Do statins impair cognition? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Brian R Ott, Lori A Daiello, Issa J Dahabreh, Beth A Springate, Kimberly Bixby, Manjari Murali, Thomas A Trikalinos
Author Information
  1. Brian R Ott: Rhode Island Hospital, Department of Neurology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA, BOtt@brown.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2012, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning regarding potential adverse effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) on cognition, based on the Adverse Events Reporting System and a review of the medical literature. We aimed to synthesize randomized clinical trial (RCTs) evidence on the association between statin therapy and cognitive outcomes.
METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL through December 2012, and reviewed published systematic reviews of statin treatment. We sought RCTs that compared statin treatment versus placebo or standard care, and reported at least one cognitive outcome (frequency of adverse cognitive events or measurements using standard neuropsychological cognitive test scores). Studies reporting sufficient information to calculate effect sizes were included in meta-analyses. Standardized and unstandardized mean differences were calculated for continuous outcomes for global cognition and for pre-specified cognitive domains. The main outcome was change in cognition measured by neuropsychological tests; an outcome of secondary interest was the frequency of adverse cognitive events observed during follow-up.
RESULTS: We identified 25 RCTs (all placebo-controlled) reporting cognitive outcomes in 46,836 subjects, of which 23 RCTs reported cognitive test results in 29,012 participants. Adverse cognitive outcomes attributable to statins were rarely reported in trials involving cognitively normal or impaired subjects. Furthermore, meta-analysis of cognitive test data (14 studies; 27,643 participants) failed to show significant adverse effects of statins on all tests of cognition in either cognitively normal subjects (standardized mean difference 0.01, 95% confidence interval, CI, -0.01 to 0.03, p���=���0.42) or Alzheimer's disease subjects (standardized mean difference -0.05, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.10, p���=���0.38).
CONCLUSIONS: Statin therapy was not associated with cognitive impairment in RCTs. These results raise questions regarding the continued merit of the FDA warning about potential adverse effects of statins on cognition.

References

  1. Neurology. 2011 Aug 9;77(6):556-63 [PMID: 21795660]
  2. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2011 Sep;15(9):985-91 [PMID: 22013720]
  3. Diabetes Care. 2002 Jul;25(7):1250-1 [PMID: 12087035]
  4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;(1):CD004816 [PMID: 21249663]
  5. Lancet. 2004 Mar 6;363(9411):757-67 [PMID: 15016485]
  6. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;66(8):847-55 [PMID: 23747228]
  7. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2006;185:78-86 [PMID: 16866915]
  8. J Neurol. 2010 Jan;257(1):85-90 [PMID: 19653027]
  9. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD003160 [PMID: 19370582]
  10. J Clin Pharmacol. 1994 Oct;34(10):989-96 [PMID: 7836550]
  11. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2001 Sep;72(9):805-12 [PMID: 11565814]
  12. Clin Cardiol. 1995 Apr;18(4):209-14 [PMID: 7788948]
  13. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;62(2):217-24 [PMID: 15699299]
  14. Int Psychogeriatr. 1996 Summer;8(2):195-203 [PMID: 8994890]
  15. Arch Neurol. 2005 May;62(5):753-7 [PMID: 15883262]
  16. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98 [PMID: 1202204]
  17. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2003 Nov;35(4):504-11 [PMID: 14748494]
  18. Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Feb;27(2):183-90 [PMID: 17253908]
  19. Ann Neurol. 2002 Sep;52(3):346-50 [PMID: 12205648]
  20. Cleve Clin J Med. 2008 Mar;75 Suppl 2:S87-93 [PMID: 18540154]
  21. J Neurotrauma. 2008 Aug;25(8):1011-7 [PMID: 18690806]
  22. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;27(1):49-58 [PMID: 21308791]
  23. J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 Aug;36(8):728-31 [PMID: 8877677]
  24. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Jul;6(4):390-9 [PMID: 23838105]
  25. Neuroepidemiology. 2004 Jan-Apr;23(1-2):94-8 [PMID: 14739574]
  26. N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 20;359(21):2195-207 [PMID: 18997196]
  27. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Nov;88(11):1213-21 [PMID: 24095248]
  28. Neurology. 2010 Mar 23;74(12):956-64 [PMID: 20200346]
  29. Consult Pharm. 2003 May;18(5):466-72 [PMID: 16563062]
  30. Pharmacotherapy. 2009 Jul;29(7):800-11 [PMID: 19558254]
  31. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Apr 19;57(16):1666-75 [PMID: 21492764]
  32. BMC Med. 2014 Mar 22;12:51 [PMID: 24655568]
  33. J Alzheimers Dis. 2008 Mar;13(2):187-97 [PMID: 18376061]
  34. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2010 Jul-Sep;114(3):885-91 [PMID: 21235125]
  35. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Aug 04;(8):CD007514 [PMID: 20687089]
  36. Am J Med. 2004 Dec 1;117(11):823-9 [PMID: 15589485]
  37. Pharmacotherapy. 2003 Jul;23(7):871-80 [PMID: 12885101]
  38. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;83(2):171-3 [PMID: 22019547]
  39. Am J Cardiol. 1988 Nov 11;62(15):16J-27J [PMID: 3055920]
  40. JAMA. 2001 Jan 24-31;285(4):437-43 [PMID: 11242428]
  41. Ann Pharmacother. 2012 Apr;46(4):549-57 [PMID: 22474137]
  42. Singapore Med J. 2013 Mar;54(3):131-5 [PMID: 23546024]
  43. Drugs Aging. 2002;19(10):793-805 [PMID: 12390056]
  44. Am J Med. 2012 Sep;125(9):845-53 [PMID: 22938925]
  45. Lancet. 2002 Jul 6;360(9326):7-22 [PMID: 12114036]
  46. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23;360(9346):1623-30 [PMID: 12457784]
  47. J Clin Lipidol. 2010 Nov-Dec;4(6):462-71 [PMID: 21122692]
  48. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1994 Mar;37(3):231-6 [PMID: 8198930]
  49. J Neurosurg. 2013 Mar;118(3):669-75 [PMID: 23289819]
  50. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Nov 19;159(10):688-97 [PMID: 24247674]
  51. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Apr;22(4):345-58 [PMID: 23225700]
  52. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Nov;65(11):949-57 [PMID: 20841372]
  53. Res Synth Methods. 2010 Jan;1(1):39-65 [PMID: 26056092]
  54. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2007;23(3):194-201 [PMID: 17259710]
  55. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012 Aug;21(6):436-44 [PMID: 21236699]
  56. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;28(3):266-75 [PMID: 19609078]
  57. PLoS One. 2013 Sep 10;8(9):e75467 [PMID: 24040413]
  58. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2006;185:3-7 [PMID: 16866904]
  59. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;21(1):95-102 [PMID: 20413854]
  60. Am J Med. 2000 May;108(7):538-46 [PMID: 10806282]
  61. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1995 Mar;39(3):333-6 [PMID: 7619678]
  62. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012 Oct;10(5):296-302 [PMID: 22921881]
  63. Clin Cardiol. 1992 Jun;15(6):426-32 [PMID: 1617822]
  64. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Sep 4;60(10):875-81 [PMID: 22902202]
  65. Pharmacotherapy. 2001 Jun;21(6):767-9 [PMID: 11401190]
  66. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Jan;45(1):8-14 [PMID: 8994481]
  67. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;23(2):307-18 [PMID: 21098985]
  68. JAMA. 2008 Jul 16;300(3):287-94 [PMID: 18632543]

Grants

  1. K08 HS017735/AHRQ HHS

MeSH Term

Cognition Disorders
Humans
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
Neuropsychological Tests
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Chemicals

Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cognitiveadversestatinscognitionRCTsoutcomessubjectseffectsstatinreportedoutcometestmean0-02012FDAwarningregardingpotentialAdversereviewrandomizedtherapysystematictreatmentstandardfrequencyeventsneuropsychologicalreportingtestsresultsparticipantstrialscognitivelynormalmeta-analysisstandardizeddifference0195%CIp���=���0BACKGROUND:UnitedStatesFoodDrugAdministrationissuedHMG-CoAreductaseinhibitorsbasedEventsReportingSystemmedicalliteratureaimedsynthesizeclinicaltrialevidenceassociationMETHODS:searchedMEDLINEEMBASECochraneCENTRALDecemberreviewedpublishedreviewssoughtcomparedversusplacebocareleastonemeasurementsusingscoresStudiessufficientinformationcalculateeffectsizesincludedmeta-analysesStandardizedunstandardizeddifferencescalculatedcontinuousglobalpre-specifieddomainsmainchangemeasuredsecondaryinterestobservedfollow-upRESULTS:identified25placebo-controlled468362329012attributablerarelyinvolvingimpairedFurthermoredata14studies27643failedshowsignificanteitherconfidenceinterval0342Alzheimer'sdisease05191038CONCLUSIONS:Statinassociatedimpairmentraisequestionscontinuedmeritimpaircognition?controlled

Similar Articles

Cited By