Outcomes of abdominal radical trachelectomy: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study in a Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit.

Hideki Tokunaga, Yoh Watanabe, Hitoshi Niikura, Satoru Nagase, Masafumi Toyoshima, Reiji Shiro, Yoshihito Yokoyama, Hideki Mizunuma, Tsuyoshi Ohta, Hiroshi Nishiyama, Takafumi Watanabe, Naoki Sato, Naoto Sato, Toru Sugiyama, Tadao Takano, Fumiaki Takahashi, Nobuo Yaegashi
Author Information
  1. Hideki Tokunaga: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate surgical, pregnancy, and prognostic outcomes of radical abdominal trachelectomy (RAT) for Japanese patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
METHODS: This was a multicenter prospective cohort study conducted in member facilities of Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit. Patients with FIGO 1A-1B1 squamous cell carcinoma were included.
RESULTS: A total of 42 patients were registered in this study, and all patients underwent planned RAT. The median stromal invasion and median horizontal spread of resected specimens were 4.6 (range 1.0-10.0) and 12.4 mm (range 3.0-28.0), respectively. The median surgical time and median blood loss were 304 min (range 233-611) and 848 mL (range 250-3984), respectively. Five patients (11.9 %) received blood transfusion. Five of 18 (27.8 %) patients who attempted to conceive achieved pregnancy, and 3 patients had healthy babies. However, all pregnancies required assisted reproductive technology with in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Four patients (9.5 %) received postoperative adjuvant therapy, and 3 patients (7.1 %) developed disease recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: RAT may be safely performed for Japanese patients with FIGO 1A-1B1 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix, even in educational medical facilities. However, less-invasive surgery should be considered more often to improve pregnancy outcomes.

References

  1. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Oct;131(1):77-82 [PMID: 23769758]
  2. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jan;132(1):254-9 [PMID: 24041877]
  3. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Sep;130(3):530-6 [PMID: 23811115]
  4. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Oct;115(1):51-5 [PMID: 19646742]
  5. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Jun 1;121(3):565-70 [PMID: 21334051]
  6. Int J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr;16(2):141-4 [PMID: 21086011]
  7. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Nov;111(2):261-4 [PMID: 18708244]
  8. Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Aug;94(2):528-32 [PMID: 15297199]
  9. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 Sep;22(7):1251-7 [PMID: 22914213]
  10. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Oct;131(1):83-6 [PMID: 23917083]
  11. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Feb;12(2):192-200 [PMID: 20619737]
  12. BJOG. 2012 Jan;119(2):187-93 [PMID: 22168762]
  13. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 Sep;22(7):1244-50 [PMID: 22864335]
  14. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Dec;127(3):484-8 [PMID: 22935472]
  15. Hum Reprod. 2013 Jul;28(7):1793-8 [PMID: 23624633]
  16. Br J Cancer. 2013 Nov 26;109(11):2778-82 [PMID: 24169350]

MeSH Term

Adult
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Female
Humans
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Trachelectomy
Treatment Outcome
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientsstudymedianrange%pregnancyRAT3surgicaloutcomesradicalabdominalJapanesemulticenterprospectivecohortfacilitiesTohokuGynecologicCancerUnitFIGO1A-1B1squamouscellcarcinoma410respectivelybloodFive9receivedHoweverBACKGROUND:aimedevaluateprognostictrachelectomyearly-stagecervicalcancerMETHODS:conductedmemberPatientsincludedRESULTS:total42registeredunderwentplannedstromalinvasionhorizontalspreadresectedspecimens60-1012mm0-28timeloss304min233-611848mL250-398411transfusion18278attemptedconceiveachievedhealthybabiespregnanciesrequiredassistedreproductivetechnologyin-vitrofertilizationembryotransferFour5postoperativeadjuvanttherapy7developeddiseaserecurrenceCONCLUSIONS:maysafelyperformedcervixeveneducationalmedicalless-invasivesurgeryconsideredoftenimproveOutcomestrachelectomy:results

Similar Articles

Cited By