Alterations in maxillary sinus volume among oral and nasal breathers.

Kamil Serkan Agacayak, Belgin Gulsun, Mahmut Koparal, Yusuf Atalay, Orhan Aksoy, Ozkan Adiguzel
Author Information
  1. Kamil Serkan Agacayak: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Dicle, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
  2. Belgin Gulsun: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Dicle, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
  3. Mahmut Koparal: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Adıyaman, Adıyaman, Turkey.
  4. Yusuf Atalay: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Afyon Kocatepe, Afyon, Turkey.
  5. Orhan Aksoy: Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Dicle, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
  6. Ozkan Adiguzel: Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Dicle, Diyarbakır, Turkey.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oral breathing causes many changes in the facial anatomical structures in adult patients. In this study we aimed to determine the effects of long-term oral breathing (>5 years) on the maxillary sinus volumes among adult male patients.
MATERIAL/METHODS: We accessed medical records of 586 patients who had undergone cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for any reason between September 2013 and April 2014. patients who had undergone cone-beam dental volumetric tomography scans for any reason and who had answered a questionnaire about breathing were screened retrospectively. Cone beam dental volumetric tomography (I-Cat, Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA, USA) was used to take the images of the maxillo-facial area at a setting of 120 kVp and 3.7 mA. This study involved male patients older than 21 years of age.
RESULTS: The study included a total of 239 male patients, of which 68 were oral breathers and 171 were nasal breathers. The mean age of the oral breathers was 48.4 years and that of the nasal breathers was 46.7 years and the difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). The mean maxillary sinus volumes of the oral and nasal breathers were 9043.49±1987.90 and 10851.77±2769.37, respectively, and the difference in maxillary sinus volume between the 2 groups was statistically significant (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The volume of maxillary sinus in oral breathers (>5 years) was significantly lower than in nasal breathers, but it remains unclear whether this is due to malfunctioning of the nasal cavity or due to the underlying pathological condition.

References

  1. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012 Jan-Mar;30(1):27-31 [PMID: 22565514]
  2. Laryngoscope. 2010 Oct;120(10):2089-93 [PMID: 20824738]
  3. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011 Apr;19(2):175-81 [PMID: 21552720]
  4. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Oct;106(4):561-2 [PMID: 18928899]
  5. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2008 Nov-Dec;84(6):529-35 [PMID: 19060979]
  6. Braz Dent J. 2002;13(2):129-32 [PMID: 12238804]
  7. BMC Med Imaging. 2011;11:8 [PMID: 21466703]
  8. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Nov-Dec;76(6):709-12 [PMID: 21180937]
  9. Angle Orthod. 2008 Jul;78(4):647-54 [PMID: 18302463]
  10. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Dec;142(6):801-13 [PMID: 23195366]
  11. J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2011 Dec;23(4):308-14 [PMID: 22231050]
  12. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jul;78(7):1167-72 [PMID: 24833165]
  13. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2013 Mar;296(3):414-26 [PMID: 23382025]
  14. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Oct;140(4):486-92 [PMID: 21967935]
  15. Angle Orthod. 1990 Fall;60(3):167-76 [PMID: 2202236]
  16. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1994 Aug;23(3):163-8 [PMID: 7835518]
  17. Eur J Radiol. 2009 Sep;71(3):461-8 [PMID: 18639404]
  18. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Jul;106(1):106-14 [PMID: 18504152]
  19. J Oral Rehabil. 2013 Jun;40(6):429-35 [PMID: 23566154]
  20. Cien Saude Colet. 2010 Mar;15(2):437-44 [PMID: 20414610]
  21. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2003 Winter;27(2):95-100 [PMID: 12597677]
  22. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Nov;40(11):1227-37 [PMID: 21764260]
  23. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1996 Jan;25(1):19-24 [PMID: 9084281]
  24. Morphologie. 2003 Mar;87(276):17-22 [PMID: 12793110]
  25. J Oral Rehabil. 2012 Aug;39(8):559-67 [PMID: 22490018]
  26. BMC Oral Health. 2012;12:30 [PMID: 22883529]
  27. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2013 Jan-Apr;3(1):9-14 [PMID: 25737873]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Female
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Male
Maxillary Sinus
Middle Aged
Mouth
Nasal Cavity
Respiration
Retrospective Studies
Software
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0breathersoralnasalpatientsyearsmaxillarysinusbreathingstudymaletomographyvolumeadult>5volumesamongundergonebeamreasondentalvolumetric7agemeandifferencestatisticallysignificantdueBACKGROUND:Oralcausesmanychangesfacialanatomicalstructuresaimeddetermineeffectslong-termMATERIAL/METHODS:accessedmedicalrecords586conecomputedCBCTSeptember2013April2014Patientscone-beamscansansweredquestionnairescreenedretrospectivelyConeI-CatImagingSciencesInternationalHatfieldPAUSAusedtakeimagesmaxillo-facialareasetting120kVp3mAinvolvedolder21RESULTS:includedtotal2396817148446p>005904349±1987901085177±276937respectively2groupsp<0001CONCLUSIONS:significantlylowerremainsunclearwhethermalfunctioningcavityunderlyingpathologicalconditionAlterations

Similar Articles

Cited By (9)