Human papillomavirus testing 2007-2012: co-testing and triage utilization and impact on subsequent clinical management.

Jack Cuzick, Orrin Myers, William C Hunt, Debbie Saslow, Philip E Castle, Walter Kinney, Alan Waxman, Michael Robertson, Cosette M Wheeler, New Mexico HPV Pap Registry Steering Committee
Author Information
  1. Jack Cuzick: Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Abstract

In the United States, high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is recommended for women with atypical squamous cells of unknown significance (ASC-US) cytology, and co-testing with cytology and HPV is a recommended option for screening women aged ≥ 30 years. No population-based data are available to examine utilization of HPV testing in the United States. Using the New Mexico HPV Pap Registry data resource, we describe population trends (2007-2012) in utilization and positivity rates for HPV testing as a routine co-testing screening procedure and for triage of ASC-US and other cytologic outcomes. For women aged 30-65 years co-testing increased from 5.2% in 2007 to 19.1% in 2012 (p < 0.001). Overall 82% of women with ASC-US cytology who did not receive co-testing also had an HPV test. HPV positivity was age and cytology result dependent but did not show time trends. For women with negative cytology, 64% received an additional screening test within 3 years if no co-test was done or if it was positive, but this was reduced to 47% with a negative co-test. Reflex HPV testing for ASC-US cytology is well established and occurs in most women. Evidence for reflex testing is also observed following other abnormal cytology outcomes. Co-testing in women aged 30-65 years has more than tripled from 2007 to 2012, but was still only used in 19.1% of women aged 30-65 years attending for screening in 2012. Women receiving co-testing had longer repeat screening intervals, but rescreening within 3 years is still very common even with co-testing.

Keywords

References

  1. Prev Med. 2013 Nov;57(5):419-25 [PMID: 23628517]
  2. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2010 Jan;14(1):73-80 [PMID: 20043357]
  3. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jul;116(1):76-84 [PMID: 20567171]
  4. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Aug;118(2 Pt 1):289-95 [PMID: 21775844]
  5. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;206(1):46.e1-46.e11 [PMID: 21944226]
  6. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012 Apr;137(4):516-42 [PMID: 22431528]
  7. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jun 19;156(12):880-91, W312 [PMID: 22711081]
  8. JAMA. 2002 Apr 24;287(16):2120-9 [PMID: 11966387]
  9. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002 Nov-Dec;52(6):342-62 [PMID: 12469763]
  10. Am Fam Physician. 2003 Apr 15;67(8):1759-66 [PMID: 12725455]
  11. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;102(2):417-27 [PMID: 12907124]
  12. Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Apr 1;159(7):702-6 [PMID: 15033648]
  13. Br J Cancer. 2006 Jul 3;95(1):56-61 [PMID: 16773068]
  14. Eur J Cancer. 2007 Feb;43(3):476-80 [PMID: 17223540]
  15. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;197(4):346-55 [PMID: 17904957]
  16. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;120(5):1222-38 [PMID: 23090560]
  17. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;114(6):1409-20 [PMID: 20134296]
  18. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013 Apr;17(5 Suppl 1):S1-S27 [PMID: 23519301]
  19. Int J Cancer. 2013 Feb 15;132(4):959-66 [PMID: 22806936]
  20. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 May;23(5):765-73 [PMID: 24302677]

Grants

  1. P30 CA118100/NCI NIH HHS
  2. U19 AI084081/NIAID NIH HHS
  3. U54CA164336/NCI NIH HHS
  4. U19AI084081/NIAID NIH HHS
  5. U19 AI113187/NIAID NIH HHS
  6. U54 CA164336/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Female
Humans
Mass Screening
Middle Aged
New Mexico
Papillomaviridae
Papillomavirus Infections
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Primary Health Care
Registries
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Vaginal Smears
Young Adult
Uterine Cervical Dysplasia

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0HPVwomenco-testingtestingcytologyscreeningyearsASC-USagedutilizationUnitedStatesNewMexico30-652012high-riskpapillomavirusrecommendeddataPapRegistrytrendspositivitytriageoutcomes2007191%alsotestnegativewithin3co-teststillhumanatypicalsquamouscellsunknownsignificanceoption30population-basedavailableexamineUsingresourcedescribepopulation2007-2012ratesroutineprocedurecytologicincreased52%p<0001Overall82%receiveageresultdependentshowtime64%receivedadditionaldonepositivereduced47%ReflexwellestablishedoccursEvidencereflexobservedfollowingabnormalCo-testingtripledusedattendingWomenreceivinglongerrepeatintervalsrescreeningcommonevenHuman2007-2012:impactsubsequentclinicalmanagementcervicalcoverageoutcome

Similar Articles

Cited By (21)