Comparative transcriptome analyses between a spontaneous late-ripening sweet orange mutant and its wild type suggest the functions of ABA, sucrose and JA during citrus fruit ripening.

Ya-Jian Zhang, Xing-Jian Wang, Ju-Xun Wu, Shan-Yan Chen, Hong Chen, Li-Jun Chai, Hua-Lin Yi
Author Information
  1. Ya-Jian Zhang: Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China; National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
  2. Xing-Jian Wang: Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China; National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
  3. Ju-Xun Wu: Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China; National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
  4. Shan-Yan Chen: Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China; National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China; Kunming Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming, 650000, China.
  5. Hong Chen: Engineering Technology College, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
  6. Li-Jun Chai: Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China; National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
  7. Hua-Lin Yi: Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China; National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.

Abstract

A spontaneous late-ripening mutant of 'Jincheng' (C. sinensis L. Osbeck) sweet orange exhibited a delay of fruit pigmentation and harvesting. In this work, we studied the processes of orange fruit ripening through the comparative analysis between the Jincheng mutant and its wild type. This study revealed that the fruit quality began to differ on 166th days after anthesis. At this stage, fruits were subjected to transcriptome analysis by RNA sequencing. 13,412 differentially expressed unigenes (DEGs) were found. Of these unigenes, 75.8% were down-regulated in the wild type, suggesting that the transcription level of wild type was lower than that of the mutant during this stage. These DEGs were mainly clustered into five pathways: metabolic pathways, plant-pathogen interaction, spliceosome, biosynthesis of plant hormones and biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids. Therefore, the expression profiles of the genes that are involved in abscisic acid, sucrose, and jasmonic acid metabolism and signal transduction pathways were analyzed during the six fruit ripening stages. The results revealed the regulation mechanism of sweet orange fruit ripening metabolism in the following four aspects: First, the more mature orange fruits were, the lower the transcription levels were. Second, the expression level of PME boosted with the maturity of the citrus fruit. Therefore, the expression level of PME might represent the degree of the orange fruit ripeness. Third, the interaction of PP2C, PYR/PYL, and SnRK2 was peculiar to the orange fruit ripening process. Fourth, abscisic acid, sucrose, and jasmonic acid all took part in orange fruit ripening process and might interact with each other. These findings provide an insight into the intricate process of sweet orange fruit ripening.

References

  1. Plant Physiol. 2010 Apr;152(4):1787-95 [PMID: 20118272]
  2. Genome Res. 2010 Feb;20(2):265-72 [PMID: 20019144]
  3. J Integr Plant Biol. 2010 Oct;52(10):856-67 [PMID: 20883438]
  4. J Plant Physiol. 2010 Nov 15;167(17):1486-93 [PMID: 20728961]
  5. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10:276 [PMID: 21159189]
  6. Plant Physiol. 2011 Sep;157(1):188-99 [PMID: 21734113]
  7. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:454 [PMID: 21936920]
  8. BMC Plant Biol. 2011;11:149 [PMID: 22047180]
  9. J Exp Bot. 2011 Nov;62(15):5659-69 [PMID: 21873532]
  10. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:10 [PMID: 22230690]
  11. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:19 [PMID: 22244270]
  12. Genome Res. 2012 Mar;22(3):577-91 [PMID: 22110045]
  13. Plant Mol Biol. 2012 Apr;78(6):617-26 [PMID: 22351158]
  14. J Exp Bot. 2012 Aug;63(13):4931-45 [PMID: 22888124]
  15. J Exp Bot. 2012 Oct;63(16):5751-61 [PMID: 22945939]
  16. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:511 [PMID: 23016559]
  17. J Plant Physiol. 2012 Dec 15;169(18):1858-65 [PMID: 22884412]
  18. Nat Genet. 2013 Jan;45(1):59-66 [PMID: 23179022]
  19. New Phytol. 2013 Apr;198(2):453-65 [PMID: 23425297]
  20. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2013 Sep;70:433-44 [PMID: 23835361]
  21. Phytochemistry. 2013 Nov;95:127-34 [PMID: 23850079]
  22. J Exp Bot. 2013 Nov;64(14):4461-78 [PMID: 24006419]
  23. Plant Physiol. 2014 Jan;164(1):365-83 [PMID: 24276949]
  24. J Exp Bot. 2014 Apr;65(6):1651-71 [PMID: 24600016]
  25. J Exp Bot. 2014 Jul;65(12):3005-14 [PMID: 24723399]
  26. Physiol Plant. 2014 Aug;151(4):507-21 [PMID: 24372483]
  27. J Plant Physiol. 2014 Sep 15;171(15):1315-24 [PMID: 25046752]
  28. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:695 [PMID: 25142253]
  29. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e107562 [PMID: 25215597]
  30. J Exp Bot. 2014 Nov;65(20):5835-48 [PMID: 25129131]
  31. J Exp Bot. 2014 Nov;65(20):5889-902 [PMID: 25135520]
  32. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol. 1999;:138-48 [PMID: 10786296]
  33. Plant Physiol. 2000 Sep;124(1):343-53 [PMID: 10982448]
  34. Plant Physiol. 2004 Feb;134(2):824-37 [PMID: 14739348]
  35. J Chromatogr A. 1997 Jan 10;758(1):99-107 [PMID: 9035387]
  36. Bioinformatics. 2005 Sep 15;21(18):3674-6 [PMID: 16081474]
  37. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jul 1;34(Web Server issue):W293-7 [PMID: 16845012]
  38. Nat Methods. 2008 Jul;5(7):621-8 [PMID: 18516045]
  39. Genome Res. 2008 Sep;18(9):1509-17 [PMID: 18550803]
  40. Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Jan;10(1):57-63 [PMID: 19015660]
  41. Gene. 2009 Feb 1;430(1-2):95-104 [PMID: 18930791]
  42. J Proteomics. 2009 May 2;72(4):586-607 [PMID: 19135558]
  43. J Agric Food Chem. 2009 Sep 9;57(17):7974-82 [PMID: 19655798]
  44. Planta. 2010 Jun;232(1):219-34 [PMID: 20407788]

MeSH Term

Abscisic Acid
Base Sequence
Citrus sinensis
Cyclopentanes
Gene Expression Profiling
Gene Expression Regulation, Plant
Oxylipins
Phosphoprotein Phosphatases
Plant Proteins
Protein Phosphatase 2C
Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases
Sequence Analysis, RNA
Sucrose
Transcriptome

Chemicals

Cyclopentanes
Oxylipins
Plant Proteins
Sucrose
jasmonic acid
Abscisic Acid
Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases
Phosphoprotein Phosphatases
Protein Phosphatase 2C

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0fruitorangeripeningmutantsweetwildtypeacidlevelexpressionsucroseprocessspontaneouslate-ripeninganalysisrevealedstagefruitstranscriptomeunigenesDEGstranscriptionlowerpathwaysinteractionbiosynthesisThereforeabscisicjasmonicmetabolismPMEcitrusmight'Jincheng'CsinensisLOsbeckexhibiteddelaypigmentationharvestingworkstudiedprocessescomparativeJinchengstudyqualitybegandiffer166thdaysanthesissubjectedRNAsequencing13412differentiallyexpressedfound758%down-regulatedsuggestingmainlyclusteredfivepathways:metabolicplant-pathogenspliceosomeplanthormonesphenylpropanoidsprofilesgenesinvolvedsignaltransductionanalyzedsixstagesresultsregulationmechanismfollowingfouraspects:FirstmaturelevelsSecondboostedmaturityrepresentdegreeripenessThirdPP2CPYR/PYLSnRK2peculiarFourthtookpartinteractfindingsprovideinsightintricateComparativeanalysessuggestfunctionsABAJA

Similar Articles

Cited By