. Int J Psychophysiol. 1994 Dec;18(3):241-9 [PMID: 7775221]
  13. J Vis. 2009 Apr 13;9(4):12.1-9 [PMID: 19757921]
  14. Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Jun 1;57(11):1301-9 [PMID: 15950002]
  15. Curr Biol. 2013 Mar 18;23(6):462-6 [PMID: 23453956]
  16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jun 1;88(11):4966-70 [PMID: 2052578]
  17. J Vis. 2013 Apr 12;13(5): [PMID: 23584630]
  18. Vision Res. 2012 Aug 1;66:17-25 [PMID: 22750053]
  19. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Feb 10;6:14 [PMID: 22363277]
  20. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jan;15(2):154-64 [PMID: 12429367]
  21. Vision Res. 2004 Mar;44(7):695-709 [PMID: 14751554]
  22. Neuron. 2008 Mar 27;57(6):827-33 [PMID: 18367084]
  23. Nature. 1978 Feb 23;271(5647):746-7 [PMID: 625341]
  24. Vision Res. 2013 Dec 18;93:1-9 [PMID: 24139921]
  25. Curr Biol. 1998 Jul 2;8(14):791-7 [PMID: 9663387]
  26. Brain Lang. 1980 Mar;9(2):182-98 [PMID: 7363063]
  27. Nature. 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):71-6 [PMID: 15343334]
  28. J Vis. 2009 Apr 17;9(4):14.1-18 [PMID: 19757923]
  29. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Aug;27(4):919-31 [PMID: 11518153]
  30. Vision Res. 2010 Apr 21;50(9):860-9 [PMID: 20156473]
  31. Vision Res. 2009 Oct;49(21):2566-73 [PMID: 19520103]
  32. Vision Res. 2009 Jul;49(14):1784-94 [PMID: 19383510]
  33. Trends Neurosci. 1997 Apr;20(4):147-52 [PMID: 9106353]
  34. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003 Apr;13(2):212-8 [PMID: 12744976]
  35. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Mar 4;100(5):2860-5 [PMID: 12604786]
  36. Curr Biol. 2012 May 8;22(9):814-9 [PMID: 22483940]
  37. Science. 1996 Jan 5;271(5245):77-81 [PMID: 8539603]
  38. Neuroimage. 2011 Aug 1;57(3):760-70 [PMID: 21146615]
  39. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34826 [PMID: 22485189]
  40. Vision Res. 2010 Jan;50(1):36-45 [PMID: 19819251]
  41. Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:427-52 [PMID: 21838545]
  42. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 10;109(28):11455-9 [PMID: 22665803]

MeSH Term

Child
China
Discrimination, Psychological
Dyslexia
Female
Humans
Male
Reading
Touch Perception
Visual Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0trainingvisualreadingchildrendyslexiaperceptualdiscriminationTDTgrouptexturesignificantlyperformanceChinesemeasuresprocessinglearningimprovesChinese-speakingprocessing/learningmighteighteentypicallydevelopedreaderstwonon-trainingresultsthresholdSOAsfluencyimprovementBACKGROUND:Highordercognitiveinteractlower-levelsensoryPreviousstudiesreportedenlargesspanconsequentlyspeedyoungoldpeopleamblyopiaRecentlystudyfoundthresholdscorrelatedcharacterrecognitionsuggestingdeficitspartlyunderpindifficultyMETHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALFINDINGS:clarifywhetherage-IQ-matchedcompletedseriestaskPriorsplitequivalentgroupstermsIQrevealedhighercontrolInterestinglydecreasedimportantlyexhibitedsignificantenhancementshowAdditionalfollow-uptestsshowedlong-lastingeffectmaintainedmonthsCONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE:suggestbasicabilityleastpartiallyrelyoverlappingmechanismsReadingenhanceddevelopmental

Similar Articles

Cited By