BILATERAL AND BIMODAL BENEFITS AS A FUNCTION OF AGE FOR ADULTS FITTED WITH A COCHLEAR IMPLANT.

Michael Dorman, Anthony Spahr, Rene H Gifford, Sarah Cook, Ting Zhanga, Louise Loiselle, JoAnne Whittingham, David Schramm
Author Information
  1. Michael Dorman: Arizona State University.
  2. Anthony Spahr: Arizona State University.
  3. Rene H Gifford: Vanderbilt University.
  4. Sarah Cook: Arizona State University.
  5. Ting Zhanga: Arizona State University.
  6. Louise Loiselle: Arizona State University.
  7. JoAnne Whittingham: University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine.
  8. David Schramm: University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) and bimodal (electric plus contralateral acoustic) stimulation can provide better speech intelligibility than a single CI. In both cases patients need to combine information from two ears into a single percept. In this paper we ask whether the physiological and psychological processes associated with aging alter the ability of bilateral and bimodal CI patients to combine information across two ears in the service of speech understanding.
MATERIALS: The subjects were 61 adult, bilateral CI patients and 94 adult, bimodal patients. The test battery was composed of monosyllabic words presented in quiet and the AzBio sentences presented in quiet, at +10 and at +5 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
METHODS: The subjects were tested in standard audiometric sound booths. Speech and noise were always presented from a single speaker directly in front of the listener.
RESULTS: Age and bilateral or bimodal benefit were not significantly correlated for any test measure.
CONCLUSIONS: Other factors being equal, both bilateral CIs and bimodal CIs can be recommended for elderly patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Audiol. 2003 Jul;42 Suppl 1:S59-67 [PMID: 12918611]
  2. Ear Hear. 2004 Feb;25(1):9-21 [PMID: 14770014]
  3. Int J Audiol. 2010 Dec;49(12):912-9 [PMID: 20874053]
  4. Ear Hear. 2008 Jan;29(1):20-32 [PMID: 18091099]
  5. Ear Hear. 2012 Jan-Feb;33(1):112-7 [PMID: 21829134]
  6. J Speech Hear Disord. 1962 Feb;27:62-70 [PMID: 14485785]
  7. Ear Hear. 2009 Aug;30(4):419-31 [PMID: 19455039]

Grants

  1. R01 DC010821/NIDCD NIH HHS
  2. F31 DC011684/NIDCD NIH HHS
  3. R01 DC009404/NIDCD NIH HHS
  4. F32 DC010937/NIDCD NIH HHS
  5. R03 DC011052/NIDCD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bilateralbimodalpatientsCIssingleCIpresentedcochlearcanspeechcombineinformationtwoearssubjectsadulttestquietBACKGROUND:implantselectricpluscontralateralacousticstimulationprovidebetterintelligibilitycasesneedperceptpaperaskwhetherphysiologicalpsychologicalprocessesassociatedagingalterabilityacrossserviceunderstandingMATERIALS:6194batterycomposedmonosyllabicwordsAzBiosentences+10+5dBsignal-to-noiseratioSNRMETHODS:testedstandardaudiometricsoundboothsSpeechnoisealwaysspeakerdirectlyfrontlistenerRESULTS:AgebenefitsignificantlycorrelatedmeasureCONCLUSIONS:factorsequalrecommendedelderlyBILATERALANDBIMODALBENEFITSASFUNCTIONOFAGEFORADULTSFITTEDWITHCOCHLEARIMPLANTimplantpresbycusis

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)