Measuring preparedness for mammography in women with intellectual disabilities: a validation study of the Mammography Preparedness Measure.

Claire Tienwey Wang, Nechama Greenwood, Laura F White, Joanne Wilkinson
Author Information
  1. Claire Tienwey Wang: Department of Family Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with intellectual disabilities have similar breast cancer rates as the general population, but lower rates of regular mammography and higher breast cancer mortality rates. Although prior qualitative work demonstrates that women with intellectual disabilities face unique, disability-specific barriers to mammography, the present authors lack standardized, validated instruments for measuring knowledge of breast cancer screening in this population. In addition, much research related to adults with intellectual disabilities focuses on family or carer perspectives, rather than involving women with intellectual disabilities, themselves.
METHODS: The present authors first pilot tested a general population instrument measuring breast cancer knowledge, and found that it did not perform adequately in women with intellectual disabilities. In response, the present authors developed the Mammography Preparedness Measure (MPM), a direct short interview tool to measure knowledge and preparedness in women with intellectual disabilities, themselves, rather than relying on caregiver or other reports, and using inclusive methodology. The present authors validated the MPM by assessing test-retest reliability.
RESULTS: Average test-retest per cent agreement of 84%, ranging from 74 to 91% agreement per item, with an overall kappa of 0.59.
CONCLUSION: The MPM appears to be a valid instrument appropriate for measuring mammography preparedness in women with intellectual disabilities. The success of this innovative tool suggests that direct, rather than informant-directed tools can be developed to measure health knowledge and cancer screening readiness in adults with intellectual disabilities, an important measure in studying and reducing disparities.

Keywords

References

  1. Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jan;34(1):546-53 [PMID: 23123867]
  2. Can Fam Physician. 2006 Nov;52(11):1410-8 [PMID: 17279198]
  3. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2006 Apr;10(2):106-16 [PMID: 16213787]
  4. Am J Health Promot. 2008 Jul-Aug;22(6):381-5 [PMID: 18677877]
  5. Nurs Inq. 2004 Mar;11(1):54-64 [PMID: 14962347]
  6. Lancet. 2001 May 26;357(9269):1685-91 [PMID: 11425392]
  7. Ann Fam Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):142-7 [PMID: 21403141]
  8. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2010 Aug;48(4):271-7 [PMID: 20722477]
  9. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1999 Jan;53(1):69-75 [PMID: 10206074]
  10. Ment Retard. 2006 Aug;44(4):249-59 [PMID: 16834462]
  11. Int J Health Serv. 1992;22(3):429-45 [PMID: 1644507]
  12. Soc Work Public Health. 2010 May;25(3):368-86 [PMID: 20446182]
  13. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2010 Sep;14(4):328-36 [PMID: 20493767]
  14. Epidemiol Rev. 2009;31:1-6 [PMID: 19822533]
  15. Prev Med. 2003 Nov;37(5):507-12 [PMID: 14572435]
  16. Disabil Rehabil. 1999 May-Jun;21(5-6):284-94 [PMID: 10381241]
  17. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10(3):173-82 [PMID: 16053595]
  18. Ment Retard. 2001 Aug;39(4):310-21 [PMID: 11448253]
  19. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Mar;57(3):268-78 [PMID: 22533629]
  20. J Nutr Health Aging. 2012;16(9):759-62 [PMID: 23131817]
  21. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2006;12(1):70-82 [PMID: 16435327]
  22. Ment Retard. 2001 Apr;39(2):130-41 [PMID: 11340962]
  23. J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Feb;19(2):184-94 [PMID: 15009798]
  24. J Am Board Fam Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;20(4):399-407 [PMID: 17615421]
  25. Soz Praventivmed. 2004;49(6):398-405 [PMID: 15669440]
  26. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2001 Jun;45(Pt 3):253-7 [PMID: 11422650]
  27. J Intellect Disabil. 2011 Sep;15(3):157-66 [PMID: 22123675]
  28. Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):2467-79 [PMID: 21840166]

Grants

  1. K07 CA134547/NCI NIH HHS
  2. 5K07 CA 1345547-04/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Breast Neoplasms
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Intellectual Disability
Mammography
Middle Aged
Patient Education as Topic
Pilot Projects
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0intellectualdisabilitieswomencancermammographybreastpresentauthorsknowledgeratespopulationmeasuringratherinstrumentMPMmeasurepreparednessgeneralvalidatedscreeningadultsdevelopedMammographyPreparednessMeasuredirecttooltest-retestperagreementtoolshealthdisparitiesvalidationBACKGROUND:WomensimilarlowerregularhighermortalityAlthoughpriorqualitativeworkdemonstratesfaceuniquedisability-specificbarrierslackstandardizedinstrumentsadditionmuchresearchrelatedfocusesfamilycarerperspectivesinvolvingthemselvesMETHODS:firstpilottestedfoundperformadequatelyresponseshortinterviewrelyingcaregiverreportsusinginclusivemethodologyassessingreliabilityRESULTS:Averagecent84%ranging7491%itemoverallkappa059CONCLUSION:appearsvalidappropriatesuccessinnovativesuggestsinformant-directedcanreadinessimportantstudyingreducingMeasuringdisabilities:studybehaviouralmeasurementdesigndisability

Similar Articles

Cited By