What pharmacy practitioners need to know about ethics in scientific publishing.

Lejla Zunic, Izet Masic
Author Information
  1. Lejla Zunic: Discipline of Pharmacology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zenica, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
  2. Izet Masic: Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Abstract

Pharmacy practice is an ever-changing science and profession. We are witnessing many advancement of pharmacy technology, drug-related information and applied clinical pharmacy literature, which influence our every day's life. Thus, new knowledge generated by research and clinical experience widen the knowledge; change the understanding of drugs and their application in therapeutics and every days life. Thus, policy makers, pharmacists, clinicians and researchers must evaluate and use the information existing in the literature to implement in their healthcare delivery. This paper is prepared for pharmacy researchers and pharmacy students and analyzes the major principles of ethical conduct in general science and also closely related topics on ghost authorship, conflict of interest, assigning co-authorship, redundant/repetitive and duplicate publication. Furthermore, the paper provides an insight into fabrication and falsification of data, as the most common form of scientific fraud. Scientific misconduct goes against everything that normal scientific method wants to reach for and pharmacy practitioners as one the first line available health care professionals all round the world should be enough aware of its importance and details when they want to evaluate the medical and pharmaceutical literature and deliver unbiased and ethically published knowledge of drugs both for the research or during consultations for patients care.

Keywords

References

  1. J Int Bioethique. 2014 Jun;25(2):51-77, 171 [PMID: 25272794]
  2. Med Leg J. 2014 Dec;82(4):155-8 [PMID: 24973236]
  3. Nutr Hosp. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):375-7 [PMID: 19721917]
  4. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Mar 3;288(6418):661-2 [PMID: 6421421]
  5. Pharmacotherapy. 1993 Sep-Oct;13(5):521 [PMID: 8247926]
  6. Rev Saude Publica. 2012 Oct;46(5):894-900 [PMID: 23128267]
  7. J Adhes Dent. 2014 Apr;16(2):103 [PMID: 24757704]
  8. Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Jun;20(2):423-31 [PMID: 23982326]
  9. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Aug;42(8):1106-7 [PMID: 10458142]
  10. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 May;174(5):823 [PMID: 24799010]
  11. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2010 Jul-Aug;29(4):173-4 [PMID: 20543620]
  12. BMJ. 2007 Feb 3;334(7587):223 [PMID: 17272539]
  13. Ophthalmology. 2013 Jun;120(6):1111-2 [PMID: 23732053]
  14. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008 May;105(20):380-3 [PMID: 19626176]
  15. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1998 Jun;18(3):183-4 [PMID: 9617975]
  16. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2014 Apr-Jun;29(2):I-II [PMID: 25140484]
  17. J Lab Clin Med. 1988 Aug;112(2):137 [PMID: 3397620]
  18. PLoS Med. 2007 Jan;4(1):e19 [PMID: 17227134]
  19. Int J Prev Med. 2014 Sep;5(9):1073-82 [PMID: 25317288]
  20. Health Soc Care Community. 2000 Nov;8(6):355-361 [PMID: 11560705]
  21. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1980 Jul-Aug;14(7-8):537-9 [PMID: 10297947]
  22. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014 Mar;11(2):288 [PMID: 24932205]
  23. BMJ. 2002 Aug 31;325(7362):496 [PMID: 12211237]
  24. Eval Rev. 2015 Feb;39(1):19-45 [PMID: 24408905]
  25. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37413 [PMID: 22629391]
  26. J Int Oral Health. 2014 Apr;6(2):i [PMID: 24917694]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pharmacyliteratureknowledgescientificscienceinformationclinicaleverylifeThusresearchdrugsresearchersevaluatepaperconflictinterestduplicatepublicationpractitionerscarePharmacypracticeever-changingprofessionwitnessingmanyadvancementtechnologydrug-relatedappliedinfluenceday'snewgeneratedexperiencewidenchangeunderstandingapplicationtherapeuticsdayspolicymakerspharmacistscliniciansmustuseexistingimplementhealthcaredeliverypreparedstudentsanalyzesmajorprinciplesethicalconductgeneralalsocloselyrelatedtopicsghostauthorshipassigningco-authorshipredundant/repetitiveFurthermoreprovidesinsightfabricationfalsificationdatacommonformfraudScientificmisconductgoeseverythingnormalmethodwantsreachonefirstlineavailablehealthprofessionalsroundworldenoughawareimportancedetailswantmedicalpharmaceuticaldeliverunbiasedethicallypublishedconsultationspatientsneedknowethicspublishingAuthorshipbioethicalissuesplagiarism

Similar Articles

Cited By