Sex differences in flexibility-arterial stiffness relationship and its application for diagnosis of arterial stiffening: a cross-sectional observational study.

Masato Nishiwaki, Kazumichi Kurobe, Atsushi Kiuchi, Tomohiro Nakamura, Naoyuki Matsumoto
Author Information
  1. Masato Nishiwaki: Faculty of Engineering, Osaka Institute of Technology, Osaka, Japan.
  2. Kazumichi Kurobe: Faculty of Business, Sports Management Course, Hannan University, Osaka, Japan.
  3. Atsushi Kiuchi: Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
  4. Tomohiro Nakamura: Faculty of Engineering, Osaka Institute of Technology, Osaka, Japan.
  5. Naoyuki Matsumoto: Faculty of Environmental Symbiotic Sciences, Prefectural University of Kumamoto, Kumamoto, Japan.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Arterial stiffness might be related to trunk flexibility in middle-aged and older participants, but it is also affected by age, sex, and blood pressure. This cross-sectional observational study investigated whether trunk flexibility is related to arterial stiffness after considering the major confounding factors of age, sex, and blood pressure. We further investigated whether a simple diagnostic test of flexibility could be helpful to screen for increased arterial stiffening.
METHODS: According to age and sex, we assigned 1150 adults (male, n = 536; female, n = 614; age, 18-89 y) to groups with either high- or poor-flexibility based on the sit-and-reach test. Arterial stiffness was assessed by cardio-ankle vascular index.
RESULTS: In all categories of men and in older women, arterial stiffness was higher in poor-flexibility than in high-flexibility (P<0.05). This difference remained significant after normalizing arterial stiffness for confounding factors such as blood pressure, but it was not found among young and middle-aged women. Stepwise multiple-regression analysis also supported the notion of the sex differences in flexibility-arterial stiffness relationship. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that cut-off values for sit-and-reach among men and women were 33.2 (area under the curve [AUC], 0.711; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.666-0.756; sensitivity, 61.7%; specificity, 69.7%) and 39.2 (AUC, 0.639; 95% CI, 0.592-0.686; sensitivity, 61.1%; specificity, 62.0%) cm, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that flexibility-arterial stiffness relationship is not affected by BP, which is a major confounding factor. In addition, sex differences are observed in this relationship; poor trunk flexibility increases arterial stiffness in young, middle-aged, and older men, whereas the relationship in women is found only in the elderly. Also, the sit-and-reach test can offer a simple method of predicting arterial stiffness at home or elsewhere.

References

  1. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008 Apr;15(2):149-55 [PMID: 18391640]
  2. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2006 Apr;13(2):101-7 [PMID: 16733298]
  3. Circ J. 2007 Nov;71(11):1710-4 [PMID: 17965489]
  4. Ann Epidemiol. 2006 Jul;16(7):554-62 [PMID: 16406245]
  5. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2013;20(4):391-400 [PMID: 23268984]
  6. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95 [PMID: 12900694]
  7. Circulation. 2005 Feb 8;111(5):697-716 [PMID: 15699287]
  8. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Sep;86(9):4139-46 [PMID: 11549640]
  9. Hypertension. 2010 Jun;55(6):e24-5 [PMID: 20385964]
  10. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014 Jan;114(1):49-57 [PMID: 24141936]
  11. Hypertens Res. 2002 May;25(3):359-64 [PMID: 12135313]
  12. Hypertens Res. 2013 Apr;36(4):334-41 [PMID: 23324866]
  13. JAMA. 1991 Apr 10;265(14):1861-7 [PMID: 2005736]
  14. Atherosclerosis. 2003 Feb;166(2):303-9 [PMID: 12535743]
  15. Integr Blood Press Control. 2013 Apr 30;6:27-38 [PMID: 23667317]
  16. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2011;18(11):924-38 [PMID: 21628839]
  17. Cardiovasc Res. 2003 Mar;57(3):861-8 [PMID: 12618248]
  18. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009 Oct;297(4):H1314-8 [PMID: 19666849]
  19. Hypertension. 2010 Jan;55(1):33-9 [PMID: 19996070]
  20. BMJ. 2009 Dec 10;339:b5262 [PMID: 20008378]
  21. Hypertension. 2006 Oct;48(4):602-8 [PMID: 16940223]
  22. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Mar;45(3):542-52 [PMID: 22968306]
  23. Trials. 2013 Jun 22;14:187 [PMID: 23799886]
  24. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 02;9(1):e83977 [PMID: 24392103]
  25. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998 Jan;18(1):127-32 [PMID: 9445266]
  26. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2011 Aug 10;11:51 [PMID: 21831311]
  27. J Hypertens. 2009 Oct;27(10):2022-7 [PMID: 19550355]
  28. Circulation. 2000 Sep 12;102(11):1270-5 [PMID: 10982542]
  29. Exp Physiol. 2006 Mar;91(2):465-72 [PMID: 16407473]
  30. J Hum Hypertens. 2005 May;19(5):401-6 [PMID: 15729378]
  31. Hypertension. 2007 Jun;49(6):1202-6 [PMID: 17452508]
  32. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:649836 [PMID: 23781266]
  33. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993 Jan;13(1):90-7 [PMID: 8422344]
  34. Hypertension. 2010 Mar;55(3):799-805 [PMID: 20065155]
  35. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Apr;112(4):1261-8 [PMID: 21833487]
  36. Circulation. 1985 Feb;71(2):202-10 [PMID: 3965165]
  37. Hypertension. 1999 May;33(5):1111-7 [PMID: 10334796]
  38. FASEB J. 1996 Apr;10(5):615-24 [PMID: 8621060]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arteries
Blood Pressure
Cardiovascular Diseases
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Sex Factors
Vascular Stiffness
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0stiffnessarterialsexrelationshipflexibilityagewomen0trunkmiddle-agedolderbloodpressureconfoundingtestsit-and-reachmendifferencesflexibility-arterialArterialrelatedalsoaffectedcross-sectionalobservationalstudyinvestigatedwhethermajorfactorssimplepoor-flexibilityfoundamongyounganalysiscurve295%sensitivity617%specificityPURPOSE:mightparticipantsconsideringdiagnostichelpfulscreenincreasedstiffeningMETHODS:Accordingassigned1150adultsmalen = 536femalen = 61418-89ygroupseitherhigh-basedassessedcardio-anklevascularindexRESULTS:categorieshigherhigh-flexibilityP<005differenceremainedsignificantnormalizingStepwisemultiple-regressionsupportednotionReceiveroperatingcharacteristicrevealedcut-offvalues33area[AUC]711confidenceinterval[CI]666-07566939AUC639CI592-06861%620%cmrespectivelyCONCLUSION:resultsindicateBPfactoradditionobservedpoorincreaseswhereaselderlyAlsocanoffermethodpredictinghomeelsewhereSexapplicationdiagnosisstiffening:

Similar Articles

Cited By