A function for binaural integration in auditory grouping and segregation in the inferior colliculus.

Kyle T Nakamoto, Trevor M Shackleton, David A Magezi, Alan R Palmer
Author Information
  1. Kyle T Nakamoto: Medical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio; and knakamoto@neomed.edu.
  2. Trevor M Shackleton: Medical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom;
  3. David A Magezi: Laboratory for Cognitive and Neurological Sciences, Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Science, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
  4. Alan R Palmer: Medical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom;

Abstract

Responses of neurons to binaural, harmonic complex stimuli in urethane-anesthetized guinea pig inferior colliculus (IC) are reported. To assess the binaural integration of harmonicity cues for sound segregation and grouping, responses were measured to harmonic complexes with different fundamental frequencies presented to each ear. Simultaneously gated harmonic stimuli with fundamental frequencies of 125 Hz and 145 Hz were presented to the left and right ears, respectively, and recordings made from 96 neurons with characteristic frequencies >2 kHz in the central nucleus of the IC. Of these units, 70 responded continuously throughout the stimulus and were excited by the stimulus at the contralateral ear. The stimulus at the ipsilateral ear excited (EE: 14%; 10/70), inhibited (EI: 33%; 23/70), or had no significant effect (EO: 53%; 37/70), defined by the effect on firing rate. The neurons phase locked to the temporal envelope at each ear to varying degrees depending on signal level. Many of the cells (predominantly EO) were dominated by the response to the contralateral stimulus. Another group (predominantly EI) synchronized to the contralateral stimulus and were suppressed by the ipsilateral stimulus in a phasic manner. A third group synchronized to the stimuli at both ears (predominantly EE). Finally, a group only responded when the waveform peaks from each ear coincided. We conclude that these groups of neurons represent different "streams" of information but exhibit modifications of the response rather than encoding a feature of the stimulus, like pitch.

Keywords

References

  1. J Neurophysiol. 2010 Apr;103(4):2050-61 [PMID: 20147418]
  2. Hear Res. 1996 Aug;97(1-2):136-52 [PMID: 8844194]
  3. J Neurophysiol. 2007 Dec;98(6):3171-84 [PMID: 17913991]
  4. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Jun;103(6):3527-39 [PMID: 9637036]
  5. Am J Psychol. 1948 Apr;61(2):205-13 [PMID: 18859554]
  6. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 May;91(5):2894-902 [PMID: 1629482]
  7. J Acoust Soc Am. 1986 Oct;80(4):1048-56 [PMID: 3771925]
  8. Hear Res. 1999 Dec;138(1-2):29-44 [PMID: 10575112]
  9. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jun;123(6):4421-33 [PMID: 18537393]
  10. J Neurophysiol. 1990 Mar;63(3):570-91 [PMID: 2329362]
  11. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Mar;101(3):1660-70 [PMID: 9069633]
  12. J Neurophysiol. 2007 Feb;97(2):1413-27 [PMID: 17151230]
  13. J Neurophysiol. 1993 Jul;70(1):64-80 [PMID: 8395589]
  14. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Sep;106(3 Pt 1):1465-79 [PMID: 10489704]
  15. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Sep;124(3):1653-67 [PMID: 19045656]
  16. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Jun;113(6):3323-34 [PMID: 12822804]
  17. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51646 [PMID: 23251604]
  18. Hear Res. 1990 Aug 1;47(1-2):103-38 [PMID: 2228789]
  19. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jan;125(1):324-7 [PMID: 19173419]
  20. J Neurophysiol. 1969 Jul;32(4):613-36 [PMID: 5810617]
  21. Biol Cybern. 2014 Apr;108(2):169-81 [PMID: 24570350]
  22. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Aug;98(2 Pt 1):785-97 [PMID: 7642817]
  23. Hear Res. 2002 Jun;168(1-2):150-62 [PMID: 12117517]
  24. J Neurophysiol. 1988 Dec;60(6):1823-40 [PMID: 3236053]
  25. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Jun;105(6):3436-48 [PMID: 10380667]
  26. Eur J Neurosci. 2006 Jul;24(2):491-8 [PMID: 16836634]
  27. Z Tierpsychol. 1976 May;41(1):80-106 [PMID: 961122]
  28. J Neurophysiol. 1979 Nov;42(6):1626-39 [PMID: 501392]
  29. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Jun;103(6):3509-26 [PMID: 9637035]
  30. Hear Res. 1999 May;131(1-2):89-106 [PMID: 10355607]
  31. Front Neuroanat. 2014 Jul 18;8:70 [PMID: 25100950]
  32. J Laryngol Otol. 1971 Mar;85(3):213-32 [PMID: 5550604]
  33. Nat Neurosci. 2001 Apr;4(4):396-401 [PMID: 11276230]
  34. J Speech Hear Res. 1969 Mar;12(1):5-38 [PMID: 5779912]
  35. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Jun;95(6):3529-40 [PMID: 8046144]
  36. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999 Jun;25(3):617-29 [PMID: 10385981]
  37. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1988 Nov;26(6):669-72 [PMID: 3256764]
  38. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2009 Mar;10(1):76-90 [PMID: 19089495]

Grants

  1. MC_U135097126/Medical Research Council
  2. R03 DC012871/NIDCD NIH HHS
  3. R03DC-012871/NIDCD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Auditory Perception
Evoked Potentials, Auditory
Female
Guinea Pigs
Inferior Colliculi
Male
Neurons

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0stimulusearneuronsbinauralharmonicstimuliinferiorcolliculusintegrationfrequenciescontralateralpredominantlygroupcomplexICsegregationgroupingdifferentfundamentalpresentedHzearsrespondedexcitedipsilateraleffectresponsesynchronizedpitchResponsesurethane-anesthetizedguineapigreportedassessharmonicitycuessoundresponsesmeasuredcomplexesSimultaneouslygated125145leftrightrespectivelyrecordingsmade96characteristic>2kHzcentralnucleusunits70continuouslythroughoutEE:14%10/70inhibitedEI:33%23/70significantEO:53%37/70definedfiringratephaselockedtemporalenvelopevaryingdegreesdependingsignallevelManycellsEOdominatedAnotherEIsuppressedphasicmannerthirdEEFinallywaveformpeakscoincidedconcludegroupsrepresent"streams"informationexhibitmodificationsratherencodingfeaturelikefunctionauditory

Similar Articles

Cited By