A review of state regulations to promote infant physical activity in child care.

Meghan M Slining, Sara E Benjamin Neelon, Kiyah J Duffey
Author Information
  1. Meghan M Slining: Department of Health Sciences, Furman University, 3300 Poinsett Highway, Greenville, SC, 29613, USA. meghan.slining@furman.edu.
  2. Sara E Benjamin Neelon: Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. sara.benjamin@duke.edu.
  3. Kiyah J Duffey: Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA. kduffey@vt.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to review state regulations promoting increased physical activity and decreased sedentary behaviors in infants in child care and to assess consistency with recent Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations.
METHODS: We compared existing state and territory licensing and administrative regulations to recent IOM recommendations to promote physical activity and decrease sedentary time in very young children attending out-of-home child care (both child care centers and family child care homes). Three independent reviewers searched two sources (a publicly available website and WestlawNext™) and compared regulations with five IOM recommendations: 1) providing daily opportunities for infants to move, 2) engaging with infants on the ground, 3) providing daily tummy time for infants less than six months of age, 4) using cribs, car seats and high chairs for their primary purpose, and 5) limiting the use of restrictive equipment for holding infants while they are awake. We used Pearson chi-square tests to assess associations between geographic region, year of last update, and number of state regulations consistent with the IOM recommendations.
RESULTS: The mean (SD) number of regulations for states was 1.9 (1.3) for centers and 1.6 (1.2) for homes out of a possible 5.0. Two states had regulations for all five recommendations, Arizona for centers and Virginia for homes. Six states and territories had zero regulations for child care centers and seven states and territories had zero regulations for family child care homes. There were no significant associations between geographic region and number of regulations consistent with IOM recommendations.
CONCLUSIONS: Out-of-home child care settings are important targets for optimal early child health interventions. While most states had some regulations related to the promotion of physical activity among infants, few states had regulations for more than three of the five IOM recommendations. Enhancing state regulations in child care facilities could aid in early childhood obesity prevention efforts.

References

  1. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Sep;111(9):1343-62 [PMID: 21872698]
  2. JAMA. 2014 Feb 26;311(8):806-14 [PMID: 24570244]
  3. Am J Occup Ther. 2002 Sep-Oct;56(5):577-80 [PMID: 12269513]
  4. J Pediatr. 2005 Jun;146(6):732-7 [PMID: 15973308]
  5. Am J Hum Biol. 2001 May-Jun;13(3):384-9 [PMID: 11460904]
  6. Adv Nutr. 2012 Jan;3(1):56-7 [PMID: 22332102]
  7. J Phys Act Health. 2010 Mar;7 Suppl 1:S108-19 [PMID: 20440004]
  8. Matern Child Health J. 2012 Jul;16(5):1015-20 [PMID: 21643834]
  9. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2011 Nov;23(4):600-15 [PMID: 22109783]
  10. Child Dev. 1993 Aug;64(4):1005-21 [PMID: 8404253]
  11. J Pediatr. 2010 Jul;157(1):20-25.e1 [PMID: 20227724]
  12. Pediatrics. 2009 Aug;124(2):555-62 [PMID: 19651579]
  13. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1996 Sep;20(9):848-53 [PMID: 8880353]
  14. Soz Praventivmed. 2003;48(3):161-7 [PMID: 12891867]
  15. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009 Jan;6(1):A11 [PMID: 19080017]
  16. J Bone Miner Res. 2003 May;18(5):885-92 [PMID: 12733728]
  17. J Pediatr. 1995 Mar;126(3):353-7 [PMID: 7869191]
  18. N Engl J Med. 1992 Nov 5;327(19):1350-5 [PMID: 1406836]
  19. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 May 11;7:40 [PMID: 20459784]
  20. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jun;44(6):651-8 [PMID: 23683983]
  21. BMC Public Health. 2008 May 30;8:188 [PMID: 18513424]
  22. Hum Mov Sci. 2008 Oct;27(5):668-81 [PMID: 18242747]
  23. Infant Behav Dev. 2012 Jun;35(3):329-34 [PMID: 22721733]

Grants

  1. R21 HD070822/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Child Day Care Centers
Cross-Sectional Studies
Health Promotion
Humans
Infant
Infant Care
Motor Activity
National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division
Pediatric Obesity
United States

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0regulationschildcareinfantsIOMrecommendationsstatesstate1physicalactivitycentershomesfivenumberpurposereviewsedentaryassessrecentcomparedpromotetimefamilyprovidingdaily235associationsgeographicregionconsistentterritorieszeroearlyBACKGROUND:studypromotingincreaseddecreasedbehaviorsconsistencyInstituteMedicineMETHODS:existingterritorylicensingadministrativedecreaseyoungchildrenattendingout-of-homeThreeindependentreviewerssearchedtwosourcespubliclyavailablewebsiteWestlawNext™recommendations:opportunitiesmoveengaginggroundtummylesssixmonthsage4usingcribscarseatshighchairsprimarylimitinguserestrictiveequipmentholdingawakeusedPearsonchi-squaretestsyearlastupdateRESULTS:meanSD96possible0TwoArizonaVirginiaSixsevensignificantCONCLUSIONS:Out-of-homesettingsimportanttargetsoptimalhealthinterventionsrelatedpromotionamongthreeEnhancingfacilitiesaidchildhoodobesitypreventioneffortsinfant

Similar Articles

Cited By