Religion and morality.

Ryan McKay, Harvey Whitehouse
Author Information
  1. Ryan McKay: ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders.
  2. Harvey Whitehouse: Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology, School of Anthropology, University of Oxford.

Abstract

The relationship between religion and morality has long been hotly debated. Does religion make us more moral? Is it necessary for morality? Do moral inclinations emerge independently of religious intuitions? These debates, which nowadays rumble on in scientific journals as well as in public life, have frequently been marred by a series of conceptual confusions and limitations. Many scientific investigations have failed to decompose "religion" and "morality" into theoretically grounded elements; have adopted parochial conceptions of key concepts-in particular, sanitized conceptions of "prosocial" behavior; and have neglected to consider the complex interplay between cognition and culture. We argue that to make progress, the categories "religion" and "morality" must be fractionated into a set of biologically and psychologically cogent traits, revealing the cognitive foundations that shape and constrain relevant cultural variants. We adopt this fractionating strategy, setting out an encompassing evolutionary framework within which to situate and evaluate relevant evidence. Our goals are twofold: to produce a detailed picture of the current state of the field, and to provide a road map for future research on the relationship between religion and morality.

References

  1. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Nov;142(4):1074-83 [PMID: 23067062]
  2. Psychol Sci. 2009 Feb;20(2):224-30 [PMID: 19170938]
  3. Biol Lett. 2006 Sep 22;2(3):412-4 [PMID: 17148417]
  4. Psychol Sci. 2010 Mar;21(3):311-4 [PMID: 20424061]
  5. Child Dev. 2008 Mar-Apr;79(2):395-410 [PMID: 18366430]
  6. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 03;9(7):e99447 [PMID: 24992091]
  7. Cogn Psychol. 2001 May;42(3):217-66 [PMID: 11305883]
  8. Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):61-83; discussion 83-135 [PMID: 20550733]
  9. Conscious Cogn. 2013 Sep;22(3):1041-6 [PMID: 23933505]
  10. Psychol Bull. 2012 Sep;138(5):876-906 [PMID: 22925142]
  11. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Dec 22;279(1749):4923-8 [PMID: 23075842]
  12. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42366 [PMID: 22927928]
  13. Psychol Sci. 2012 Jun;23(6):635-42 [PMID: 22555969]
  14. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jan;4(1):29-34 [PMID: 10637620]
  15. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(1):47-66 [PMID: 16430328]
  16. Rev Econ Stat. 2016 Oct;98(4):617-637 [PMID: 30853721]
  17. Psychol Sci. 2004 May;15(5):295-301 [PMID: 15102137]
  18. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Apr;37(4):543-56 [PMID: 21343437]
  19. Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 22;278(1713):1858-63 [PMID: 21106588]
  20. Nature. 2013 Aug 8;500(7461):203-6 [PMID: 23851393]
  21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 12;108(28):11710-4 [PMID: 21709272]
  22. Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;18(3):204-7 [PMID: 17444911]
  23. Science. 2009 Jun 5;324(5932):1293-8 [PMID: 19498163]
  24. Cognition. 2013 Oct;129(1):163-79 [PMID: 23891826]
  25. PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e4040 [PMID: 19107208]
  26. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Jan;102(1):4-21 [PMID: 22023712]
  27. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Apr;17(4):166-71 [PMID: 23518159]
  28. Emotion. 2010 Dec;10(6):855-62 [PMID: 21171757]
  29. Cognition. 2009 Apr;111(1):138-43 [PMID: 19200537]
  30. Science. 2006 Nov 3;314(5800):829-32 [PMID: 17023614]
  31. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Jun;17(6):272-80 [PMID: 23664451]
  32. Nature. 2002 Jan 10;415(6868):137-40 [PMID: 11805825]
  33. Behav Brain Sci. 2005 Dec;28(6):795-815; discussion 815-55 [PMID: 16372952]
  34. Science. 2008 Mar 7;319(5868):1362-7 [PMID: 18323447]
  35. Hum Nat. 2013 Jun;24(2):115-25 [PMID: 23666518]
  36. Psychol Sci. 2012 May 1;23(5):483-91 [PMID: 22477103]
  37. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2009 Jun;4(2):199-207 [PMID: 19246473]
  38. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Feb;36(1):59-78 [PMID: 23445574]
  39. Nature. 2006 Aug 24;442(7105):912-5 [PMID: 16929297]
  40. Psychol Sci. 2009 Jan;20(1):1-5 [PMID: 19152536]
  41. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Sep;18(9):439-41 [PMID: 25168447]
  42. Science. 2010 Jun 11;328(5984):1408-11 [PMID: 20538951]
  43. Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Aug;28(8):474-81 [PMID: 23787087]
  44. Psychol Sci. 2007 Sep;18(9):803-9 [PMID: 17760777]
  45. Nat Genet. 1994 Oct;8(2):117-21 [PMID: 7842008]
  46. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 May 12;364(1521):1309-16 [PMID: 19528012]
  47. Science. 1961 Nov 10;134(3489):1501-6 [PMID: 14471768]
  48. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Mar;14(3):104-9 [PMID: 20149715]
  49. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul;8(4):380-94 [PMID: 26173118]
  50. Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:179-99 [PMID: 21943167]
  51. Psychol Sci. 2014 Aug;25(8):1554-62 [PMID: 24919511]
  52. Dev Psychol. 2004 Mar;40(2):217-33 [PMID: 14979762]
  53. Am J Public Health. 2009 Oct;99 Suppl 2:S405-11 [PMID: 19797755]
  54. Psychol Bull. 2012 Sep;138(5):907-12 [PMID: 22925143]
  55. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Aug;22(8):1670-81 [PMID: 19642883]
  56. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48292 [PMID: 23133582]
  57. Psychol Sci. 2012 Feb;23(2):196-204 [PMID: 22258431]
  58. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 12;9(8):e104685 [PMID: 25115938]
  59. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57989 [PMID: 23483960]
  60. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Dec;3(12):461-468 [PMID: 10562725]
  61. Cognition. 2014 Feb;130(2):217-26 [PMID: 24333538]
  62. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):19751-6 [PMID: 18056814]
  63. PLoS One. 2013 Aug 07;8(8):e71182 [PMID: 23951106]
  64. Br J Dev Psychol. 2005 Nov;23(4):587-607 [PMID: 21214599]
  65. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Oct;81(4):697-710 [PMID: 11642355]
  66. Cognition. 1999 Apr 1;70(3):241-72 [PMID: 10384737]
  67. Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Apr 22;278(1709):1239-46 [PMID: 20943697]
  68. Science. 2008 Oct 3;322(5898):58-62 [PMID: 18832637]
  69. Psychol Sci. 2010 Sep;21(9):1202-7 [PMID: 20679523]
  70. Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:271-98 [PMID: 20731601]
  71. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 24;106(12):4876-81 [PMID: 19273839]
  72. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 27;364(1528):2417-28 [PMID: 19620112]
  73. Psychol Inq. 2012 Apr;23(2):101-124 [PMID: 22754268]
  74. Psychol Sci. 2007 Nov;18(11):999-1006 [PMID: 17958715]
  75. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 22;279(1741):3272-81 [PMID: 22628465]
  76. Cognition. 2013 Nov;129(2):379-91 [PMID: 23974049]
  77. Cognition. 2013 Dec;129(3):536-43 [PMID: 24045001]
  78. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010 Feb;14(1):17-36 [PMID: 19940283]
  79. Nature. 2007 Feb 15;445(7129):727-31 [PMID: 17301784]
  80. Emotion. 2011 Apr;11(2):262-6 [PMID: 21500895]
  81. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979 Sep 21;205(1161):581-98 [PMID: 42062]
  82. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50092 [PMID: 23251357]
  83. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Aug;143(4):1616-26 [PMID: 24773192]
  84. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36880 [PMID: 22666332]
  85. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Apr 08;368(1618):20120352 [PMID: 23569300]
  86. J Pers. 1999 Dec;67(6):1165-94 [PMID: 10637991]
  87. Behav Brain Sci. 2004 Dec;27(6):713-30; discussion 730-70 [PMID: 16035401]
  88. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Dec;101(6):1189-206 [PMID: 22059841]
  89. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Jan;78(1):81-91 [PMID: 10653507]
  90. Proc Biol Sci. 2010 May 7;277(1686):1315-23 [PMID: 20031986]
  91. Dev Psychol. 1999 Nov;35(6):1440-52 [PMID: 10563733]
  92. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 May;96(5):1029-46 [PMID: 19379034]
  93. Cogn Sci. 2008 Jun;32(4):713-40 [PMID: 21635351]
  94. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010 Feb;14(1):140-50 [PMID: 20089848]
  95. Evol Psychol. 2011 May 05;9(2):193-9 [PMID: 22947966]
  96. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40682 [PMID: 22866177]
  97. Science. 2000 May 5;288(5467):850-2 [PMID: 10797005]
  98. Hum Nat. 2005 Dec;16(4):410-46 [PMID: 26189839]
  99. Science. 2007 Oct 26;318(5850):636-40 [PMID: 17962562]
  100. Dev Psychol. 2006 May;42(3):555-65 [PMID: 16756445]
  101. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 09;9(4):e92302 [PMID: 24717972]
  102. Nature. 2002 Feb 14;415(6873):755 [PMID: 11845198]
  103. Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Dec;36(6):688-9; discussion 707-26 [PMID: 24304786]
  104. J Theor Biol. 1990 Jun 21;144(4):517-46 [PMID: 2402153]
  105. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Nov;39(11):1471-83 [PMID: 23969621]
  106. Anim Cogn. 2005 Jul;8(3):151-63 [PMID: 15490290]
  107. Behav Brain Sci. 2009 Dec;32(6):493-510; discussion 510-61 [PMID: 20105353]
  108. Dev Sci. 2007 Jan;10(1):147-51 [PMID: 17181713]
  109. Behav Brain Sci. 2006 Oct;29(5):453-62; discussion 462-98 [PMID: 17156519]
  110. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):1-16 [PMID: 5875341]
  111. Hum Nat. 2005 Dec;16(4):360-81 [PMID: 26189837]
  112. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Sep 7;279(1742):3556-64 [PMID: 22673357]
  113. Child Dev. 2014 Jul-Aug;85(4):1617-33 [PMID: 24433260]
  114. Hum Nat. 2007 Jun;18(2):88-108 [PMID: 26181843]
  115. Dev Psychol. 2012 Mar;48(2):492-8 [PMID: 22148948]
  116. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1961 Nov;63:466-92 [PMID: 13910234]
  117. Nature. 2003 Sep 18;425(6955):297-9 [PMID: 13679918]
  118. Psychol Sci. 2013 Aug;24(8):1602-5 [PMID: 23740550]
  119. Soc Neurosci. 2014;9(4):400-11 [PMID: 24720663]
  120. Nature. 2004 Nov 25;432(7016):499-502 [PMID: 15565153]

MeSH Term

Cross-Cultural Comparison
Humans
Morals
Religion
Social Behavior

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0religionmoralityrelationshipmakescientific"religion""morality"conceptionsrelevantlonghotlydebatedusmoral?necessarymorality?moralinclinationsemergeindependentlyreligiousintuitions?debatesnowadaysrumblejournalswellpubliclifefrequentlymarredseriesconceptualconfusionslimitationsManyinvestigationsfaileddecomposetheoreticallygroundedelementsadoptedparochialkeyconcepts-inparticularsanitized"prosocial"behaviorneglectedconsidercomplexinterplaycognitioncultureargueprogresscategoriesmustfractionatedsetbiologicallypsychologicallycogenttraitsrevealingcognitivefoundationsshapeconstrainculturalvariantsadoptfractionatingstrategysettingencompassingevolutionaryframeworkwithinsituateevaluateevidencegoalstwofold:producedetailedpicturecurrentstatefieldprovideroadmapfutureresearchReligion

Similar Articles

Cited By