A school-based intervention improves physical fitness in Ecuadorian adolescents: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Susana Andrade, Carl Lachat, Angelica Ochoa-Aviles, Roosmarijn Verstraeten, Lieven Huybregts, Dominique Roberfroid, Diana Andrade, John Van Camp, Rosendo Rojas, Silvana Donoso, Greet Cardon, Patrick Kolsteren
Author Information

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective lifestyle interventions are needed to prevent noncommunicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries. We analyzed the effects of a school-based health promotion intervention on physical fitness after 28 months and explored if the effect varied with important school characteristics. We also assessed effects on screen time, physical activity and BMI.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a cluster-randomized pair matched trial in schools in urban Ecuador. The intervention included an individual and environmental component tailored to the local context and resources. Primary outcomes were physical fitness (EUROFIT battery), screen time (questionnaires) and physical activity (accelerometers). Change in BMI was a secondary outcome. A total of 1440 grade 8 and 9 adolescents (intervention: n = 700, 48.6%) and 20 schools (intervention: n = 10, 50%) participated. Data of 1083 adolescents (intervention: n = 550, 50.8%) from 20 schools were analyzed.
CONCLUSIONS: A school-based intervention with an individual and environment component can improve physical fitness and can minimize the decline in physical activity levels from childhood into adolescence in urban Ecuador.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01004367.

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT01004367

References

  1. Am J Public Health. 1998 Jun;88(6):949-51 [PMID: 9618627]
  2. Public Health Nutr. 2007 May;10(5):477-84 [PMID: 17411468]
  3. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Jul;24(7):1810-7 [PMID: 20555277]
  4. J Sci Med Sport. 2011 Sep;14(5):417-23 [PMID: 21620767]
  5. BMJ. 2012;345:e5888 [PMID: 23044984]
  6. Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):219-29 [PMID: 22818936]
  7. Lancet. 2010 Nov 20;376(9754):1775-84 [PMID: 21074255]
  8. J Public Health (Oxf). 2008 Jun;30(2):153-60 [PMID: 18375469]
  9. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Nov;72(5 Suppl):1307S-1315S [PMID: 11063473]
  10. Prev Med. 1992 Jan;21(1):53-62 [PMID: 1738768]
  11. Health Psychol. 2008 May;27(3):379-87 [PMID: 18624603]
  12. Int J Sports Med. 2001 May;22(4):295-300 [PMID: 11414674]
  13. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jan;44(1):48-55 [PMID: 23253649]
  14. Am J Hum Biol. 2003 Nov-Dec;15(6):800-13 [PMID: 14595872]
  15. Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Apr;28(2):319-26 [PMID: 10342698]
  16. Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):247-57 [PMID: 22818937]
  17. BMJ. 2012;345:e5661 [PMID: 22951546]
  18. Pediatr Obes. 2012 Aug;7(4):274-83 [PMID: 22715112]
  19. Rev Med Chil. 2008 Jan;136(1):22-30 [PMID: 18483650]
  20. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:106 [PMID: 24745348]
  21. BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60 [PMID: 12958120]
  22. J R Soc Promot Health. 2004 Jan;124(1):29-33 [PMID: 14971190]
  23. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:98 [PMID: 21936895]
  24. Pediatr Obes. 2012 Jun;7(3):196-204 [PMID: 22434783]
  25. Am J Public Health. 2013 Jul;103(7):e23-38 [PMID: 23678914]
  26. JAMA. 2009 May 20;301(19):2024-35 [PMID: 19454641]
  27. Obes Res. 2003 Mar;11(3):434-41 [PMID: 12634442]
  28. Health Educ Res. 2006 Dec;21(6):911-21 [PMID: 17032704]
  29. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2:CD007651 [PMID: 23450577]
  30. J Phys Act Health. 2015 Mar;12(3):340-8 [PMID: 24956609]
  31. J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Dec;23(9):2718-31 [PMID: 19910803]
  32. Br J Sports Med. 2012 Jun;46(8):595-602 [PMID: 22144006]
  33. Obes Rev. 2012 Mar;13(3):214-33 [PMID: 22070186]
  34. Br J Sports Med. 2011 Sep;45(11):871-6 [PMID: 21791456]
  35. J Pediatr. 1998 May;132(5):840-8 [PMID: 9602197]
  36. PLoS Genet. 2008 Mar;4(3):e1000037 [PMID: 18369456]
  37. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 May 11;7:40 [PMID: 20459784]
  38. Am J Prev Med. 2003 Apr;24(3):209-17 [PMID: 12657338]
  39. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Jan;32(1):1-11 [PMID: 18043605]
  40. Prev Med. 1991 Nov;20(6):685-99 [PMID: 1766941]
  41. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Apr;153(4):409-18 [PMID: 10201726]
  42. PLoS Med. 2013;10(6):e1001465 [PMID: 23776415]
  43. Arch Latinoam Nutr. 2008 Sep;58(3):265-73 [PMID: 19137989]
  44. Sports Med. 2012 Jun 1;42(6):449-58 [PMID: 22559317]
  45. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Jun;161(6):565-71 [PMID: 17548761]
  46. Lancet. 2012 Apr 28;379(9826):1641-52 [PMID: 22538179]
  47. BMJ. 2007 Jul 28;335(7612):194 [PMID: 17591624]
  48. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jul;43(7):1360-8 [PMID: 21131873]
  49. Hum Biol. 2007 Feb;79(1):51-77 [PMID: 17985656]
  50. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Aug;96(2):415-38 [PMID: 22760565]
  51. Lancet. 2007 Dec 8;370(9603):1929-38 [PMID: 18063029]
  52. Br J Sports Med. 2011 Sep;45(11):923-30 [PMID: 21836176]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Body Mass Index
Child
Diet
Ecuador
Female
Health Promotion
Humans
Life Style
Male
Motor Activity
Physical Fitness
School Health Services
Schools
Sedentary Behavior
Socioeconomic Factors
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0physicalinterventionfitnessschool-basedactivityschoolsintervention:n=analyzedeffectsscreentimeBMIcluster-randomizedtrialurbanEcuadorindividualcomponentadolescents20canBACKGROUND:Effectivelifestyleinterventionsneededpreventnoncommunicablediseaseslow-middle-incomecountrieshealthpromotion28monthsexploredeffectvariedimportantschoolcharacteristicsalsoassessedMETHODSANDRESULTS:performedpairmatchedincludedenvironmentaltailoredlocalcontextresourcesPrimaryoutcomesEUROFITbatteryquestionnairesaccelerometersChangesecondaryoutcometotal1440grade89700486%1050%participatedData1083550508%CONCLUSIONS:environmentimproveminimizedeclinelevelschildhoodadolescenceTRIALREGISTRATION:ClinicaltrialsgovidentifierNCT01004367improvesEcuadorianadolescents:controlled

Similar Articles

Cited By