Relational continuity of care in integrated maternity and child health clinics improve parents' service experiences.

Miia Tuominen, Anne Kaljonen, Pia Ahonen, Päivi Rautava
Author Information
  1. Miia Tuominen: Department of Clinical Medicine, Public Health, University of Turku.
  2. Anne Kaljonen: Institute for Child and Youth Research, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  3. Pia Ahonen: Education and Research.
  4. Päivi Rautava: Department of Clinical Medicine, Public Health, University of Turku.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In the Finnish primary health care, relational continuity of care is implemented in integrated maternity and child health clinics where the same nurse takes care of the family from the pregnancy until the child reaches school age. The aim of this study was to clarify the association between this relational continuity of care and the availability, utilisation and selected features of the maternity and child health clinic services, as evaluated by the parents.
METHODS: A comparative, cross-sectional service evaluation survey was used. Eighteen months after their baby's delivery, mothers (N = 987) and fathers (N = 835) from Southwest Finland evaluated specific maternity and child health clinic services. Comparisons were made between the parents who had relational continuity of care in the integrated maternity and child health clinics and those who did not.
RESULTS: Home visits were more frequently provided when relational continuity of care in integrated maternity and child health clinics existed. Parents who had this relational continuity of care, evaluated several features of the service, especially provided support, more positively than parents who did not.
CONCLUSIONS: Relational continuity of care in integrated maternity and child health clinics seems to increase parents' satisfaction with the services and might increase the provision of home visits.

Keywords

References

  1. Scand J Caring Sci. 2013 Dec;27(4):927-34 [PMID: 23170804]
  2. Women Birth. 2012 Mar;25(1):39-46 [PMID: 21324768]
  3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Sep 14;12:96 [PMID: 22974077]
  4. JAMA. 2006 Dec 20;296(23):2848-51 [PMID: 17179462]
  5. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2012;7:null [PMID: 22783367]
  6. Public Health Nurs. 2003 Jul-Aug;20(4):328-38 [PMID: 12823793]
  7. Birth. 2006 Jun;33(2):123-30 [PMID: 16732777]
  8. Ann Fam Med. 2003 Sep-Oct;1(3):149-55 [PMID: 15043376]
  9. J Fam Pract. 2004 Dec;53(12):974-80 [PMID: 15581440]
  10. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2009 Oct;16(8):716-24 [PMID: 19744061]
  11. Ann Fam Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;2(5):445-51 [PMID: 15506579]
  12. Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(2):212-5 [PMID: 17454926]
  13. Am J Med Qual. 2008 Jul-Aug;23(4):302-10 [PMID: 18487421]
  14. Scand J Caring Sci. 2006 Mar;20(1):79-85 [PMID: 16489963]
  15. Midwifery. 2012 Aug;28(4):362-71 [PMID: 21820778]
  16. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2003 Mar-Apr;48(2):119-25 [PMID: 12686944]
  17. J Adv Nurs. 2003 Mar;41(6):595-606 [PMID: 12622868]
  18. Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Oct;42(5):1273-84 [PMID: 23143610]
  19. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2004 Jan-Feb;38(1-2):56-64 [PMID: 14731195]
  20. Scand J Caring Sci. 2014 Jun;28(2):225-34 [PMID: 23488476]
  21. BMJ. 2003 Nov 22;327(7425):1219-21 [PMID: 14630762]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthcarechildcontinuitymaternityrelationalintegratedclinicsservicesstudyevaluatedparentsservicefeaturescliniccomparativeN=notvisitsprovidedRelationalincreaseparents'INTRODUCTION:FinnishprimaryimplementednursetakesfamilypregnancyreachesschoolageaimclarifyassociationavailabilityutilisationselectedMETHODS:cross-sectionalevaluationsurveyusedEighteenmonthsbaby'sdeliverymothers987fathers835SouthwestFinlandspecificComparisonsmadeRESULTS:HomefrequentlyexistedParentsseveralespeciallysupportpositivelyCONCLUSIONS:seemssatisfactionmightprovisionhomeimproveexperiencesSTEPSpatientmaternal

Similar Articles

Cited By