Screening and Counseling for Tobacco Use in Student Health Clinics: Reports of Health Care Providers.

Erin L Sutfin, Darden C Swords, Eun-Young Song, Beth A Reboussin, Donald Helme, Elizabeth Klein, Mark Wolfson
Author Information

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess tobacco screening and counseling in student health clinics, including facilitators, barriers, and associations with campus- and state-level variables.
DESIGN: We conducted a mixed-methods study with an online survey and qualitative interviews.
SETTING: Study setting was student health clinics on college campuses.
SUBJECTS: Subjects included 71 clinic directors or designees from 10 Southeastern states (quantitative survey) and 8 directors or designees from 4 Southeastern states (qualitative interviews).
MEASURES: Quantitative measures included demographics, screening and counseling practices, clinic-level supports for such practices, perceptions of tobacco on campus, institution size, public/private status, state tobacco farming revenue, and state tobacco control funding. Qualitative measures included barriers and facilitators of tobacco screening and counseling practices.
ANALYSIS: Logistic and linear regression models assessed correlates of screening and counseling. Qualitative data were analyzed using multistage interpretive thematic analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 55% of online survey respondents reported that their clinics screen for tobacco at every visit, whereas 80% reported their clinics offer counseling and pharmacotherapy. Barriers included lack of the following: time with patients, relevance to chief complaint, student self-identification as a tobacco user, access to pharmacotherapy, and interest in quitting among smokers. In multivariable models, more efforts to reduce tobacco use, student enrollment, and state-level cash receipts for tobacco were positively associated with clinic-level supports.
CONCLUSION: This study highlights missed opportunities for screening. Although reports of counseling were higher, providers identified many barriers.

Keywords

References

  1. Health Psychol. 2004 Mar;23(2):168-77 [PMID: 15008662]
  2. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Jul;12(7):724-33 [PMID: 20507899]
  3. Am J Public Health. 2007 Aug;97(8):1464-9 [PMID: 17600243]
  4. Health Econ. 2011 Mar;20(3):253-72 [PMID: 20069614]
  5. JAMA. 1998 Nov 18;280(19):1673-8 [PMID: 9831998]
  6. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Sep;27(3):714-22 [PMID: 22686965]
  7. Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Feb;70(2):187-92 [PMID: 18037601]
  8. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007 Feb;9(2):213-24 [PMID: 17365752]
  9. J Health Econ. 2003 Sep;22(5):843-59 [PMID: 12946462]
  10. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;(4):CD000165 [PMID: 15494989]
  11. J Am Coll Health. 2001 Mar;49(5):205-12 [PMID: 11337895]
  12. JAMA. 1988 Dec 9;260(22):3301-5 [PMID: 3054192]
  13. J Am Coll Health. 2012;60(1):66-73 [PMID: 22171731]
  14. Am J Public Health. 2008 Feb;98(2):304-9 [PMID: 18172148]
  15. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(2):CD000165 [PMID: 11405953]
  16. Acad Med. 1993 Feb;68(2):168-70 [PMID: 8431243]
  17. J Am Coll Health. 2007 May-Jun;55(6):351-9 [PMID: 17517547]
  18. Tob Control. 2000 Dec;9(4):382-8 [PMID: 11106707]
  19. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Feb;12(2):96-104 [PMID: 20018947]
  20. J Am Coll Health. 2001 May;49(6):249-52 [PMID: 11413942]
  21. Am J Public Health. 2005 Feb;95(2):338-44 [PMID: 15671473]
  22. Oncologist. 2012;17(3):455-62 [PMID: 22334454]
  23. Health Educ Res. 2012 Feb;27(1):141-50 [PMID: 22156071]
  24. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Jun;72(3):400-10 [PMID: 15279524]
  25. J Am Coll Health. 1999 Sep;48(2):55-60 [PMID: 10500367]
  26. Health Psychol. 2000 May;19(3):223-31 [PMID: 10868766]
  27. Am J Prev Med. 2009 Apr;36(4):333-6 [PMID: 19201148]

Grants

  1. R21 CA131749/NCI NIH HHS
  2. R21CA131749/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Counseling
Humans
Internet
Mass Screening
Smoking Cessation
Smoking Prevention
Southeastern United States
State Government
Student Health Services
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tobacco Use
Universities

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0tobaccocounselingscreeningstudentclinicsincludedTobaccoHealthbarrierssurveypracticeshealthfacilitatorsstate-levelstudyonlinequalitativeinterviewsStudycollegedirectorsdesigneesSoutheasternstatesmeasuresclinic-levelsupportsstatecontrolQualitativemodelsreportedpharmacotherapyScreeningCounselingStudentResearchTargetpopulationCessationPURPOSE:assessincludingassociationscampus-variablesDESIGN:conductedmixed-methodsSETTING:settingcampusesSUBJECTS:Subjects71clinic10quantitative84MEASURES:Quantitativedemographicsperceptionscampusinstitutionsizepublic/privatestatusfarmingrevenuefundingANALYSIS:LogisticlinearregressionassessedcorrelatesdataanalyzedusingmultistageinterpretivethematicanalysisRESULTS:total55%respondentsscreeneveryvisitwhereas80%offerBarrierslackfollowing:timepatientsrelevancechiefcomplaintself-identificationuseraccessinterestquittingamongsmokersmultivariableeffortsreduceuseenrollmentcashreceiptspositivelyassociatedCONCLUSION:highlightsmissedopportunitiesAlthoughreportshigherprovidersidentifiedmanyUseClinics:ReportsCareProvidersCollegefocus:smokingManuscriptformat:researchOutcomemeasure:behavioralPreventionpurpose:descriptiveSetting:clinical/healthcareStrategy:policychangedesign:mixed-methodage:studentsadultscircumstances:education

Similar Articles

Cited By