Restrictive blood transfusion protocol in liver resection patients reduces blood transfusions with no increase in patient morbidity.

John Wehry, Robert Cannon, Charles R Scoggins, Lisa Puffer, Kelly M McMasters, Robert C G Martin
Author Information
  1. John Wehry: Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, 315 E. Broadway #312, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
  2. Robert Cannon: Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, 315 E. Broadway #312, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
  3. Charles R Scoggins: Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, 315 E. Broadway #312, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
  4. Lisa Puffer: Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, 315 E. Broadway #312, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
  5. Kelly M McMasters: Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, 315 E. Broadway #312, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
  6. Robert C G Martin: Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, 315 E. Broadway #312, Louisville, KY 40202, USA. Electronic address: Robert.Martin@louisville.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Management of anemia in surgical oncology patients remains one of the key quality components in overall care and cost. Continued reports demonstrate the effects of hospital transfusion, which has been demonstrated to lead to a longer length of stay, more complications, and possibly worse overall oncologic outcomes. The hypothesis for this study was that a dedicated restrictive transfusion protocol in patients undergoing hepatectomy would lead to less overall blood transfusion with no increase in overall morbidity.
METHODS: A cohort study was performed using our prospective database from January 2000 to June 2013. September 2011 served as the separation point for the date of operation criteria because this marked the implementation of more restrictive blood transfusion guidelines.
RESULTS: A total of 186 patients undergoing liver resection were reviewed. The restrictive blood transfusion guidelines reduced the percentage of patients that received blood from 31.0% before January 9, 2011 to 23.3% after this date (P = .03). The liver procedure that was most consistently associated with higher levels of transfusion was a right lobectomy (16%). Prior surgery and endoscopic stent were the 2 preoperative interventions associated with receiving blood. Patients who received blood before and after the restrictive period had similar predictive factors: major hepatectomies, higher intraoperative blood loss, lower preoperative hemoglobin level, older age, prior systemic chemotherapy, and lower preoperative nutritional parameters (all P < .05). Patients who received blood did not have worse overall progression-free survival or overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: A restrictive blood transfusion protocol reduces the incidence of blood transfusions and the number of packed red blood cells transfused. Patients who require blood have similar preoperative and intraoperative factors that cannot be mitigated in oncology patients. Restrictive use of blood transfusions can reduce cost and does adversely affect patients undergoing liver resection.

Keywords

References

  1. Ann Surg. 2012 Aug;256(2):235-44 [PMID: 22791100]
  2. Blood. 2009 Apr 9;113(15):3406-17 [PMID: 19188662]
  3. Transfusion. 2008 Jul;48(7):1390-7 [PMID: 18466177]
  4. Oncology. 2005;69 Suppl 2:17-21 [PMID: 16244506]
  5. Transfusion. 2007 Aug;47(8):1468-80 [PMID: 17655591]
  6. Blood. 2008 Jan 1;111(1):25-41 [PMID: 17954703]
  7. Surgery. 2012 Sep;152(3):344-54 [PMID: 22938895]
  8. Oral Oncol. 2012 Apr;48(4):372-8 [PMID: 22182932]
  9. Ann Surg. 2009 Apr;249(4):617-23 [PMID: 19300227]
  10. HPB (Oxford). 2011 Feb;13(2):91-5 [PMID: 21241425]
  11. N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 1;361(14):1368-75 [PMID: 19797283]
  12. J Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;104(7):804-8 [PMID: 21792943]
  13. Oncology. 2005;68 Suppl 1:3-11 [PMID: 15855811]
  14. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Feb;21(2):473-8 [PMID: 24150192]
  15. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 May;210(5):627-34, 634-6 [PMID: 20421019]
  16. Ann Surg. 2012 Apr;255(4):708-14 [PMID: 22367442]
  17. HPB (Oxford). 2010 Feb;12(1):50-5 [PMID: 20495645]
  18. Surgery. 2012 Oct;152(4):567-73; discussion 573-4 [PMID: 22943842]
  19. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2006 Feb;18(1):60-6 [PMID: 16477921]
  20. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Sep;215(3):322-30 [PMID: 22726893]
  21. Transfusion. 2007 May;47(5):832-41 [PMID: 17465948]
  22. Ann Surg. 2009 Dec;250(6):914-21 [PMID: 19953711]
  23. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Apr;71(4):798-804 [PMID: 23265851]
  24. Anesthesiology. 2006 Jul;105(1):198-208 [PMID: 16810012]
  25. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Mar 1;19(5):1519-38 [PMID: 11230498]
  26. J Trauma. 2009 Dec;67(6):1439-42 [PMID: 20009700]
  27. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Aug;49(8):1116-30 [PMID: 16779711]
  28. HPB (Oxford). 2012 Feb;14(2):126-31 [PMID: 22221574]
  29. Ann Surg. 2010 Jul;252(1):11-7 [PMID: 20505504]
  30. Ann Surg. 2003 Jun;237(6):860-9; discussion 869-70 [PMID: 12796583]
  31. Acta Oncol. 2007;46(8):1123-30 [PMID: 17851860]
  32. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jan;18(1):166-73 [PMID: 21222043]
  33. Am J Surg. 2012 Dec;204(6):944-50; discussion 950-1 [PMID: 23022253]
  34. Blood Rev. 2007 Nov;21(6):327-48 [PMID: 17804128]
  35. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Mar;63(3):347-9 [PMID: 15742285]
  36. Transfus Med. 2004 Apr;14(2):123-44 [PMID: 15113377]
  37. HPB (Oxford). 2012 Apr;14(4):236-41 [PMID: 22404261]
  38. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;(1):CD005033 [PMID: 16437512]
  39. Am Surg. 2013 Jan;79(1):35-9 [PMID: 23317602]

Grants

  1. R25 CA134283/NCI NIH HHS
  2. R25-CA134283/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Anemia
Blood Transfusion
Clinical Protocols
Female
Hepatectomy
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bloodtransfusionpatientsoverallrestrictiveliverresectionpreoperativeprotocolundergoingreceivedPatientstransfusionsoncologycostleadworsestudyincreasemorbidityJanuary2011dateguidelinesassociatedhighersimilarintraoperativelowersurvivalreducesRestrictiveBACKGROUND:ManagementanemiasurgicalremainsonekeyqualitycomponentscareContinuedreportsdemonstrateeffectshospitaldemonstratedlongerlengthstaycomplicationspossiblyoncologicoutcomeshypothesisdedicatedhepatectomylessMETHODS:cohortperformedusingprospectivedatabase2000June2013SeptemberservedseparationpointoperationcriteriamarkedimplementationRESULTS:total186reviewedreducedpercentage310%9233%P=03procedureconsistentlylevelsrightlobectomy16%Priorsurgeryendoscopicstent2interventionsreceivingperiodpredictivefactors:majorhepatectomieslosshemoglobinlevelolderagepriorsystemicchemotherapynutritionalparametersP <05progression-freeCONCLUSIONS:incidencenumberpackedredcellstransfusedrequirefactorsmitigatedusecanreduceadverselyaffectpatientBloodComplicationsHepatectomyLiver

Similar Articles

Cited By